Created attachment 1771507 [details] install failed Description of problem: RHVH 4.4.6 ISO (RHVH-4.4-20210412.3-RHVH-x86_64-dvd1.iso) install failed ============ ValueError: The mount point is not valid. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): RHVH-4.4-20210412.3-RHVH-x86_64-dvd1.iso How reproducible: Steps to Reproduce: 1. Install RHVH-4.4-20210412.3-RHVH-x86_64-dvd1.iso via anaconda GUI. 2. 3. Actual results: RHVH 4.4.6 ISO (RHVH-4.4-20210412.3-RHVH-x86_64-dvd1.iso) install failed Expected results: RHVH 4.4.6 ISO install can successful. Additional info:
Created attachment 1771508 [details] all logs
Looks like the issue is due to the change in the Anaconda, that removed VIRTUALIZATION as a valid value for default_partitioning scheme.
A little bit more clarification is required to properly explain the issue. As already mentioned Anaconda had removed VIRTUALIZATION (and all other defines) as a valid value(s) for the default_partitioning property. That is something like: [Storage] default_scheme = LVM_THINP default_partitioning = VIRTUALIZATION that was valid in Ananonda 33.16.3.x is no longer valid format in Anaconda 33.16.4.x Instead, since Anaconda 33.16.4.x one needs to provide a full partitioning schema i.e. : [Storage] default_scheme = LVM_THINP default_partitioning = / (min 6 GiB) /home (size 1 GiB) /tmp (size 1 GiB) /var (size 15 GiB) /var/log (size 8 GiB) /var/log/audit (size 2 GiB) To make things even more complicated, it's impossible to use the new format in older Anaconda versions (i.e. 33.16.3.x). Thus the old format must be used for older version(s) of Anaconda, and new format for the newer version(s).
Can you please verify that the new version resolves the issue?
Since the problem described in this bug report should be resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For information on the advisory (Moderate: Red Hat Virtualization Host security update [ovirt-4.4.6]), and where to find the updated files, follow the link below. If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report. https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2021:2239