Note: This bug is displayed in read-only format because the product is no longer active in Red Hat Bugzilla.

Bug 1944559

Summary:	OpenShift assisted installer fails with LACP on the primary bond
Product:	OpenShift Container Platform	Reporter:	Andreas Karis <akaris>
Component:	assisted-installer	Assignee:	Ronnie Lazar <alazar>
assisted-installer sub component:	discovery-agent	QA Contact:	Yuri Obshansky <yobshans>
Status:	CLOSED DUPLICATE	Docs Contact:
Severity:	unspecified
Priority:	unspecified	CC:	aos-bugs, augol
Version:	4.7
Target Milestone:	---
Target Release:	---
Hardware:	Unspecified
OS:	Unspecified
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:		Doc Type:	If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2021-03-30 09:37:14 UTC	Type:	Bug
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description Andreas Karis 2021-03-30 08:20:05 UTC

Description of problem:
OpenShift assisted installer fails with LACP on the primary bond

The customer isusing the provided iso to boot up their nodes and during startup they edit the kernel cmd line to apply the LACP config like this:
~~~
bond=bond0:eno1np0,ens1f0np0:mode=802.3ad,lacp_rate=fast,miimon=100,xmit_hash_policy=layer2+3 ip=bond0:dhcp
~~~

The validation then fails with:
~~~
But they are marked as insufficient:
Failed validations:
Belongs to majority connected group: No connectivity to the majority of hosts in the cluster.
~~~

The customer tried the same procedure without LACP bonding (by removing the bond on the switch and shutting down the second interface) and installation succeeds

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):


How reproducible:


Steps to Reproduce:
1.
2.
3.

Actual results:


Expected results:


Additional info:

Comment 4 Ronnie Lazar 2021-03-30 09:30:05 UTC

Andreas I think this is duplicate of https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1938671

Comment 5 Andreas Karis 2021-03-30 09:37:14 UTC


*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 1938671 ***

Comment 6 Andreas Karis 2021-03-30 09:39:48 UTC

Yeah, it definitely looks like it! Thanks