Bug 1932491 - [sig-network-edge] Application behind service load balancer with PDB is not disrupted
Summary: [sig-network-edge] Application behind service load balancer with PDB is not d...
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED CANTFIX
Alias: None
Product: OpenShift Container Platform
Classification: Red Hat
Component: Networking
Version: 4.7
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
low
low
Target Milestone: ---
: 4.7.z
Assignee: aos-network-edge-staff
QA Contact: Hongan Li
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On: 1929396 1932493 1932629
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2021-02-24 17:56 UTC by Jon Jackson
Modified: 2022-08-04 22:32 UTC (History)
8 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Clone Of: 1929396
Environment:
[sig-network-edge] Application behind service load balancer with PDB is not disrupted
Last Closed: 2021-07-01 18:19:06 UTC
Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Jon Jackson 2021-02-24 17:56:01 UTC
+++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #1929396 +++

test:
[sig-network-edge] Application behind service load balancer with PDB is not disrupted 

is flaking frequently in CI, see search results:
https://search.ci.openshift.org/?maxAge=168h&context=1&type=bug%2Bjunit&name=&maxMatches=5&maxBytes=20971520&groupBy=job&search=%5C%5Bsig-network-edge%5C%5D+Application+behind+service+load+balancer+with+PDB+is+not+disrupted

Pass rate 50% on gcp according to sippy

Example:
https://prow.ci.openshift.org/view/gs/origin-ci-test/logs/release-openshift-origin-installer-e2e-aws-ovn-upgrade-4.5-stable-to-4.6-ci/1361717216143216640

disruption_tests: [sig-network-edge] Application behind service load balancer with PDB is not disrupted expand_less
Run #0: Failed expand_less	1h11m46s
Service was unreachable during disruption for at least 9s of 1h8m31s (0%), this is currently sufficient to pass the test/job but not considered completely correct:

Feb 16 17:59:45.229 E ns/e2e-k8s-service-lb-available-1335 svc/service-test Service stopped responding to GET requests over new connections
Feb 16 17:59:46.229 - 5s    E ns/e2e-k8s-service-lb-available-1335 svc/service-test Service is not responding to GET requests over new connections
Feb 16 17:59:52.690 I ns/e2e-k8s-service-lb-available-1335 svc/service-test Service started responding to GET requests over new connections
Feb 16 18:01:44.229 E ns/e2e-k8s-service-lb-available-1335 svc/service-test Service stopped responding to GET requests over new connections
Feb 16 18:01:44.414 I ns/e2e-k8s-service-lb-available-1335 svc/service-test Service started responding to GET requests over new connections
Feb 16 18:18:00.411 E ns/e2e-k8s-service-lb-available-1335 svc/service-test Service stopped responding to GET requests over new connections
Feb 16 18:18:01.229 E ns/e2e-k8s-service-lb-available-1335 svc/service-test Service is not responding to GET requests over new connections
Feb 16 18:18:01.401 I ns/e2e-k8s-service-lb-available-1335 svc/service-test Service started responding to GET requests over new connections
Run #1: Passed expand_more

--- Additional comment from Miciah Dashiel Butler Masters on 2021-02-18 12:22:33 EST ---

From the Sippy results, I don't see a 50% failure rate.  Note that the Sippy link provided includes test runs where the test did not exceed the threshold to cause a failure.  Ryan will investigate to determine the actual failure rate and severity of the issue.


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.