Note: This bug is displayed in read-only format because
the product is no longer active in Red Hat Bugzilla.
RHEL Engineering is moving the tracking of its product development work on RHEL 6 through RHEL 9 to Red Hat Jira (issues.redhat.com). If you're a Red Hat customer, please continue to file support cases via the Red Hat customer portal. If you're not, please head to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira and file new tickets here. Individual Bugzilla bugs in the statuses "NEW", "ASSIGNED", and "POST" are being migrated throughout September 2023. Bugs of Red Hat partners with an assigned Engineering Partner Manager (EPM) are migrated in late September as per pre-agreed dates. Bugs against components "kernel", "kernel-rt", and "kpatch" are only migrated if still in "NEW" or "ASSIGNED". If you cannot log in to RH Jira, please consult article #7032570. That failing, please send an e-mail to the RH Jira admins at rh-issues@redhat.com to troubleshoot your issue as a user management inquiry. The email creates a ServiceNow ticket with Red Hat. Individual Bugzilla bugs that are migrated will be moved to status "CLOSED", resolution "MIGRATED", and set with "MigratedToJIRA" in "Keywords". The link to the successor Jira issue will be found under "Links", have a little "two-footprint" icon next to it, and direct you to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira (issue links are of type "https://issues.redhat.com/browse/RHEL-XXXX", where "X" is a digit). This same link will be available in a blue banner at the top of the page informing you that that bug has been migrated.
Description of problem:
When there are multiple redundant anti-colocation chains, the scheduler may move resources back and forth on each transition. The demonstration below uses a four-node cluster with three anti-colocated resources.
I don't know of any legitimate reason to intentionally configure redundant constraints, but they can arise unintentionally in the course of configuration. For example, a customer encountered the flip-flopping behavior when they had the following constraint sets (in addition to some dummy colocator sets):
set tstafs10a_colocator tstafs10b_colocator setoptions score=-INFINITY
set tstafs10a_colocator tstafs10b_colocator tstafs10c_colocator setoptions score=-INFINITY
set tstafs10a_colocator tstafs10b_colocator tstafs10c_colocator tstafs10d_colocator setoptions score=-INFINITY
These seemingly redundant constraints arose because the customer had an Ansible playbook that created a new group of resources (named by letter, e.g., group D) and then created a set constraint to negatively colocate the new group with the existing groups. They did this three times.
This is a low priority, since the solution is to delete the redundant constraints. I want to record it, however, since one would expect multiple redundant constraints to behave the same as a single constraint.
This might get addressed alongside BZ1943476.
There's a minimal demonstration in "Steps to Reproduce".
-----
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
pacemaker-2.0.4-6.el8 / master
-----
How reproducible:
Always
-----
Steps to Reproduce:
1. On a 3-node cluster, create 3 dummy resources.
# for i in {1..3}; do pcs resource create dummy$i ocf:heartbeat:Dummy; done
2. Anti-colocate them twice.
# pcs constraint colocation set dummy1 dummy2 dummy3 setoptions score=-INFINITY
# pcs constraint colocation set dummy1 dummy2 dummy3 setoptions score=-INFINITY --force
Duplicate constraints:
set dummy1 dummy2 dummy3 (id:colocation_set_d1d2d3_set) setoptions score=-INFINITY (id:colocation_set_d1d2d3)
Warning: duplicate constraint already exists
3. Run a simulation based on the live CIB and save the resulting CIB.
# crm_simulate -LS -O /tmp/next.xml
...
Transition Summary:
* Move dummy1 ( node1 -> node2 )
* Move dummy3 ( node2 -> node1 )
4. Run a simulation based on the resulting CIB.
# crm_simulate -R -x /tmp/next.xml
-----
Actual results:
dummy1 and dummy3 get moved back to their initial locations.
# crm_simulate -R -x /tmp/next.xml
...
Transition Summary:
* Move dummy1 ( node2 -> node1 )
* Move dummy3 ( node1 -> node2 )
-----
Expected results:
dummy1 and dummy3 stay put.
Comment 3RHEL Program Management
2023-09-22 19:00:50 UTC
Issue migration from Bugzilla to Jira is in process at this time. This will be the last message in Jira copied from the Bugzilla bug.
Comment 4RHEL Program Management
2023-09-22 19:03:10 UTC
This BZ has been automatically migrated to the issues.redhat.com Red Hat Issue Tracker. All future work related to this report will be managed there.
Due to differences in account names between systems, some fields were not replicated. Be sure to add yourself to Jira issue's "Watchers" field to continue receiving updates and add others to the "Need Info From" field to continue requesting information.
To find the migrated issue, look in the "Links" section for a direct link to the new issue location. The issue key will have an icon of 2 footprints next to it, and begin with "RHEL-" followed by an integer. You can also find this issue by visiting https://issues.redhat.com/issues/?jql= and searching the "Bugzilla Bug" field for this BZ's number, e.g. a search like:
"Bugzilla Bug" = 1234567
In the event you have trouble locating or viewing this issue, you can file an issue by sending mail to rh-issues. You can also visit https://access.redhat.com/articles/7032570 for general account information.
Description of problem: When there are multiple redundant anti-colocation chains, the scheduler may move resources back and forth on each transition. The demonstration below uses a four-node cluster with three anti-colocated resources. I don't know of any legitimate reason to intentionally configure redundant constraints, but they can arise unintentionally in the course of configuration. For example, a customer encountered the flip-flopping behavior when they had the following constraint sets (in addition to some dummy colocator sets): set tstafs10a_colocator tstafs10b_colocator setoptions score=-INFINITY set tstafs10a_colocator tstafs10b_colocator tstafs10c_colocator setoptions score=-INFINITY set tstafs10a_colocator tstafs10b_colocator tstafs10c_colocator tstafs10d_colocator setoptions score=-INFINITY These seemingly redundant constraints arose because the customer had an Ansible playbook that created a new group of resources (named by letter, e.g., group D) and then created a set constraint to negatively colocate the new group with the existing groups. They did this three times. This is a low priority, since the solution is to delete the redundant constraints. I want to record it, however, since one would expect multiple redundant constraints to behave the same as a single constraint. This might get addressed alongside BZ1943476. There's a minimal demonstration in "Steps to Reproduce". ----- Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): pacemaker-2.0.4-6.el8 / master ----- How reproducible: Always ----- Steps to Reproduce: 1. On a 3-node cluster, create 3 dummy resources. # for i in {1..3}; do pcs resource create dummy$i ocf:heartbeat:Dummy; done 2. Anti-colocate them twice. # pcs constraint colocation set dummy1 dummy2 dummy3 setoptions score=-INFINITY # pcs constraint colocation set dummy1 dummy2 dummy3 setoptions score=-INFINITY --force Duplicate constraints: set dummy1 dummy2 dummy3 (id:colocation_set_d1d2d3_set) setoptions score=-INFINITY (id:colocation_set_d1d2d3) Warning: duplicate constraint already exists 3. Run a simulation based on the live CIB and save the resulting CIB. # crm_simulate -LS -O /tmp/next.xml ... Transition Summary: * Move dummy1 ( node1 -> node2 ) * Move dummy3 ( node2 -> node1 ) 4. Run a simulation based on the resulting CIB. # crm_simulate -R -x /tmp/next.xml ----- Actual results: dummy1 and dummy3 get moved back to their initial locations. # crm_simulate -R -x /tmp/next.xml ... Transition Summary: * Move dummy1 ( node2 -> node1 ) * Move dummy3 ( node1 -> node2 ) ----- Expected results: dummy1 and dummy3 stay put.