test: [sig-api-machinery] CustomResourcePublishOpenAPI [Privileged:ClusterAdmin] works for CRD preserving unknown fields in an embedded object [Conformance] [Suite:openshift/conformance/parallel/minimal] [Suite:k8s] is *FLAKING* frequently in CI, see search results: https://search.ci.openshift.org/?maxAge=168h&context=1&type=bug%2Bjunit&name=&maxMatches=5&maxBytes=20971520&groupBy=job&search=%5C%5Bsig-api-machinery%5C%5D+CustomResourcePublishOpenAPI+%5C%5BPrivileged%3AClusterAdmin%5C%5D+works+for+CRD+preserving+unknown+fields+in+an+embedded+object+%5C%5BConformance%5C%5D+%5C%5BSuite%3Aopenshift%2Fconformance%2Fparallel%2Fminimal%5C%5D+%5C%5BSuite%3Ak8s%5C%5D https://prow.ci.openshift.org/view/gs/origin-ci-test/logs/release-openshift-ocp-installer-e2e-metal-4.8/1371728029318909952 https://prow.ci.openshift.org/view/gs/origin-ci-test/logs/release-openshift-ocp-installer-e2e-metal-4.8/1371290079061872640 ``` I0315 03:47:23.490413 16560 test_context.go:459] Tolerating taints "node-role.kubernetes.io/master" when considering if nodes are ready [BeforeEach] [Top Level] github.com/openshift/origin/test/extended/util/framework.go:1440 [BeforeEach] [Top Level] github.com/openshift/origin/test/extended/util/framework.go:1440 [BeforeEach] [Top Level] github.com/openshift/origin/test/extended/util/test.go:59 [BeforeEach] [sig-api-machinery] CustomResourcePublishOpenAPI [Privileged:ClusterAdmin] k8s.io/kubernetes.0/test/e2e/framework/framework.go:174 STEP: Creating a kubernetes client STEP: Building a namespace api object, basename crd-publish-openapi Mar 15 03:47:24.819: INFO: About to run a Kube e2e test, ensuring namespace is privileged Mar 15 03:47:25.739: INFO: No PodSecurityPolicies found; assuming PodSecurityPolicy is disabled. STEP: Waiting for a default service account to be provisioned in namespace [It] works for CRD preserving unknown fields in an embedded object [Conformance] [Suite:openshift/conformance/parallel/minimal] [Suite:k8s] k8s.io/kubernetes.0/test/e2e/framework/framework.go:629 Mar 15 03:47:33.369: INFO: sleeping 45 seconds before running the actual tests, we hope that during all API servers converge during that window, see "https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/90452" for more STEP: client-side validation (kubectl create and apply) allows request with any unknown properties Mar 15 03:48:18.369: INFO: Running '/usr/bin/kubectl --server=https://api.ci-op-2z4kd7d3-57772.origin-ci-int-aws.dev.rhcloud.com:6443 --kubeconfig=/tmp/admin.kubeconfig --namespace=e2e-crd-publish-openapi-9441 --namespace=e2e-crd-publish-openapi-9441 create -f -' Mar 15 03:48:19.210: INFO: stderr: "" Mar 15 03:48:19.210: INFO: stdout: "e2e-test-crd-publish-openapi-7664-crd.crd-publish-openapi-test-unknown-in-nested.example.com/test-cr created\n" Mar 15 03:48:19.210: INFO: Running '/usr/bin/kubectl --server=https://api.ci-op-2z4kd7d3-57772.origin-ci-int-aws.dev.rhcloud.com:6443 --kubeconfig=/tmp/admin.kubeconfig --namespace=e2e-crd-publish-openapi-9441 --namespace=e2e-crd-publish-openapi-9441 delete e2e-test-crd-publish-openapi-7664-crds test-cr' Mar 15 03:48:19.665: INFO: stderr: "" Mar 15 03:48:19.665: INFO: stdout: "e2e-test-crd-publish-openapi-7664-crd.crd-publish-openapi-test-unknown-in-nested.example.com \"test-cr\" deleted\n" Mar 15 03:48:19.665: INFO: Running '/usr/bin/kubectl --server=https://api.ci-op-2z4kd7d3-57772.origin-ci-int-aws.dev.rhcloud.com:6443 --kubeconfig=/tmp/admin.kubeconfig --namespace=e2e-crd-publish-openapi-9441 --namespace=e2e-crd-publish-openapi-9441 apply -f -' Mar 15 03:48:22.363: INFO: stderr: "" Mar 15 03:48:22.363: INFO: stdout: "e2e-test-crd-publish-openapi-7664-crd.crd-publish-openapi-test-unknown-in-nested.example.com/test-cr created\n" Mar 15 03:48:22.364: INFO: Running '/usr/bin/kubectl --server=https://api.ci-op-2z4kd7d3-57772.origin-ci-int-aws.dev.rhcloud.com:6443 --kubeconfig=/tmp/admin.kubeconfig --namespace=e2e-crd-publish-openapi-9441 --namespace=e2e-crd-publish-openapi-9441 delete e2e-test-crd-publish-openapi-7664-crds test-cr' Mar 15 03:48:22.938: INFO: stderr: "" Mar 15 03:48:22.938: INFO: stdout: "e2e-test-crd-publish-openapi-7664-crd.crd-publish-openapi-test-unknown-in-nested.example.com \"test-cr\" deleted\n" STEP: kubectl explain works to explain CR Mar 15 03:48:22.938: INFO: Running '/usr/bin/kubectl --server=https://api.ci-op-2z4kd7d3-57772.origin-ci-int-aws.dev.rhcloud.com:6443 --kubeconfig=/tmp/admin.kubeconfig --namespace=e2e-crd-publish-openapi-9441 explain e2e-test-crd-publish-openapi-7664-crds' Mar 15 03:48:23.575: INFO: rc: 1 Mar 15 03:48:23.575: FAIL: failed to explain e2e-test-crd-publish-openapi-7664-crds: error running /usr/bin/kubectl --server=https://api.ci-op-2z4kd7d3-57772.origin-ci-int-aws.dev.rhcloud.com:6443 --kubeconfig=/tmp/admin.kubeconfig --namespace=e2e-crd-publish-openapi-9441 explain e2e-test-crd-publish-openapi-7664-crds: Command stdout: stderr: error: couldn't find resource for "crd-publish-openapi-test-unknown-in-nested.example.com/v1, Kind=E2e-test-crd-publish-openapi-7664-crd" error: exit status 1 Full Stack Trace github.com/onsi/ginkgo/internal/leafnodes.(*runner).runSync(0xc00041a840, 0x0, 0x0, 0x0, 0x0, 0x0, 0x0, 0x0, 0x0, 0x0, ...) github.com/onsi/ginkgo.0-origin.0+incompatible/internal/leafnodes/runner.go:113 +0xa3 github.com/onsi/ginkgo/internal/leafnodes.(*runner).run(0xc00041a840, 0xd0, 0x0, 0x0, 0x0, 0x0, 0x0, 0x0, 0x0, 0x0, ...) github.com/onsi/ginkgo.0-origin.0+incompatible/internal/leafnodes/runner.go:64 +0xd7 github.com/onsi/ginkgo/internal/leafnodes.(*ItNode).Run(0xc000a28180, 0x685e0e0, 0x0, 0x0, 0x0, 0x0, 0x0, 0x0, 0x0, 0x0, ...) github.com/onsi/ginkgo.0-origin.0+incompatible/internal/leafnodes/it_node.go:26 +0x67 github.com/onsi/ginkgo/internal/spec.(*Spec).runSample(0xc002bf6870, 0x0, 0x685e0e0, 0xc0003456c0) github.com/onsi/ginkgo.0-origin.0+incompatible/internal/spec/spec.go:215 +0x691 github.com/onsi/ginkgo/internal/spec.(*Spec).Run(0xc002bf6870, 0x685e0e0, 0xc0003456c0) github.com/onsi/ginkgo.0-origin.0+incompatible/internal/spec/spec.go:138 +0xf2 github.com/onsi/ginkgo/internal/specrunner.(*SpecRunner).runSpec(0xc00296c000, 0xc002bf6870, 0x0) github.com/onsi/ginkgo.0-origin.0+incompatible/internal/specrunner/spec_runner.go:200 +0x111 github.com/onsi/ginkgo/internal/specrunner.(*SpecRunner).runSpecs(0xc00296c000, 0x1) github.com/onsi/ginkgo.0-origin.0+incompatible/internal/specrunner/spec_runner.go:170 +0x127 github.com/onsi/ginkgo/internal/specrunner.(*SpecRunner).Run(0xc00296c000, 0xc0030ca020) github.com/onsi/ginkgo.0-origin.0+incompatible/internal/specrunner/spec_runner.go:66 +0x117 github.com/onsi/ginkgo/internal/suite.(*Suite).Run(0xc000331b30, 0x685e3c0, 0xc0028ae280, 0x0, 0x0, 0xc00175a020, 0x1, 0x1, 0x693e220, 0xc0003456c0, ...) github.com/onsi/ginkgo.0-origin.0+incompatible/internal/suite/suite.go:62 +0x426 github.com/openshift/origin/pkg/test/ginkgo.(*TestOptions).Run(0xc00262e5a0, 0xc002620960, 0x1, 0x1, 0x5ddc267, 0x3483f20) github.com/openshift/origin/pkg/test/ginkgo/cmd_runtest.go:61 +0x438 main.newRunTestCommand.func1.1() github.com/openshift/origin/cmd/openshift-tests/openshift-tests.go:426 +0x4e github.com/openshift/origin/test/extended/util.WithCleanup(0xc001ebfbf8) github.com/openshift/origin/test/extended/util/test.go:167 +0x5f main.newRunTestCommand.func1(0xc001649340, 0xc002620960, 0x1, 0x1, 0x0, 0x0) github.com/openshift/origin/cmd/openshift-tests/openshift-tests.go:426 +0x2f2 github.com/spf13/cobra.(*Command).execute(0xc001649340, 0xc002620930, 0x1, 0x1, 0xc001649340, 0xc002620930) github.com/spf13/cobra.1/command.go:850 +0x47c github.com/spf13/cobra.(*Command).ExecuteC(0xc001648580, 0x0, 0x68657a0, 0x9551640) github.com/spf13/cobra.1/command.go:958 +0x375 github.com/spf13/cobra.(*Command).Execute(...) github.com/spf13/cobra.1/command.go:895 main.main.func1(0xc001648580, 0x0, 0x0) github.com/openshift/origin/cmd/openshift-tests/openshift-tests.go:84 +0x94 main.main() github.com/openshift/origin/cmd/openshift-tests/openshift-tests.go:85 +0x3ea [AfterEach] [sig-api-machinery] CustomResourcePublishOpenAPI [Privileged:ClusterAdmin] k8s.io/kubernetes.0/test/e2e/framework/framework.go:175 STEP: Collecting events from namespace "e2e-crd-publish-openapi-9441". STEP: Found 1 events. Mar 15 03:48:23.649: INFO: At 2021-03-15 03:47:23 +0000 UTC - event for e2e-crd-publish-openapi-9441: {namespace-security-allocation-controller } CreatedSCCRanges: created SCC ranges Mar 15 03:48:23.721: INFO: POD NODE PHASE GRACE CONDITIONS Mar 15 03:48:23.721: INFO: Mar 15 03:48:23.940: INFO: skipping dumping cluster info - cluster too large STEP: Destroying namespace "e2e-crd-publish-openapi-9441" for this suite. fail [github.com/onsi/ginkgo.0-origin.0+incompatible/internal/leafnodes/runner.go:113]: Mar 15 03:48:23.575: failed to explain e2e-test-crd-publish-openapi-7664-crds: error running /usr/bin/kubectl --server=https://api.ci-op-2z4kd7d3-57772.origin-ci-int-aws.dev.rhcloud.com:6443 --kubeconfig=/tmp/admin.kubeconfig --namespace=e2e-crd-publish-openapi-9441 explain e2e-test-crd-publish-openapi-7664-crds: Command stdout: stderr: error: couldn't find resource for "crd-publish-openapi-test-unknown-in-nested.example.com/v1, Kind=E2e-test-crd-publish-openapi-7664-crd" error: exit status 1 ``` Seeing it on 4.7 jobs oo; seems to affect `metal` jobs the most
This bug hasn't had any activity in the last 30 days. Maybe the problem got resolved, was a duplicate of something else, or became less pressing for some reason - or maybe it's still relevant but just hasn't been looked at yet. As such, we're marking this bug as "LifecycleStale" and decreasing the severity/priority. If you have further information on the current state of the bug, please update it, otherwise this bug can be closed in about 7 days. The information can be, for example, that the problem still occurs, that you still want the feature, that more information is needed, or that the bug is (for whatever reason) no longer relevant. Additionally, you can add LifecycleFrozen into Keywords if you think this bug should never be marked as stale. Please consult with bug assignee before you do that.
I’m adding UpcomingSprint, because I was occupied by fixing bugs with higher priority/severity, developing new features with higher priority, or developing new features to improve stability at a macro level. I will revisit this bug next sprint.
The LifecycleStale keyword was removed because the bug moved to QE. The bug assignee was notified.
Checked the ci test results for https://testgrid.k8s.io/redhat-openshift-ocp-release-4.10-informing#release-openshift-ocp-installer-e2e-metal-4.10, There is no good test result to take a look. We can see the test [sig-api-machinery] CustomResourcePublishOpenAPI [Privileged:ClusterAdmin] works for CRD preserving unknown fields in an embedded object [Conformance] [Suite:openshift/conformance/parallel/minimal] [Suite:k8s] works well with the following OCP 4.10 tests, https://testgrid.k8s.io/redhat-openshift-ocp-release-4.10-informing#periodic-ci-openshift-release-master-ci-4.10-e2e-gcp https://testgrid.k8s.io/redhat-openshift-ocp-release-4.10-informing#periodic-ci-openshift-release-master-ci-4.10-e2e-gcp-ovn https://testgrid.k8s.io/redhat-openshift-ocp-release-4.10-informing#periodic-ci-openshift-release-master-ci-4.10-e2e-aws So can move the bug VERIFIED.
Since the problem described in this bug report should be resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For information on the advisory (Moderate: OpenShift Container Platform 4.10.3 security update), and where to find the updated files, follow the link below. If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report. https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2022:0056