Spec URL: https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/abbra/oauth2-support/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/02139903-liboauth2/liboauth2.spec SRPM URL: https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/abbra/oauth2-support/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/02139903-liboauth2/liboauth2-1.4.1-1.fc35.src.rpm Description: liboauth2 library provides primitives to create OAuth 2.x and OpenID Connect servers and clients Fedora Account System Username: abbra
I ran fedora-review for the package: This is a review *template*. Besides handling the [ ]-marked tests you are also supposed to fix the template before pasting into bugzilla: - Add issues you find to the list of issues on top. If there isn't such a list, create one. - Add your own remarks to the template checks. - Add new lines marked [!] or [?] when you discover new things not listed by fedora-review. - Change or remove any text in the template which is plain wrong. In this case you could also file a bug against fedora-review - Remove the "[ ] Manual check required", you will not have any such lines in what you paste. - Remove attachments which you deem not really useful (the rpmlint ones are mandatory, though) - Remove this text Package Review ============== Legend: [x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated [ ] = Manual review needed Issues: ======= - Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la) Note: liboauth2-static : /usr/lib64/liboauth2.la liboauth2-apache-static : /usr/lib64/liboauth2_apache.la See: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging- guidelines/#packaging-static-libraries - Dist tag is present. ===== MUST items ===== C/C++: [x]: Package does not contain kernel modules. [x]: Package contains no static executables. [x]: If your application is a C or C++ application you must list a BuildRequires against gcc, gcc-c++ or clang. [x]: Header files in -devel subpackage, if present. [x]: ldconfig not called in %post and %postun for Fedora 28 and later. [x]: Rpath absent or only used for internal libs. [x]: Development (unversioned) .so files in -devel subpackage, if present. Generic: [x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. [x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses found: "Unknown or generated", "GNU Affero General Public License, Version 3", "GNU Affero General Public License v3.0 or later". 20 files have unknown license. Detailed output of licensecheck in /home/abokovoy/src/packages/liboauth2/liboauth2/licensecheck.txt [x]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed. [x]: %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise. [x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception. [x]: Changelog in prescribed format. [x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content. [x]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application. [x]: Development files must be in a -devel package [x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime. [x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory names). [x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [x]: Package does not generate any conflict. [x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target. [-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and Provides are present. [x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary. [x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English. [-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need. [x]: Useful -debuginfo package or justification otherwise. [x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag. [-]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size (~1MB) or number of files. Note: Documentation size is 61440 bytes in 6 files. [x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines [x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one supported primary architecture. [x]: Package installs properly. [x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces. Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment). [x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %license. [x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses. [x]: Package must own all directories that it creates. [x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. [x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT [x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the beginning of %install. [x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time. [x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files. [x]: Permissions on files are set properly. [x]: Package must not depend on deprecated() packages. [x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't work. [x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters. [x]: Package does not use a name that already exists. [x]: Package is not relocatable. [x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. [x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. [x]: Static libraries in -static or -devel subpackage, providing -devel if present. Note: Package has .a files: liboauth2-static, liboauth2-apache-static. [x]: File names are valid UTF-8. [x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local ===== SHOULD items ===== Generic: [-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it. [x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments). [ ]: Fully versioned dependency in subpackages if applicable. Note: No Requires: %{name}%{?_isa} = %{version}-%{release} in liboauth2-static , liboauth2-apache-devel , liboauth2-apache-static [x]: Package functions as described. [x]: Latest version is packaged. [x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream. [x]: Patches link to upstream bugs/comments/lists or are otherwise justified. [-]: Sources are verified with gpgverify first in %prep if upstream publishes signatures. Note: gpgverify is not used. [-]: Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. [ ]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. [x]: %check is present and all tests pass. [-]: Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed files. [x]: Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. [x]: Buildroot is not present [x]: Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) [x]: No file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, /usr/sbin. [x]: Packager, Vendor, PreReq, Copyright tags should not be in spec file [x]: The placement of pkgconfig(.pc) files are correct. [x]: Sources can be downloaded from URI in Source: tag [x]: SourceX is a working URL. [x]: Spec use %global instead of %define unless justified. ===== EXTRA items ===== Generic: [x]: Rpmlint is run on debuginfo package(s). Note: No rpmlint messages. [x]: Rpmlint is run on all installed packages. Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment). [x]: Large data in /usr/share should live in a noarch subpackage if package is arched. [x]: Package should not use obsolete m4 macros Rpmlint ------- Checking: liboauth2-1.4.1-1.fc35.x86_64.rpm liboauth2-devel-1.4.1-1.fc35.x86_64.rpm liboauth2-static-1.4.1-1.fc35.x86_64.rpm liboauth2-apache-1.4.1-1.fc35.x86_64.rpm liboauth2-apache-devel-1.4.1-1.fc35.x86_64.rpm liboauth2-apache-static-1.4.1-1.fc35.x86_64.rpm liboauth2-debuginfo-1.4.1-1.fc35.x86_64.rpm liboauth2-debugsource-1.4.1-1.fc35.x86_64.rpm liboauth2-1.4.1-1.fc35.src.rpm liboauth2-apache.x86_64: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) OAuth -> Oath, Coauthor liboauth2-apache.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US OAuth -> Oath, Coauthor 9 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings. Rpmlint (debuginfo) ------------------- Checking: liboauth2-debuginfo-1.4.1-1.fc35.x86_64.rpm liboauth2-apache-debuginfo-1.4.1-1.fc35.x86_64.rpm 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. Rpmlint (installed packages) ---------------------------- liboauth2-apache.x86_64: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) OAuth -> Oath, Coauthor liboauth2-apache.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US OAuth -> Oath, Coauthor liboauth2-apache.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/liboauth2_apache.so.0.0.0 oauth2_shutdown liboauth2-apache.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/liboauth2_apache.so.0.0.0 oauth2_log_sink_ctx_get liboauth2-apache.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/liboauth2_apache.so.0.0.0 oauth2_json_decode_object liboauth2-apache.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/liboauth2_apache.so.0.0.0 json_object_iter_value liboauth2-apache.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/liboauth2_apache.so.0.0.0 oauth2_http_request_port_set liboauth2-apache.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/liboauth2_apache.so.0.0.0 oauth2_http_request_header_add liboauth2-apache.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/liboauth2_apache.so.0.0.0 oauth2_strdup liboauth2-apache.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/liboauth2_apache.so.0.0.0 json_integer_value liboauth2-apache.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/liboauth2_apache.so.0.0.0 oauth2_http_request_init liboauth2-apache.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/liboauth2_apache.so.0.0.0 json_object_iter_next liboauth2-apache.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/liboauth2_apache.so.0.0.0 oauth2_cfg_source_token_get_accept_in liboauth2-apache.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/liboauth2_apache.so.0.0.0 json_string_value liboauth2-apache.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/liboauth2_apache.so.0.0.0 oauth2_mem_free liboauth2-apache.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/liboauth2_apache.so.0.0.0 json_array_get liboauth2-apache.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/liboauth2_apache.so.0.0.0 ap_get_client_block liboauth2-apache.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/liboauth2_apache.so.0.0.0 oauth2_strnenvcmp liboauth2-apache.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/liboauth2_apache.so.0.0.0 oauth2_cfg_target_get_remote_user_claim liboauth2-apache.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/liboauth2_apache.so.0.0.0 ap_auth_name liboauth2-apache.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/liboauth2_apache.so.0.0.0 oauth2_http_request_context_set liboauth2-apache.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/liboauth2_apache.so.0.0.0 ap_getword_conf liboauth2-apache.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/liboauth2_apache.so.0.0.0 oauth2_http_request_scheme_set liboauth2-apache.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/liboauth2_apache.so.0.0.0 oauth2_http_response_headers_loop liboauth2-apache.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/liboauth2_apache.so.0.0.0 oauth2_cfg_target_pass_get_as_envvars liboauth2-apache.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/liboauth2_apache.so.0.0.0 oauth2_http_request_query_get liboauth2-apache.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/liboauth2_apache.so.0.0.0 oauth2_log liboauth2-apache.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/liboauth2_apache.so.0.0.0 oauth2_log_init liboauth2-apache.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/liboauth2_apache.so.0.0.0 oauth2_cfg_target_pass_get_as_headers liboauth2-apache.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/liboauth2_apache.so.0.0.0 oauth2_normalize_header_name liboauth2-apache.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/liboauth2_apache.so.0.0.0 oauth2_mem_alloc liboauth2-apache.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/liboauth2_apache.so.0.0.0 oauth2_parse_form_encoded_params liboauth2-apache.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/liboauth2_apache.so.0.0.0 oauth2_http_request_method_set liboauth2-apache.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/liboauth2_apache.so.0.0.0 ap_get_server_name_for_url liboauth2-apache.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/liboauth2_apache.so.0.0.0 json_array_size liboauth2-apache.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/liboauth2_apache.so.0.0.0 oauth2_init liboauth2-apache.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/liboauth2_apache.so.0.0.0 oauth2_cfg_target_pass_get_prefix liboauth2-apache.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/liboauth2_apache.so.0.0.0 json_object_iter_key liboauth2-apache.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/liboauth2_apache.so.0.0.0 oauth2_package_string liboauth2-apache.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/liboauth2_apache.so.0.0.0 oauth2_log_sink_create liboauth2-apache.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/liboauth2_apache.so.0.0.0 oauth2_http_request_headers_loop liboauth2-apache.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/liboauth2_apache.so.0.0.0 oauth2_http_response_status_code_get liboauth2-apache.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/liboauth2_apache.so.0.0.0 oauth2_cfg_target_pass_get_authn_header liboauth2-apache.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/liboauth2_apache.so.0.0.0 ap_should_client_block liboauth2-apache.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/liboauth2_apache.so.0.0.0 oauth2_json_encode liboauth2-apache.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/liboauth2_apache.so.0.0.0 oauth2_log_sink_level_set liboauth2-apache.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/liboauth2_apache.so.0.0.0 ap_run_http_scheme liboauth2-apache.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/liboauth2_apache.so.0.0.0 oauth2_http_request_hostname_set liboauth2-apache.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/liboauth2_apache.so.0.0.0 oauth2_stradd liboauth2-apache.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/liboauth2_apache.so.0.0.0 oauth2_http_request_free liboauth2-apache.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/liboauth2_apache.so.0.0.0 oauth2_log_free liboauth2-apache.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/liboauth2_apache.so.0.0.0 oauth2_http_request_query_set liboauth2-apache.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/liboauth2_apache.so.0.0.0 ap_setup_client_block liboauth2-apache.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/liboauth2_apache.so.0.0.0 oauth2_http_request_path_set liboauth2-apache.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/liboauth2_apache.so.0.0.0 json_object_iter liboauth2-apache.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/liboauth2_apache.so.0.0.0 json_object_get liboauth2-apache.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib64/liboauth2_apache.so.0.0.0 /lib64/libcrypt.so.2 liboauth2-apache.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib64/liboauth2_apache.so.0.0.0 /lib64/libexpat.so.1 liboauth2-apache.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib64/liboauth2_apache.so.0.0.0 /lib64/libldap_r-2.4.so.2 liboauth2-apache.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib64/liboauth2_apache.so.0.0.0 /lib64/liblber-2.4.so.2 liboauth2-apache.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib64/liboauth2_apache.so.0.0.0 /lib64/libpthread.so.0 liboauth2-apache.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib64/liboauth2_apache.so.0.0.0 /lib64/libdl.so.2 liboauth2.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib64/liboauth2.so.0.0.0 /lib64/libssl.so.1.1 9 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 63 warnings. Source checksums ---------------- https://github.com/zmartzone/liboauth2/archive/refs/tags/v1.4.1.tar.gz : CHECKSUM(SHA256) this package : edd1544dd86c4093a01029d555e5d546aa443aba44da3a36a9d65d6731dd84aa CHECKSUM(SHA256) upstream package : edd1544dd86c4093a01029d555e5d546aa443aba44da3a36a9d65d6731dd84aa Requires -------- liboauth2 (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered): libc.so.6()(64bit) libcjose.so.0()(64bit) libcrypto.so.1.1()(64bit) libcrypto.so.1.1(OPENSSL_1_1_0)(64bit) libcurl.so.4()(64bit) libjansson.so.4()(64bit) libssl.so.1.1()(64bit) rtld(GNU_HASH) liboauth2-devel (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered): /usr/bin/pkg-config liboauth2(x86-64) liboauth2.so.0()(64bit) pkgconfig(jansson) pkgconfig(libcrypto) liboauth2-static (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered): liboauth2-devel(x86-64) liboauth2-apache (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered): libapr-1.so.0()(64bit) libaprutil-1.so.0()(64bit) libc.so.6()(64bit) libcrypt.so.2()(64bit) libdl.so.2()(64bit) libexpat.so.1()(64bit) liblber-2.4.so.2()(64bit) libldap_r-2.4.so.2()(64bit) liboauth2(x86-64) libpthread.so.0()(64bit) rtld(GNU_HASH) liboauth2-apache-devel (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered): /usr/bin/pkg-config liboauth2-apache(x86-64) liboauth2-devel(x86-64) liboauth2_apache.so.0()(64bit) pkgconfig(apr-1) pkgconfig(apr-util-1) pkgconfig(liboauth2) liboauth2-apache-static (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered): liboauth2-apache-devel(x86-64) liboauth2-debuginfo (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered): liboauth2-debugsource (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered): Provides -------- liboauth2: liboauth2 liboauth2(x86-64) liboauth2.so.0()(64bit) liboauth2-devel: liboauth2-devel liboauth2-devel(x86-64) pkgconfig(liboauth2) liboauth2-static: liboauth2-static liboauth2-static(x86-64) libtool(/usr/lib64/liboauth2.la) liboauth2-apache: liboauth2-apache liboauth2-apache(x86-64) liboauth2_apache.so.0()(64bit) liboauth2-apache-devel: liboauth2-apache-devel liboauth2-apache-devel(x86-64) pkgconfig(liboauth2_apache) liboauth2-apache-static: liboauth2-apache-static liboauth2-apache-static(x86-64) libtool(/usr/lib64/liboauth2_apache.la) liboauth2-debuginfo: debuginfo(build-id) liboauth2-debuginfo liboauth2-debuginfo(x86-64) liboauth2-debugsource: liboauth2-debugsource liboauth2-debugsource(x86-64) Generated by fedora-review 0.7.6 (b083f91) last change: 2020-11-10 Command line :/usr/bin/fedora-review -v -rn /home/abokovoy/rpmbuild/SRPMS/liboauth2-1.4.1-1.fc34.src.rpm Buildroot used: fedora-rawhide-x86_64 Active plugins: Shell-api, Generic, C/C++ Disabled plugins: Perl, Haskell, Java, PHP, fonts, Python, SugarActivity, R, Ocaml Disabled flags: EPEL6, EPEL7, DISTTAG, BATCH, EXARCH
- Please add a comment about what this patch does / why it is needed. # apache: use include directory from APXS # On Fedora, when building Apache module support, it is not enough to get # APR CFLAGS, we need also APXS include details. Use APXS tool directly. Patch1: liboauth2-apache-fix.patch - Are you sure you need to ship the static libraries? They are generally not provided in Fedora and should be removed at the end of %install. See: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/#packaging-static-libraries - You must not ship the libtool archives (.la). Remove them at the end of install. rm -vf %{buildroot}%{_libdir}/*.la - Just do this: %dir %{_includedir}/oauth2 %{_includedir}/oauth2/cache.h %{_includedir}/oauth2/cfg.h %{_includedir}/oauth2/http.h %{_includedir}/oauth2/ipc.h %{_includedir}/oauth2/jose.h %{_includedir}/oauth2/log.h %{_includedir}/oauth2/mem.h %{_includedir}/oauth2/oauth2.h %{_includedir}/oauth2/openidc.h %{_includedir}/oauth2/proto.h %{_includedir}/oauth2/session.h %{_includedir}/oauth2/util.h %{_includedir}/oauth2/version.h ⇒ %{_includedir}/oauth2 - This: %license LICENSE %doc README.md should only be shipped once per package combination. Since devel subpackages and static subpackages depend on the main package, these should be only shipped in the main package as a result. - Split your BR one per line and consider using pkgconfig() for your devel dependencies: BuildRequires: automake BuildRequires: check BuildRequires: cmake BuildRequires: gcc BuildRequires: httpd-devel BuildRequires: libtool BuildRequires: make BuildRequires: pkgconfig(cjose) BuildRequires: pkgconfig(jansson) BuildRequires: pkgconfig(libcurl) BuildRequires: pkgconfig(openssl) - Use a more specific name for your archive: Source0: %url/archive/v%{version}/%{name}-%{version}.tar.gz - Dist tag should be: Release: 1%{?dist} - There does not seem to be any tests provided: Executing(%check): /bin/sh -e /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.Q5YK8l + umask 022 + cd /builddir/build/BUILD + cd liboauth2-1.4.1 + /usr/bin/make -O -j16 V=1 VERBOSE=1 check /usr/bin/make make[1]: Nothing to be done for 'all'. /usr/bin/make check-TESTS make[2]: Entering directory '/builddir/build/BUILD/liboauth2-1.4.1' ============================================================================ Testsuite summary for liboauth2 1.4.1 ============================================================================ # TOTAL: 0 # PASS: 0 # SKIP: 0 # XFAIL: 0 # FAIL: 0 # XPASS: 0 # ERROR: 0 ============================================================================ make[2]: Leaving directory '/builddir/build/BUILD/liboauth2-1.4.1' Package Review ============== Legend: [x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated [ ] = Manual review needed Issues: ======= - Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la) Note: liboauth2-static : /usr/lib64/liboauth2.la liboauth2-apache-static : /usr/lib64/liboauth2_apache.la See: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging- guidelines/#packaging-static-libraries - Dist tag is present. ===== MUST items ===== C/C++: [x]: Package does not contain kernel modules. [x]: Package contains no static executables. [x]: If your application is a C or C++ application you must list a BuildRequires against gcc, gcc-c++ or clang. [x]: Header files in -devel subpackage, if present. [x]: ldconfig not called in %post and %postun for Fedora 28 and later. [x]: Rpath absent or only used for internal libs. [x]: Development (unversioned) .so files in -devel subpackage, if present. Generic: [x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. [x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses found: "Unknown or generated", "GNU Affero General Public License, Version 3", "GNU Lesser General Public License", "GNU Affero General Public License v3.0 or later". 19 files have unknown license. Detailed output of licensecheck in /home/bob/packaging/review/liboauth2/review- liboauth2/licensecheck.txt [x]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed. [x]: %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise. [x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception. [x]: Changelog in prescribed format. [x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content. [-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application. [x]: Development files must be in a -devel package [x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime. [x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory names). [x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [x]: Package does not generate any conflict. [x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target. [-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and Provides are present. [x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary. [x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English. [-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need. [x]: Useful -debuginfo package or justification otherwise. [x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag. [-]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size (~1MB) or number of files. Note: Documentation size is 61440 bytes in 6 files. [x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines [x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one supported primary architecture. [x]: Package installs properly. [x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces. Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment). [x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %license. [x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses. [x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. [x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT [x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the beginning of %install. [x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time. [x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files. [x]: Permissions on files are set properly. [x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't work. [x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters. [x]: Package does not use a name that already exists. [x]: Package is not relocatable. [x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. [x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. [x]: Static libraries in -static or -devel subpackage, providing -devel if present. Note: Package has .a files: liboauth2-static, liboauth2-apache-static. [x]: File names are valid UTF-8. [x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local ===== SHOULD items ===== Generic: [-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it. [x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments). [x]: Fully versioned dependency in subpackages if applicable. Note: No Requires: %{name}%{?_isa} = %{version}-%{release} in liboauth2-static , liboauth2-apache-devel , liboauth2-apache-static [?]: Package functions as described. [x]: Latest version is packaged. [x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream. [!]: Patches link to upstream bugs/comments/lists or are otherwise justified. [-]: Sources are verified with gpgverify first in %prep if upstream publishes signatures. Note: gpgverify is not used. [-]: Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. [x]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. [x]: %check is present and all tests pass. [x]: Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed files. [x]: Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. [x]: Buildroot is not present [x]: Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) [x]: No file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, /usr/sbin. [x]: Packager, Vendor, PreReq, Copyright tags should not be in spec file [x]: The placement of pkgconfig(.pc) files are correct. [x]: Sources can be downloaded from URI in Source: tag [x]: SourceX is a working URL. [x]: Spec use %global instead of %define unless justified. ===== EXTRA items ===== Generic: [x]: Rpmlint is run on debuginfo package(s). Note: No rpmlint messages. [x]: Rpmlint is run on all installed packages. Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment). [x]: Large data in /usr/share should live in a noarch subpackage if package is arched. [x]: Package should not use obsolete m4 macros [x]: Spec file according to URL is the same as in SRPM. Rpmlint ------- Checking: liboauth2-1.4.1-1.fc35.x86_64.rpm liboauth2-devel-1.4.1-1.fc35.x86_64.rpm liboauth2-static-1.4.1-1.fc35.x86_64.rpm liboauth2-apache-1.4.1-1.fc35.x86_64.rpm liboauth2-apache-devel-1.4.1-1.fc35.x86_64.rpm liboauth2-apache-static-1.4.1-1.fc35.x86_64.rpm liboauth2-debuginfo-1.4.1-1.fc35.x86_64.rpm liboauth2-debugsource-1.4.1-1.fc35.x86_64.rpm liboauth2-1.4.1-1.fc35.src.rpm liboauth2-apache.x86_64: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) OAuth -> Oath, Coauthor liboauth2-apache.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US OAuth -> Oath, Coauthor 9 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings.
Thank you for the review, it is helpful. I removed static variants as you suggested, we indeed don't need them. I fixed the rest as well except contracting the include files because there is an explicit split to have /usr/include/oauth2/apache.h in a separate subpackage. I did instead created a file list and filtered apache.h out of it. Once ngnix packaging in Fedora will allow building modules dynamically, I will only need to filter out nginx.h to add support for it. Tests were not running because 'check' dependency is not enough, we need 'pkgconfig(check)' as well. ... checking for CHECK... yes ... make[1]: Leaving directory '/builddir/build/BUILD/liboauth2-1.4.1' /usr/bin/make check-TESTS make[2]: Entering directory '/builddir/build/BUILD/liboauth2-1.4.1' PASS: check_liboauth2 make[2]: Leaving directory '/builddir/build/BUILD/liboauth2-1.4.1' make[2]: Entering directory '/builddir/build/BUILD/liboauth2-1.4.1' ============================================================================ Testsuite summary for liboauth2 1.4.1 ============================================================================ # TOTAL: 1 # PASS: 1 # SKIP: 0 # XFAIL: 0 # FAIL: 0 # XPASS: 0 # ERROR: 0 ============================================================================ make[2]: Leaving directory '/builddir/build/BUILD/liboauth2-1.4.1' A new spec file can be picked from https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/abbra/oauth2-support/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/02141226-liboauth2/liboauth2.spec
Package approved.
Thanks, opened https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/33630 to request a repo
(fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/liboauth2
Branches requested: F34: https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/33635 F33: https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/33636 F32: https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/33637
FEDORA-2021-ea987e2c4e has been submitted as an update to Fedora 34. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-ea987e2c4e
FEDORA-2021-d2f9b03afb has been submitted as an update to Fedora 33. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-d2f9b03afb
FEDORA-2021-93a2598464 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 32. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-93a2598464
FEDORA-2021-ea987e2c4e has been pushed to the Fedora 34 testing repository. Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command: `sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing --advisory=FEDORA-2021-ea987e2c4e` You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-ea987e2c4e See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates.
FEDORA-2021-93a2598464 has been pushed to the Fedora 32 testing repository. Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command: `sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing --advisory=FEDORA-2021-93a2598464` You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-93a2598464 See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates.
FEDORA-2021-d2f9b03afb has been pushed to the Fedora 33 testing repository. Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command: `sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing --advisory=FEDORA-2021-d2f9b03afb` You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-d2f9b03afb See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates.
FEDORA-2021-ea987e2c4e has been pushed to the Fedora 34 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.
FEDORA-2021-d2f9b03afb has been pushed to the Fedora 33 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.
FEDORA-2021-93a2598464 has been pushed to the Fedora 32 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.