Bug 1952811 - Adding OSD's by using "advanced OSD services" not exist in ceph-5 Administration Guide
Summary: Adding OSD's by using "advanced OSD services" not exist in ceph-5 Administr...
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat Ceph Storage
Classification: Red Hat Storage
Component: Documentation
Version: 5.0
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
unspecified
high
Target Milestone: ---
: 5.0
Assignee: Ranjini M N
QA Contact: skanta
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks: 1929147
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2021-04-23 08:27 UTC by skanta
Modified: 2021-09-18 17:37 UTC (History)
4 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2021-09-16 13:40:47 UTC
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)


Links
System ID Private Priority Status Summary Last Updated
Red Hat Issue Tracker RHCEPH-1776 0 None None None 2021-09-18 17:37:56 UTC

Description skanta 2021-04-23 08:27:02 UTC
Describe the issue: In the ceph-5 administration guide, Adding OSD's by using the advanced OSD services does not exist. 

This feature is newly added in ceph 5. Please check the below upstream doc for further details.

https://docs.ceph.com/en/latest/cephadm/osd/#advanced-osd-service-specifications



Describe the task you were trying to accomplish:

Suggestions for improvement:

Document URL: https://access.redhat.com/documentation/en-us/red_hat_ceph_storage/5/html-single/administration_guide/index?lb_target=preview

Chapter/Section Number and Title:

Product Version:

Environment Details:

Any other versions of this document that also needs this update:

Additional information:

Comment 2 skanta 2021-06-07 05:04:29 UTC
As per the upstream document, there are the following ways to deploy OSD's using advanced service specifications.

1.Rotational
============

       If rotational =1 then OSD will be configured with  SSD's/NVME's.If rotational=0 then the configuration will happen with HDD's. 
       Please explain in details about the how limit option can be used in the above case.

       Refer- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1949467.

2.Size
======
   There are no details mentioned about the size.
   Size options which 5.0 supports-
              LOW:HIGH
                 :HIGH
              LOW:
              EXACT   
   In the document please explain what exactly is the LOW, HIGH, and EXACT 
   
 There exist a bug on this feature- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1946156 

3.MODEL
=======

    There are so many ways we get the model name. The naming convention is different for different commands.
     For example:
                   1.lsblk -o NAME,FSTYPE,LABEL,MOUNTPOINT,SIZE,MODEL
                   2.smartctl -i /dev/sdb

     From the above two commands, we can get the model name. The convention is different.

     In this case, we have to inform to the customers that use "ceph orch device ls --wide" command to get the details. This information is provided by integration with libstoragemgmt. By default, this integration is disabled.
     To enable customer need to execute  "ceph config set mgr mgr/cephadm/device_enhanced_scan true"  command.

     
      Reference for the DOC- https://docs.ceph.com/en/latest/cephadm/osd/#list-devices
 
      Few more details exist at-  https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1944527

4. Vendor
=========
        
     There exist a few limitations to the vendor option.
     Please refer- 
                   1.https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1946417
                   2.https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1949359

5.Device path
=============
               specify directly device paths in specific hosts   
  

6.Limit option
===============

           Please refer -https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1949467
   


Please refer- https://docs.ceph.com/en/latest/cephadm/osd/

The hyper link mentioned at "See the Advanced service specifications and filters for deploying OSDs section in the Red Hat Ceph Storage Operations Guide." is navigating to CEPH-4 Documnet.

Comment 4 skanta 2021-06-10 00:34:52 UTC
LGTM and moving to the verified state.


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.