Bug 1932768 - Abrt failed on retrace
Summary: Abrt failed on retrace
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: retrace-server
Version: 33
Hardware: x86_64
OS: Linux
urgent
urgent
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Matej Grabovsky
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks: 1939467
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2021-02-25 08:16 UTC by Danilo Marcucci
Modified: 2021-06-22 08:08 UTC (History)
13 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2021-06-22 07:41:04 UTC
Type: Bug
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)
Screnshot of the desktop to evidence the long time before of the failed (3.17 MB, image/png)
2021-02-25 08:16 UTC, Danilo Marcucci
no flags Details

Description Danilo Marcucci 2021-02-25 08:16:45 UTC
Created attachment 1759211 [details]
Screnshot of the desktop to evidence the long time before of the failed

Description of problem:
when abrt generate a backtrace its fail every time after 40 minutes  


Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):abrt-2.14.5-1.fc33.x86_64


How reproducible:
Every time to generate a report


Steps to Reproduce:
1. Apllication crashed
2. Automatically start abrt analitycs
3. Attend 40 minutes to Retrace failed

Actual results:
Retrace failed

Expected results:
Report a bug on Bugzilla

Additional info:

Comment 1 Christian Kujau 2021-03-06 22:23:49 UTC
So, after bug 1902312 (and bug 1885154) have been closed, I guess this is the new "retrace failed" bug for abrt.

===========================================
$ abrt report 0a31090
Reporting problem 0a31090

no actions matching this problem found for event 'collect_GConf'
no actions matching this problem found for event 'collect_vimrc_system'
no actions matching this problem found for event 'collect_vimrc_user'
('report_uReport' completed successfully)
No /home/christian/.cache/gdm/session.log
Ok to upload core dump? (It may contain sensitive data). If your answer is 'No', a stack trace will be generated locally. (It may download a huge amount of data). [y/N/f/e] y
Querying server settings
Preparing an archive to upload
Uploading 3.6 MiB
Upload successful
Retrace job started
Generating backtrace
.
Retrace job failed
Retrace failed. Try again later and if the problem persists report this issue please.
[2021-03-06 22:15:49] [I] Analyzing crash data

Do you want to generate a stack trace locally? (It may download a huge amount of data but reporting can't continue without stack trace). [y/N/f] 
===========================================


This keeps happening, over and over again, and I don't know the last time abrt would be able to successfully complete the retrace job anymore. And I don't mean to complain, but I asked this question a couple of times now: isn't this a huge problem when people are no longer able to report bugs to Fedora? I could imagine getting bug reports along with backtraces must be the best (most useful) bugs a software company could receive, so it's really puzzling to me why the retrace server isn't working correctly for some time now :-\

Comment 2 Christian Kujau 2021-03-25 17:05:28 UTC
And again:


$ abrt report 05750bd
Reporting problem 05750bd

no actions matching this problem found for event 'collect_GConf'
no actions matching this problem found for event 'collect_vimrc_system'
no actions matching this problem found for event 'collect_vimrc_user'
('report_uReport' completed successfully)
No /home/christian/.cache/gdm/session.log
Ok to upload core dump? (It may contain sensitive data). If your answer is 'No', a stack trace will be generated locally. (It may download a huge amount of data). [y/N/f/e] y
Querying server settings
Preparing an archive to upload
Uploading 2.0 MiB
Upload successful
Retrace job started
Analyzing crash data
.......
Retrace job failed
Retrace failed. Try again later and if the problem persists report this issue please.
[2021-03-25 15:55:12] [I] Analyzing crash data

Do you want to generate a stack trace locally? (It may download a huge amount of data but reporting can't continue without stack trace). [y/N/f] 
('analyze_CCpp' exited with 1)

Comment 3 Danilo Marcucci 2021-03-25 17:58:49 UTC
Tok! Tok! Is there anyone?

Comment 4 Michal Srb 2021-03-26 08:09:15 UTC
Yes! Matej is focusing on this issue and he made a huge progress already.

Ths fix should land shortly. Sorry for the inconvenience.

Comment 5 Christian Kujau 2021-04-25 16:57:02 UTC
$ abrt report fc505cb
Reporting problem fc505cb

no actions matching this problem found for event 'collect_GConf'
no actions matching this problem found for event 'collect_vimrc_system'
no actions matching this problem found for event 'collect_vimrc_user'
no actions matching this problem found for event 'collect_xsession_errors'
('report_uReport' completed successfully)
Ok to upload core dump? (It may contain sensitive data). If your answer is 'No', a stack trace will be generated locally. (It may download a huge amount of data). [y/N/f/e] y
Querying server settings
Preparing an archive to upload
You are going to upload 15.0 MiB. Continue? [y/N] y
Uploading 15.0 MiB
Upload successful
Retrace job started
Analyzing crash data
................................................................................
.................
Retrace job failed
Retrace failed. Try again later and if the problem persists report this issue please.
[2021-04-25 16:34:50] [I] Analyzing crash data

Do you want to generate a stack trace locally? (It may download a huge amount of data but reporting can't continue without stack trace). [y/N/f] n
('analyze_CCpp' exited with 1)

Comment 6 Christian Kujau 2021-05-02 17:38:37 UTC
$ ksh &
[1] 284475
$ kill -6 $!

[1]+  Stopped                 ksh
$ fg
ksh
Aborted (core dumped)

$ abrt
f7f50e5 1x ksh 2021-05-02 16:05:25

$ abrt report f7f50e5
Reporting problem f7f50e5

no actions matching this problem found for event 'collect_GConf'
no actions matching this problem found for event 'collect_vimrc_system'
no actions matching this problem found for event 'collect_vimrc_user'
no actions matching this problem found for event 'collect_xsession_errors'
('report_uReport' completed successfully)
Ok to upload core dump? (It may contain sensitive data). If your answer is 'No', a stack trace will be generated locally. (It may download a huge amount of data). [y/N/f/e] y
Querying server settings
Preparing an archive to upload
Uploading 31.9 KiB
Upload successful
Retrace job started
Retrace job failed
Retrace failed. Try again later and if the problem persists report this issue please.
[2021-05-02 14:08:11] [I] Analyzing crash data

Do you want to generate a stack trace locally? (It may download a huge amount of data but reporting can't continue without stack trace). [y/N/f] n
('analyze_CCpp' exited with 1)

Comment 7 Matej Grabovsky 2021-06-22 07:41:04 UTC
We have deployed an upgrade for Retrace Server yesterday which should fix most of these problems.

At the moment, retracing Fedora 33 and 34 on x86-64 should should proceed with little problems.

(Note that very big coredumps might still take some time and perhaps fail anyway. We'll be looking into that as a separate problem.)


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.