Red Hat Satellite engineering is moving the tracking of its product development work on Satellite to Red Hat Jira (issues.redhat.com). If you're a Red Hat customer, please continue to file support cases via the Red Hat customer portal. If you're not, please head to the "Satellite project" in Red Hat Jira and file new tickets here. Individual Bugzilla bugs will be migrated starting at the end of May. If you cannot log in to RH Jira, please consult article #7032570. That failing, please send an e-mail to the RH Jira admins at rh-issues@redhat.com to troubleshoot your issue as a user management inquiry. The email creates a ServiceNow ticket with Red Hat. Individual Bugzilla bugs that are migrated will be moved to status "CLOSED", resolution "MIGRATED", and set with "MigratedToJIRA" in "Keywords". The link to the successor Jira issue will be found under "Links", have a little "two-footprint" icon next to it, and direct you to the "Satellite project" in Red Hat Jira (issue links are of type "https://issues.redhat.com/browse/SAT-XXXX", where "X" is a digit). This same link will be available in a blue banner at the top of the page informing you that that bug has been migrated.
Bug 1927170 - foreman-maintain quits the actual run for backup commands, with unavailable option n(no) as same as q(quit).
Summary: foreman-maintain quits the actual run for backup commands, with unavailable o...
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED WONTFIX
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat Satellite
Classification: Red Hat
Component: Satellite Maintain
Version: 6.9.0
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
unspecified
low
Target Milestone: Unspecified
Assignee: satellite6-bugs
QA Contact: Gaurav Talreja
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2021-02-10 09:31 UTC by Gaurav Talreja
Modified: 2022-10-28 18:02 UTC (History)
3 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2022-10-28 18:02:59 UTC
Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Gaurav Talreja 2021-02-10 09:31:40 UTC 
Description of problem:
From, https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1640974#c9
For foreman-maintain backup commands, where q(quit) option is available and unavailable option n(no) is also working as same as q(quit).
And however, if type any other letter then it keeps on looping the question, with an improper warning.   


Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
Satellite 6.9.0 Snap 12
Version: rubygem-foreman_maintain-0.7.4-1.el7sat.noarch

How reproducible:
always

Steps to Reproduce:
1. # foreman-maintain backup offline /tmp/
  <snip>
    Do you want to proceed?, [y(yes), q(quit)] n
                                                                        
    [ABORTED]
   ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- 
   Scenario [Backup] failed.

    The processing was aborted by user during the following steps:

     [backup-accessibility-confirmation]


    Running Failed backup cleanup
  </snip>

2. # foreman-maintain backup online /tmp/
  <snip>
    Do you want to proceed?, [y(yes), q(quit)] n
                                                                        
    [ABORTED]
  ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
   Scenario [Backup] failed.

   The processing was aborted by user during the following steps:

     [backup-online-safety-confirmation]


   Running Failed backup cleanup
  </snip>

3. # foreman-maintain backup online(or offline) /tmp/
   <snip>
    Do you want to proceed?, [y(yes), q(quit)] xyz
    *** WARNING: <warning-msg>
    Do you want to proceed?, [y(yes), q(quit)] xyz
    *** WARNING: <warning-msg>
    Do you want to proceed?, [y(yes), q(quit)]
   </snip>
   

Actual results:
option n(no) is working as same as q(quit)

Expected results:
option 'n' should also keep asking the question, as it's happening now for any invalid options.

Additional info:
Comment 2 Brad Buckingham 2022-09-02 20:25:18 UTC 
Upon review of our valid but aging backlog the Satellite Team has concluded that this Bugzilla does not meet the criteria for a resolution in the near term, and are planning to close in a month. This message may be a repeat of a previous update and the bug is again being considered to be closed. If you have any concerns about this, please contact your Red Hat Account team.  Thank you.
Comment 3 Brad Buckingham 2022-09-02 20:30:13 UTC 
Upon review of our valid but aging backlog the Satellite Team has concluded that this Bugzilla does not meet the criteria for a resolution in the near term, and are planning to close in a month. This message may be a repeat of a previous update and the bug is again being considered to be closed. If you have any concerns about this, please contact your Red Hat Account team.  Thank you.
Comment 4 Brad Buckingham 2022-10-28 18:02:59 UTC 
Thank you for your interest in Red Hat Satellite. We have evaluated this request, and while we recognize that it is a valid request, we do not expect this to be implemented in the product in the foreseeable future. This is due to other priorities for the product, and not a reflection on the request itself. We are therefore closing this out as WONTFIX. If you have any concerns about this feel free to contact your Red Hat Account Team. Thank you.
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.