Bug 1949358 - Review Request: seatd - Minimal seat management daemon and a universal seat management library
Summary: Review Request: seatd - Minimal seat management daemon and a universal seat m...
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED RAWHIDE
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: Package Review
Version: rawhide
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
medium
medium
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Neal Gompa
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2021-04-14 05:51 UTC by Aleksei Bavshin
Modified: 2021-04-14 14:43 UTC (History)
2 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2021-04-14 14:43:32 UTC
Type: ---
Embargoed:
ngompa13: fedora-review+


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Aleksei Bavshin 2021-04-14 05:51:00 UTC
Spec URL: https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/alebastr/sway-extras/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/02077198-seatd/seatd.spec
SRPM URL: https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/alebastr/sway-extras/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/02077198-seatd/seatd-0.5.0-0.1.fc35.src.rpm

Description:
A minimal seat management daemon, and a universal seat management library.
Seat management takes care of mediating access to shared devices (graphics, input), without requiring the applications needing access to be root.

Fedora Account System Username: alebastr

Review notes:

Dependency for future releases of wlroots and weston:
https://github.com/swaywm/wlroots/pull/2786
https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/wayland/weston/-/merge_requests/589

seatd server is disabled by default after discussing with upstream as it doesn't really play well with systemd-logind. I'm not planning to use, test or support this setup in Fedora.

builtin backend is not enabled as (again) we're going to rely on systemd-logind instead of granting SUID to each and every wlroots-based compositor.

Comment 1 Neal Gompa 2021-04-14 12:35:35 UTC
Taking this review.

Comment 2 Neal Gompa 2021-04-14 12:44:57 UTC
Package Review
==============

Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated



===== MUST items =====

C/C++:
[x]: Package does not contain kernel modules.
[x]: Package contains no static executables.
[x]: If your application is a C or C++ application you must list a
     BuildRequires against gcc, gcc-c++ or clang.
[x]: Header files in -devel subpackage, if present.
[x]: ldconfig not called in %post and %postun for Fedora 28 and later.
[x]: Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la)
[x]: Rpath absent or only used for internal libs.
[x]: Development (unversioned) .so files in -devel subpackage, if present.

Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
     other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
     Guidelines.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
     Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses
     found: "Unknown or generated", "Expat License". 44 files have unknown
     license. Detailed output of licensecheck in
     /home/ngompa/1949358-seatd/licensecheck.txt
[x]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed.
[x]: %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise.
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[x]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory
     names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
     Provides are present.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[x]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: Useful -debuginfo package or justification otherwise.
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[-]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
     (~1MB) or number of files.
     Note: Documentation size is 10240 bytes in 1 files.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least
     one supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
     Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
     license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
     license(s) for the package is included in %license.
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
     beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Dist tag is present.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package must not depend on deprecated() packages.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't
     work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package does not use a name that already exists.
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as
     provided in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
     %{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local

===== SHOULD items =====

Generic:
[x]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate
     file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments).
[x]: Fully versioned dependency in subpackages if applicable.
[x]: Package functions as described.
[x]: Latest version is packaged.
[x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream.
[-]: Sources are verified with gpgverify first in %prep if upstream
     publishes signatures.
     Note: gpgverify is not used.
[-]: Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains
     translations for supported Non-English languages, if available.
[x]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported
     architectures.
[x]: %check is present and all tests pass.
[x]: Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed
     files.
[x]: Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock.
[x]: Buildroot is not present
[x]: Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or
     $RPM_BUILD_ROOT)
[x]: No file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, /usr/sbin.
[x]: Packager, Vendor, PreReq, Copyright tags should not be in spec file
[x]: The placement of pkgconfig(.pc) files are correct.
[x]: Sources can be downloaded from URI in Source: tag
[x]: SourceX is a working URL.
[x]: Spec use %global instead of %define unless justified.

===== EXTRA items =====

Generic:
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all installed packages.
     Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: Large data in /usr/share should live in a noarch subpackage if package
     is arched.
[x]: Spec file according to URL is the same as in SRPM.


Rpmlint
-------
Checking: libseat-0.5.0-0.1.fc35.x86_64.rpm
          libseat-devel-0.5.0-0.1.fc35.x86_64.rpm
          seatd-debugsource-0.5.0-0.1.fc35.x86_64.rpm
          seatd-0.5.0-0.1.fc35.src.rpm
libseat.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US seatd -> seats, seat, seated
libseat.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US logind -> login, log ind, log-ind
libseat-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation
seatd.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US deamon -> daemon, demon, deacon
4 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 4 warnings.




Rpmlint (installed packages)
----------------------------
libseat.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US seatd -> seats, seat, seated
libseat.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US logind -> login, log ind, log-ind
libseat-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation
3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 3 warnings.



Source checksums
----------------
https://git.sr.ht/~kennylevinsen/seatd/archive/0.5.0.tar.gz#/seatd-0.5.0.tar.gz :
  CHECKSUM(SHA256) this package     : 274b56324fc81ca6002bc1cdd387668dee34a6e1063e5f3896805c3770948988
  CHECKSUM(SHA256) upstream package : 274b56324fc81ca6002bc1cdd387668dee34a6e1063e5f3896805c3770948988


Requires
--------
libseat (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered):
    libc.so.6()(64bit)
    libsystemd.so.0()(64bit)
    libsystemd.so.0(LIBSYSTEMD_209)(64bit)
    libsystemd.so.0(LIBSYSTEMD_213)(64bit)
    libsystemd.so.0(LIBSYSTEMD_221)(64bit)
    libsystemd.so.0(LIBSYSTEMD_237)(64bit)
    rtld(GNU_HASH)

libseat-devel (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered):
    /usr/bin/pkg-config
    libseat(x86-64)
    libseat.so.1()(64bit)
    pkgconfig(libsystemd)

seatd-debugsource (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered):



Provides
--------
libseat:
    libseat
    libseat(x86-64)
    libseat.so.1()(64bit)

libseat-devel:
    libseat-devel
    libseat-devel(x86-64)
    pkgconfig(libseat)

seatd-debugsource:
    seatd-debugsource
    seatd-debugsource(x86-64)



Generated by fedora-review 0.7.6 (b083f91) last change: 2020-11-10
Command line :/usr/bin/fedora-review -b 1949358 -m fedora-rawhide-x86_64
Buildroot used: fedora-rawhide-x86_64
Active plugins: Generic, Shell-api, C/C++
Disabled plugins: Java, PHP, Perl, Haskell, Ocaml, R, SugarActivity, Python, fonts
Disabled flags: EPEL6, EPEL7, DISTTAG, BATCH, EXARCH

Comment 3 Neal Gompa 2021-04-14 12:45:18 UTC
This package looks good to me.

PACKAGE APPROVED.

Comment 4 Gwyn Ciesla 2021-04-14 14:01:20 UTC
(fedscm-admin):  The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/seatd

Comment 5 Aleksei Bavshin 2021-04-14 14:43:32 UTC
Thanks for the review, Neal!


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.