Bug 19525 - "Messy" symbolic links
"Messy" symbolic links
Status: CLOSED NOTABUG
Product: Red Hat Linux
Classification: Retired
Component: XFree86 (Show other bugs)
7.0
i386 Linux
low Severity medium
: ---
: ---
Assigned To: Mike A. Harris
David Lawrence
: FutureFeature
Depends On:
Blocks:
  Show dependency treegraph
 
Reported: 2000-10-21 15:49 EDT by tim.landscheidt
Modified: 2007-03-26 23:36 EDT (History)
1 user (show)

See Also:
Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Enhancement
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2000-12-10 22:20:03 EST
Type: ---
Regression: ---
Mount Type: ---
Documentation: ---
CRM:
Verified Versions:
Category: ---
oVirt Team: ---
RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: ---


Attachments (Terms of Use)

  None (edit)
Description tim.landscheidt 2000-10-21 15:49:32 EDT
symlinks is disturbed by the following "messy" symbolic links in
XFree86-4.0.1-1.i386.rpm and XFree86-xfs-4.0.1-1.i386.rpm:

/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/xinit -> ../../../.././etc/X11/xinit
/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/xsm -> ../../../.././etc/X11/xsm
/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fs -> ../../../.././etc/X11/fs

The "/./" is the culprit.
Comment 1 Daniel Roesen 2000-10-24 06:45:29 EDT
although it's not nice, it should have no bad side effects at all.
Comment 2 Tim Landscheidt 2000-12-10 22:20:00 EST
That's why I chose "Severity: Enhancement" which is not printed under
"Additional Information" BTW (a bug in Bugzilla?) :-).
Comment 3 Mike A. Harris 2001-02-19 08:57:37 EST
Considering the pros and cons of using absolute vs. relative symlinks,
we have come to the conclusion that there is no solution that will please
everyone in every case.  Since it cannot be both ways, we are leaving it
the way it is, which we consider the least of 2 evils.

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.