Bug 1936745
| Summary: | "Mix" Image source in service description | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Red Hat Storage] Red Hat Ceph Storage | Reporter: | Sunil Kumar Nagaraju <sunnagar> |
| Component: | Cephadm | Assignee: | Adam King <adking> |
| Status: | CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE | QA Contact: | Sunil Kumar Nagaraju <sunnagar> |
| Severity: | low | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | low | ||
| Version: | 5.0 | CC: | adking, kdreyer, rmandyam, vereddy |
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||
| Target Release: | 5.1 | ||
| Hardware: | Unspecified | ||
| OS: | Unspecified | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | ceph-16.1.0-1323.el8cp | Doc Type: | If docs needed, set a value |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2022-04-30 16:19:01 UTC | Type: | Bug |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
| Embargoed: | |||
|
Comment 1
Adam King
2021-03-17 22:09:21 UTC
There is actually consideration to remove the image name field from 'orch ps' and 'orch ls' as it is not super helpful when it displays an image digest and this issue with the 'mix' image name is very difficult to fix otherwise (and the "mix" might confuse users into thinking there are two different images being used). We were thinking instead that the image id is a more reliable field and the user can still always get the image name if they want by asking for json/yaml output. Removing it would also technically fix this bug. The PR to do so is here: https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/40222 PR https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/40222 was merged, just awaiting backport. Change was backported https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/40437. Should be in next downstream build. Since this is low priority, I suggest we re-target to 5.1. Actually already put up a potential fix for this https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/40595 and forgot to update this BZ. I'm still fine with moving it to 5.1 though. Not a priority for now. Sunil, if you agree, would you mind re-targeting this to 5.1? |