Bug 1948972
| Summary: | Memory usage for DB Kubernetes / Compute Resources / Namespace (Pods) and Kubernetes / Compute Resources / Namespace (Workloads) include unreasonable query | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | OpenShift Container Platform | Reporter: | hongyan li <hongyli> | ||||||
| Component: | Monitoring | Assignee: | Jan Fajerski <jfajersk> | ||||||
| Status: | CLOSED NOTABUG | QA Contact: | hongyan li <hongyli> | ||||||
| Severity: | low | Docs Contact: | |||||||
| Priority: | unspecified | ||||||||
| Version: | 4.8 | CC: | alegrand, anpicker, erooth, jfajersk, kakkoyun, lcosic, pkrupa, spasquie, surbania | ||||||
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||||||||
| Target Release: | --- | ||||||||
| Hardware: | Unspecified | ||||||||
| OS: | Unspecified | ||||||||
| Whiteboard: | |||||||||
| Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | If docs needed, set a value | |||||||
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |||||||
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||||||||
| Last Closed: | 2021-04-20 07:25:43 UTC | Type: | Bug | ||||||
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- | ||||||
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |||||||
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |||||||
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |||||||
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |||||||
| Embargoed: | |||||||||
| Attachments: |
|
||||||||
|
Description
hongyan li
2021-04-13 07:44:12 UTC
Created attachment 1771550 [details]
console DB
Created attachment 1771551 [details]
DB query
Is this something you could take a look at Pawel? I believe the UI is behaving as expected, but the question is whether the dashboard panel's query is correct. I don't see any formal reason for this query to be wrong. The metric kube_resourcequota exists, its just not necessarily set for a given namespaces and in that case nothing is returned for these queries. However when set this is a useful metric to display. @hongyan li: Any further thoughts on what can be improved here? Otherwise I'll close this soon. Thanks @Jan, I checked again, you are right and you can continue to close it. Thanks everyone, closing. |