Description of problem: The DOCUMENTATION_URL provided in /etc/os-release is incorrect because the 'f' prefix is missing from the spec variable, doc_version. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): How reproducible: Steps to Reproduce: 1. Install Fedora 34 2. `cat /etc/os-release` Actual results: $ cat /etc/os-release | grep DOCUMENTATION_URL DOCUMENTATION_URL="https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fedora/34/system-administrators-guide/" Expected results: $ cat /etc/os-release | grep DOCUMENTATION_URL DOCUMENTATION_URL="https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fedora/f34/system-administrators-guide/" Additional info: I went to the relevant source file to track down the bug which can be found here: define doc_version: https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/fedora-release/blob/f34/f/fedora-release.spec#_7 Specify DOCUMENTATION_URL, utilizing doc_version: https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/fedora-release/blob/f34/f/fedora-release.spec#_773
It's worth noting that both the incorrect, "34" URL and the correct, "f34" URL, both return a 404 at present. I'm under the assumption that the Fedora 34 SysAdmin guide is either inaccessible to the public or has yet to be generated. Given the history of the project and the source code comment, I have assumed/extrapolated what the correct URL will be in the future. Fedora 32, SysAdmin Guide: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fedora/f32/system-administrators-guide/ Fedora 33, ": https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fedora/f33/system-administrators-guide/ Fedora 34, ": https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fedora/f34/system-administrators-guide/ Fedora Rawhide, ": https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fedora/rawhide/system-administrators-guide/
Version-Release number: 34-1 $ sudo dnf info fedora-release-common Last metadata expiration check: 0:28:34 ago on Fri 23 Apr 2021 12:25:24 PM PDT. Installed Packages Name : fedora-release-common Version : 34 Release : 1 Architecture : noarch Size : 16 k Source : fedora-release-34-1.src.rpm Repository : @System From repo : updates-testing Summary : Fedora release files URL : https://fedoraproject.org/ License : MIT Description : Release files common to all Editions and Spins of Fedora
*** Bug 1954320 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
FEDORA-2021-0ed8ffea53 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 34. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-0ed8ffea53
FEDORA-2021-0ed8ffea53 has been pushed to the Fedora 34 testing repository. Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command: `sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing --advisory=FEDORA-2021-0ed8ffea53` You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-0ed8ffea53 See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates.
Results after the new update: cat /etc/os-release NAME=Fedora VERSION="34 (KDE Plasma)" ID=fedora VERSION_ID=34 VERSION_CODENAME="" PLATFORM_ID="platform:f34" PRETTY_NAME="Fedora 34 (KDE Plasma)" ANSI_COLOR="0;38;2;60;110;180" LOGO=fedora-logo-icon CPE_NAME="cpe:/o:fedoraproject:fedora:34" HOME_URL="https://fedoraproject.org/" DOCUMENTATION_URL="https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fedora/f34/system-administrators-guide/" SUPPORT_URL="https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicating_and_getting_help" BUG_REPORT_URL="https://bugzilla.redhat.com/" REDHAT_BUGZILLA_PRODUCT="Fedora" REDHAT_BUGZILLA_PRODUCT_VERSION=34 REDHAT_SUPPORT_PRODUCT="Fedora" REDHAT_SUPPORT_PRODUCT_VERSION=34 PRIVACY_POLICY_URL="https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Legal:PrivacyPolicy" VARIANT="KDE Plasma" VARIANT_ID=kde dnf info fedora-release-common Pacotes instalados Nome : fedora-release-common Versão : 34 Lançamento : 36 Arquitetura : noarch Tamanho : 16 k Origem : fedora-release-34-36.src.rpm Repositório : @System A partir do : updates-testing Resumo : Fedora release files URL : https://fedoraproject.org/ Licença : MIT Descrição : Release files common to all Editions and Spins of Fedora
FEDORA-2021-0ed8ffea53 has been pushed to the Fedora 34 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.