Note: This bug is displayed in read-only format because the product is no longer active in Red Hat Bugzilla.
RHEL Engineering is moving the tracking of its product development work on RHEL 6 through RHEL 9 to Red Hat Jira (issues.redhat.com). If you're a Red Hat customer, please continue to file support cases via the Red Hat customer portal. If you're not, please head to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira and file new tickets here. Individual Bugzilla bugs in the statuses "NEW", "ASSIGNED", and "POST" are being migrated throughout September 2023. Bugs of Red Hat partners with an assigned Engineering Partner Manager (EPM) are migrated in late September as per pre-agreed dates. Bugs against components "kernel", "kernel-rt", and "kpatch" are only migrated if still in "NEW" or "ASSIGNED". If you cannot log in to RH Jira, please consult article #7032570. That failing, please send an e-mail to the RH Jira admins at rh-issues@redhat.com to troubleshoot your issue as a user management inquiry. The email creates a ServiceNow ticket with Red Hat. Individual Bugzilla bugs that are migrated will be moved to status "CLOSED", resolution "MIGRATED", and set with "MigratedToJIRA" in "Keywords". The link to the successor Jira issue will be found under "Links", have a little "two-footprint" icon next to it, and direct you to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira (issue links are of type "https://issues.redhat.com/browse/RHEL-XXXX", where "X" is a digit). This same link will be available in a blue banner at the top of the page informing you that that bug has been migrated.

Bug 1934179

Summary: Configuration of a VLAN over a bonding used through a different VLAN as a port to an OVS bridge fails
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8 Reporter: Petr Horáček <phoracek>
Component: nmstateAssignee: Fernando F. Mancera <ferferna>
Status: CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE QA Contact: Mingyu Shi <mshi>
Severity: high Docs Contact:
Priority: unspecified    
Version: 8.3CC: ferferna, jiji, jishi, network-qe, till
Target Milestone: rcFlags: pm-rhel: mirror+
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: Unspecified   
OS: Unspecified   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2021-06-08 09:12:19 UTC Type: Bug
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description Petr Horáček 2021-03-02 16:32:28 UTC
Description of problem:
This is to address the issue described in https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1929317#c4.

When a host is configured as following:

[eth0]--[bond1]--[vlan10]--[OVS bridge]
[eth1]-/

And the desired state is adding a VLAN iface and a linux bridge, so the resulting config would look like:

[eth0]--[bond1]--[vlan10]--[OVS bridge]
[eth1]-/     \---[vlan20]--[linux bridge]

nmstate fails the configuration.


Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
nmstate 0.3


How reproducible:
Always

Steps to Reproduce:
1. Get a host with a topology similar to the one described above.
2. Apply:
    interfaces:
      - name: bond1.1044
        type: vlan
        state: up
        vlan:
          base-iface: bond1
          id: 1044
      - name: br-ext2
        description: br-ext2 with bond1.1044
        type: linux-bridge
        state: up
        ipv4:
          enabled: false
        bridge:
          options:
            stp:
              enabled: false
          port:
            - name: bond0.1044

Actual results:
This fails with a complaint about the OVS bridge.


Expected results:
The new VLAN and bridge should be configured without touching the existing topology.

Additional info:
This does not fail on 8.4.
Find more details about reproducers in the original BZ https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1929317

Comment 1 Petr Horáček 2021-06-08 08:55:53 UTC
Hello @fge, we failed to reproduce this issue outside customer's environment. Your team provided a fix a while back and it seems that it resolved this issue https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1929317#c24. Therefore, I think we can close this BZ unless you want to cover this by QE. Whichever you prefer.

Comment 2 Fernando F. Mancera 2021-06-08 09:12:19 UTC
Our QA verified the OVS issue that was causing this. Therefore I am closing this as CURRENTRELEASE. Thanks Petr.