Spec URL: https://github.com/grosjo/fts-xapian/blob/master/PACKAGES/RPM/fts-xapian.spec SRPM URL: https://github.com/grosjo/fts-xapian/blob/master/PACKAGES/RPM/dovecot-fts-xapian-1.4.9b-1.fc34.src.rpm Description: This project intends to provide a straightforward, simple and maintenance free, way to configure FTS plugin for Dovecot, leveraging the efforts by the Xapian.org team. This effort came after Dovecot team decided to deprecate "fts_squat" included in the dovecot core, and due to the complexity of the Solr plugin capabilitles, un-needed for most users. This is my first package, and I am seeking a sponsor. Fedora Account System Username: grosjo Blocks : FE-NEEDSPONSOR
- You must include a license file and should include any documentation: %files %license COPYING %doc AUTHORS README.md %{_libdir}/dovecot/lib21_fts_xapian_plugin.so - Please include a valid changelog entry with your name and stuff: %changelog * Tue Apr 6 2021 Joan Moreau <jom> - 1.49b-1 - Initial RPM - The SPEC filename, the SPEC name, and the bug report name must be the same. Please change the filename of the spec to match the rest. - The Source0 is 404: Downloading: https://github.com/grosjo/fts-xapian/archive/refs/tags/fts-xapian-1.4.9b.tar.gz Download failed: 404 Client Error: Not Found for url: https://codeload.github.com/grosjo/fts-xapian/tar.gz/refs/tags/fts-xapian-1.4.9b - 0.0 B Elapsed Time: 0:00:00 Please use instead: Source0: %{url}/archive/%{version}/%{name}-%{version}.tar.gz - Typo in description: spelling-error %description -l en_US capabilitles -> capabilities, capability - [!]: Package should not use obsolete m4 macros Note: Some obsoleted macros found, see the attachment. See: https://fedorahosted.org/FedoraReview/wiki/AutoTools AutoTools: Obsoleted m4s found ------------------------------ AC_PROG_LIBTOOL found in: fts-xapian-1.4.9b/configure.ac:22 AC_PROG_LIBTOOL should be replaced with LT_INIT. See https://www.gnu.org/software/libtool/manual/html_node/LT_005fINIT.html Package Review ============== Legend: [x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated [ ] = Manual review needed ===== MUST items ===== C/C++: [x]: Package does not contain kernel modules. [x]: Package contains no static executables. [x]: Development (unversioned) .so files in -devel subpackage, if present. Note: Unversioned so-files in private %_libdir subdirectory (see attachment). Verify they are not in ld path. [x]: If your application is a C or C++ application you must list a BuildRequires against gcc, gcc-c++ or clang. [x]: Header files in -devel subpackage, if present. [x]: Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la) [x]: Rpath absent or only used for internal libs. Generic: [x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. [!]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %license. [x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses found: "Unknown or generated", "GNU Lesser General Public License, Version 2.1". 17 files have unknown license. Detailed output of licensecheck in /home/bob/packaging/review/dovecot-fts-xapian/review- dovecot-fts-xapian/licensecheck.txt [!]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed. [x]: %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise. [x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception. [x]: Changelog in prescribed format. [x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content. [-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application. [-]: Development files must be in a -devel package [x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime. [x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory names). [x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [x]: Package does not generate any conflict. [x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target. [-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and Provides are present. [x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary. [x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English. [-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need. [x]: Useful -debuginfo package or justification otherwise. [x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag. [x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines [x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one supported primary architecture. [x]: Package installs properly. [x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces. Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment). [x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses. [x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. [x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT [x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the beginning of %install. [x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time. [x]: Dist tag is present. [x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files. [x]: Permissions on files are set properly. [x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't work. [x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters. [x]: Package does not use a name that already exists. [x]: Package is not relocatable. [x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. [x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. [x]: File names are valid UTF-8. [x]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size (~1MB) or number of files. Note: Documentation size is 0 bytes in 0 files. [x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local ===== SHOULD items ===== Generic: [-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it. [x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments). [?]: Package functions as described. [x]: Latest version is packaged. [x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream. [-]: Sources are verified with gpgverify first in %prep if upstream publishes signatures. Note: gpgverify is not used. [-]: Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. [x]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. [-]: %check is present and all tests pass. [x]: Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed files. [x]: Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. [x]: Buildroot is not present [x]: Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) [x]: No file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, /usr/sbin. [x]: Fully versioned dependency in subpackages if applicable. [x]: Packager, Vendor, PreReq, Copyright tags should not be in spec file [x]: Sources can be downloaded from URI in Source: tag [x]: SourceX is a working URL. [x]: Spec use %global instead of %define unless justified. ===== EXTRA items ===== Generic: [!]: Package should not use obsolete m4 macros Note: Some obsoleted macros found, see the attachment. See: https://fedorahosted.org/FedoraReview/wiki/AutoTools [x]: Rpmlint is run on debuginfo package(s). Note: No rpmlint messages. [x]: Rpmlint is run on all installed packages. Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment). [x]: Large data in /usr/share should live in a noarch subpackage if package is arched. [x]: Spec file according to URL is the same as in SRPM. Rpmlint ------- Checking: dovecot-fts-xapian-1.4.9b-1.fc35.x86_64.rpm dovecot-fts-xapian-debuginfo-1.4.9b-1.fc35.x86_64.rpm dovecot-fts-xapian-debugsource-1.4.9b-1.fc35.x86_64.rpm dovecot-fts-xapian-1.4.9b-1.fc35.src.rpm dovecot-fts-xapian.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US capabilitles -> capabilities, capability dovecot-fts-xapian.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US un -> UN, nu, in dovecot-fts-xapian.x86_64: W: incoherent-version-in-changelog apian ['1.4.9b-1.fc35', '1.4.9b-1'] dovecot-fts-xapian.x86_64: W: no-documentation dovecot-fts-xapian.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US capabilitles -> capabilities, capability dovecot-fts-xapian.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US un -> UN, nu, in 4 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 6 warnings.
Can you check updates ? https://github.com/grosjo/fts-xapian/tree/1.4.10/PACKAGES/RPM Thank you
Uploading srpm: ./dovecot-fts-xapian-1.4.10-1.fc34.src.rpm [====================================] 100% 00:00:11 999.95 KiB 86.34 KiB/sec Created task: 70868316 Task info: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=70868316 Watching tasks (this may be safely interrupted)... 70868316 build (f34, dovecot-fts-xapian-1.4.10-1.fc34.src.rpm): free 70868316 build (f34, dovecot-fts-xapian-1.4.10-1.fc34.src.rpm): free -> open (buildvm-x86-09.iad2.fedoraproject.org) 70868321 rebuildSRPM (noarch): free 70868321 rebuildSRPM (noarch): free -> open (buildvm-x86-17.iad2.fedoraproject.org) 70868403 buildArch (dovecot-fts-xapian-1.4.10-1.fc34.src.rpm, i686): free 70868405 buildArch (dovecot-fts-xapian-1.4.10-1.fc34.src.rpm, x86_64): free 70868410 buildArch (dovecot-fts-xapian-1.4.10-1.fc34.src.rpm, s390x): open (buildvm-s390x-22.s390.fedoraproject.org) 70868402 buildArch (dovecot-fts-xapian-1.4.10-1.fc34.src.rpm, armv7hl): open (buildvm-a32-12.iad2.fedoraproject.org) 70868407 buildArch (dovecot-fts-xapian-1.4.10-1.fc34.src.rpm, aarch64): open (buildvm-a64-26.iad2.fedoraproject.org) 70868408 buildArch (dovecot-fts-xapian-1.4.10-1.fc34.src.rpm, ppc64le): open (buildvm-ppc64le-04.iad2.fedoraproject.org) 70868321 rebuildSRPM (noarch): open (buildvm-x86-17.iad2.fedoraproject.org) -> closed 2 free 5 open 1 done 0 failed 70868403 buildArch (dovecot-fts-xapian-1.4.10-1.fc34.src.rpm, i686): free -> open (buildvm-x86-07.iad2.fedoraproject.org) 70868405 buildArch (dovecot-fts-xapian-1.4.10-1.fc34.src.rpm, x86_64): free -> open (buildvm-x86-03.iad2.fedoraproject.org) 70868410 buildArch (dovecot-fts-xapian-1.4.10-1.fc34.src.rpm, s390x): open (buildvm-s390x-22.s390.fedoraproject.org) -> closed 0 free 6 open 2 done 0 failed 70868403 buildArch (dovecot-fts-xapian-1.4.10-1.fc34.src.rpm, i686): open (buildvm-x86-07.iad2.fedoraproject.org) -> closed 0 free 5 open 3 done 0 failed 70868405 buildArch (dovecot-fts-xapian-1.4.10-1.fc34.src.rpm, x86_64): open (buildvm-x86-03.iad2.fedoraproject.org) -> closed 0 free 4 open 4 done 0 failed 70868408 buildArch (dovecot-fts-xapian-1.4.10-1.fc34.src.rpm, ppc64le): open (buildvm-ppc64le-04.iad2.fedoraproject.org) -> closed 0 free 3 open 5 done 0 failed 70868407 buildArch (dovecot-fts-xapian-1.4.10-1.fc34.src.rpm, aarch64): open (buildvm-a64-26.iad2.fedoraproject.org) -> closed 0 free 2 open 6 done 0 failed 70868402 buildArch (dovecot-fts-xapian-1.4.10-1.fc34.src.rpm, armv7hl): open (buildvm-a32-12.iad2.fedoraproject.org) -> closed 0 free 1 open 7 done 0 failed 70868316 build (f34, dovecot-fts-xapian-1.4.10-1.fc34.src.rpm): open (buildvm-x86-09.iad2.fedoraproject.org) -> closed 0 free 0 open 8 done 0 failed 70868316 build (f34, dovecot-fts-xapian-1.4.10-1.fc34.src.rpm) completed succes
Spec URL: https://github.com/grosjo/fts-xapian/blob/master/PACKAGES/RPM/dovecot-fts-xapian.spec SRPM URL: https://github.com/grosjo/fts-xapian/blob/master/PACKAGES/RPM/dovecot-fts-xapian-1.4.10-1.fc34.src.rpm
Sorry I seem to have missed this bug in my mail. Don't hesitate to use Needinfo in this casd. The package is approved. However you still nedd to find a sponsor to be aloozed into the packager group, https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_get_sponsored_into_the_packager_group
In practical terms, how to move forward ("get a sponsor" is just a foggy stuff -> I am just willing to resolve a request (https://github.com/grosjo/fts-xapian/issues/82 ), not planning to "show my expertise" What is "needinfo" ? Can you help with moving this forward ? Or how can I sponsor myself ?
(In reply to Joan Moreau from comment #6) > In practical terms, how to move forward ("get a sponsor" is just a foggy > stuff -> I am just willing to resolve a request > (https://github.com/grosjo/fts-xapian/issues/82 ), not planning to "show my > expertise" > We don't just allow anybody into the packager group, you need to be vetted, by showing you understand the packaging guidelines, > What is "needinfo" ? Below the reply text area, there is a check box with "Need additional information from" > > Can you help with moving this forward ? > I've sent you a mail regarding sponsorship but I haven't heard back from you.
Spec URL: https://github.com/grosjo/fts-xapian/blob/master/PACKAGES/RPM/dovecot-fts-xapian.spec SRPM URL: https://github.com/grosjo/fts-xapian/blob/master/PACKAGES/RPM/dovecot-fts-xapian-1.4.10a-1.fc34.src.rpm
I don't really plan to "show my worth" but just willing to maintain this small and usefull package
ANyone can help to push this RPM into the reps ? thank you
Hi Joan, I've sponsored you to the package maintainers group now. Welcome to the the community! Please log in (or back out and in if necessary) to src.fedoraproject.org. That triggers a sync with the accounts system and will give you the necessary permissions. You can now continue from here: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Join_the_package_collection_maintainers#Add_Package_to_Source_Code_Management_.28SCM.29_system_and_Set_Owner Please feel free to e-mail me if you need any help with your package(s). Cheers, Ankur
Hi Ankur, Trying to login in https://src.fedoraproject.org/ as mentioned on the link you sent I get: OpenID request was cancelled
Infrastructure is currently seeing intermittent issues with the Fedora Open ID server. See https://status.fedoraproject.org/ and https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/9990 Someone has reported: "Clearing the local storage and cookies, seems to fix the problem most of the times.", try that and see if it works?
yes did that using Firefox 91 (archlinux) same result
Sorry, you'll have to try later. Not much I can do with the infra issue :/ I tend to always be logged in using SSO, so I haven't run this into this yet. Try that perhaps: https://fedoramagazine.org/set-up-single-sign-on-for-fedora-project-services/ You should also be able to get a Kubernetes ticket using the command line: kinit <username>@FEDORAPROJECT.ORG More info here: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/Kerberos
I managed to log in I reach the following screen grosjo Packages 0 Activity Groups 1 Watchlist 0 My Packages You have no Packages
Great. You're in: https://src.fedoraproject.org/user/grosjo you can now proceed with requesting the SCM repository for your package and so on: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Join_the_package_collection_maintainers#Add_Package_to_Source_Code_Management_.28SCM.29_system_and_Set_Owner Cheers,
$ fedpkg request-repo dovecot-fts-xapian 1953340 https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/36466
(fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/dovecot-fts-xapian
I get: $ fedpkg clone dovecot-fts-xapian Cloning into 'dovecot-fts-xapian'... grosjo.org: Permission denied (publickey). fatal: Could not read from remote repository. Please make sure you have the correct access rights and the repository exists. Could not execute clone: Failed to execute command.
The clone works for me, so the repo seems to be set up correctly. I can't check on the account system if you uploaded your public SSH key there, so that'll be the first thing to check. Then, if you have multiple keys (for example I have a separate one for Fedora tasks), you'll have to configure ssh to point out what key you are using for what service. So, your ~/.ssh/config file will have something like this in it: HOST *.fedoraproject.org fedorapeople.org *.pagure.io IdentityFile <full path to your private ssh key file> User <your Fedora username>
Ok, it works now. I get a forlder with a README.md in it WHat shall I do with it ?
Regenerating my SRPM file, I get error: Failed build dependencies: gcc-c++ is needed by dovecot-fts-xapian-1.4.12-1.fc34.x86_64 WHereas it was working fine some weeks ago
log on hte build also shows another error (and I have no power over it) DEBUG util.py:446: Created symlink /etc/systemd/system/dbus.service → /usr/lib/systemd/system/dbus-broker.service. DEBUG util.py:446: Created symlink /etc/systemd/user/dbus.service → /usr/lib/systemd/user/dbus-broker.service. DEBUG util.py:446: useradd warning: dovecot's uid 97 outside of the SYS_UID_MIN 201 and SYS_UID_MAX 999 range. DEBUG util.py:444: Error in POSTIN scriptlet in rpm package dovecot
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=74674695
I managed to solve the "gcc-c++" error Package building works fine on my VM (using "QA_RPATHS=$(( 0x0001|0x0010 )) rpmbuild --bb --nodebuginfo ~/rpmbuild/SPECS/dovecot-fts-xapian.spec") When using "fedpkg build" -> I get errors https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=74684272
I added "%global __brp_check_rpaths %{nil}" in the spec file according to https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Broken_RPATH_will_fail_rpmbuild This fixed the issue So I get the following. What is next ? Building dovecot-fts-xapian-1.4.12-1.fc36 for rawhide Created task: 74686191 Task info: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=74686191 Watching tasks (this may be safely interrupted)... 74686191 build (rawhide, /rpms/dovecot-fts-xapian.git:27e075a3e72251a9b46d43524041ad441e38430f): free 74686191 build (rawhide, /rpms/dovecot-fts-xapian.git:27e075a3e72251a9b46d43524041ad441e38430f): free -> open (buildvm-s390x-24.s390.fedoraproject.org) 74686194 buildSRPMFromSCM (/rpms/dovecot-fts-xapian.git:27e075a3e72251a9b46d43524041ad441e38430f): open (buildvm-ppc64le-40.iad2.fedoraproject.org) 74686458 buildArch (dovecot-fts-xapian-1.4.12-1.fc36.src.rpm, armv7hl): open (buildvm-a32-19.iad2.fedoraproject.org) 74686462 buildArch (dovecot-fts-xapian-1.4.12-1.fc36.src.rpm, ppc64le): free 74686459 buildArch (dovecot-fts-xapian-1.4.12-1.fc36.src.rpm, i686): open (buildhw-x86-13.iad2.fedoraproject.org) 74686461 buildArch (dovecot-fts-xapian-1.4.12-1.fc36.src.rpm, aarch64): open (buildvm-a64-27.iad2.fedoraproject.org) 74686460 buildArch (dovecot-fts-xapian-1.4.12-1.fc36.src.rpm, x86_64): open (buildhw-x86-13.iad2.fedoraproject.org) 74686463 buildArch (dovecot-fts-xapian-1.4.12-1.fc36.src.rpm, s390x): open (buildvm-s390x-23.s390.fedoraproject.org) 74686194 buildSRPMFromSCM (/rpms/dovecot-fts-xapian.git:27e075a3e72251a9b46d43524041ad441e38430f): open (buildvm-ppc64le-40.iad2.fedoraproject.org) -> closed 1 free 6 open 1 done 0 failed 74686462 buildArch (dovecot-fts-xapian-1.4.12-1.fc36.src.rpm, ppc64le): free -> open (buildvm-ppc64le-21.iad2.fedoraproject.org) 74686459 buildArch (dovecot-fts-xapian-1.4.12-1.fc36.src.rpm, i686): open (buildhw-x86-13.iad2.fedoraproject.org) -> closed 0 free 6 open 2 done 0 failed 74686460 buildArch (dovecot-fts-xapian-1.4.12-1.fc36.src.rpm, x86_64): open (buildhw-x86-13.iad2.fedoraproject.org) -> closed 0 free 5 open 3 done 0 failed 74686463 buildArch (dovecot-fts-xapian-1.4.12-1.fc36.src.rpm, s390x): open (buildvm-s390x-23.s390.fedoraproject.org) -> closed 0 free 4 open 4 done 0 failed 74686462 buildArch (dovecot-fts-xapian-1.4.12-1.fc36.src.rpm, ppc64le): open (buildvm-ppc64le-21.iad2.fedoraproject.org) -> closed 0 free 3 open 5 done 0 failed 74686461 buildArch (dovecot-fts-xapian-1.4.12-1.fc36.src.rpm, aarch64): open (buildvm-a64-27.iad2.fedoraproject.org) -> closed 0 free 2 open 6 done 0 failed 74686191 build (rawhide, /rpms/dovecot-fts-xapian.git:27e075a3e72251a9b46d43524041ad441e38430f): open (buildvm-s390x-24.s390.fedoraproject.org) -> closed 0 free 1 open 7 done 0 failed 74686650 tagBuild (noarch): closed 74686458 buildArch (dovecot-fts-xapian-1.4.12-1.fc36.src.rpm, armv7hl): open (buildvm-a32-19.iad2.fedoraproject.org) -> closed 0 free 0 open 9 done 0 failed 74686191 build (rawhide, /rpms/dovecot-fts-xapian.git:27e075a3e72251a9b46d43524041ad441e38430f) completed successfully
If all this is OK, how to push the RPM to f34 et f35 ? https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/dovecot-fts-xapian
Maybe this URL is of help: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Package_maintenance_guide
Pb is as follows: $ fedpkg switch-branch f35 Could not execute switch_branch: Unknown remote branch origin/f35
https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/36603
It seems things are now working properly Is the RPM now available in the diferent releases ? (f34/35/36/epel7/epel8) ?
Hi Joan, For all branches other than rawhide, you need to: - request a branch - build your package - push an update https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/packageinfo?packageID=34417 shows that you've built for F34/F35/F36 but I don't see updates for F34/F35 yet, so that will be the next step there: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/?packages=dovecot-fts-xapian Please see the links given for commands and so on: - https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Package_maintenance_guide - https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Join_the_package_collection_maintainers#Submit_Package_as_Update_in_Bodhi Your build for el7 failed, so you'll have to fix that and then push an update etc. Please do note that the guidelines and pipeline for EL are not identical to Fedora releases, so if you are looking to make your packages available on EL, you also need to take a look at their guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/EPEL:Packaging Additional note: Since you're opting out of the rpath check, you need to add a comment to your spec explaining this (as documented here): https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Broken_RPATH_will_fail_rpmbuild#Opting_out https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/dovecot-fts-xapian/blob/rawhide/f/dovecot-fts-xapian.spec#_1 The guideline for rpath is here: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/#_beware_of_rpath (As noted there also, if it's just an internal library, noting that is sufficient) Cheers,
Hi I understood that bottom line, I need to type "fedpkg update" , right ? I get : $ git checkout f35 Switched to branch 'f35' Your branch is up to date with 'origin/f35'. $ fedpkg update Could not execute update: Could not generate update request: Missing update type, which is required to create update. A copy of the filled in template is saved as bodhi.template.last What should I do ? thank you
Take a look at `fedpkg update --help`. Without any arguments, it should open up a text editor for you to fill in the template interactively. It may look at your $EDITOR environment variable to figure out what editor to use. Worth checking if that is set. You can also use the bodhi web-interface to push updates. I prefer this for new packages because you can add all the new builds there and it'll split it into different updates for each Fedora release itself. Using `fedpkg update`, you'll have to run it for each branch manually. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/new Cheers,
HI I am trying to update the package. Nothing works anymore. I am trying > fedpkg prep I get : > sources file doesn't exist. Source files download skipped. > error: Bad source: /home/joan/fts-xapian/PACKAGES/RPM/fedora/dovecot-fts-xapian/dovecot-fts-xapian-1.5.1.tar.gz: No such file or directory Something I am doing wrong somewhere Can you help ?
I reach the following for fc35, running fedpkg build Teh error does /not/ happen for rawhide Mock Version: 2.12 ENTER ['do_with_status'](['bash', '--login', '-c', '/usr/bin/rpmbuild -bs --target noarch --nodeps /builddir/build/SPECS/dovecot-fts-xapian.spec'], chrootPath='/var/lib/mock/f35-build-31195302-4264299/root'env={'TERM': 'vt100', 'SHELL': '/bin/bash', 'HOME': '/builddir', 'HOSTNAME': 'mock', 'PATH': '/usr/bin:/bin:/usr/sbin:/sbin', 'PROMPT_COMMAND': 'printf "\\033]0;<mock-chroot>\\007"', 'PS1': '<mock-chroot> \\s-\\v\\$ ', 'LANG': 'C.UTF-8'}shell=Falselogger=<mockbuild.trace_decorator.getLog object at 0x7f0da746d1f0>timeout=201600uid=1000gid=425user='mockbuild'nspawn_args=[]unshare_net=FalseprintOutput=False) Executing command: ['bash', '--login', '-c', '/usr/bin/rpmbuild -bs --target noarch --nodeps /builddir/build/SPECS/dovecot-fts-xapian.spec'] with env {'TERM': 'vt100', 'SHELL': '/bin/bash', 'HOME': '/builddir', 'HOSTNAME': 'mock', 'PATH': '/usr/bin:/bin:/usr/sbin:/sbin', 'PROMPT_COMMAND': 'printf "\\033]0;<mock-chroot>\\007"', 'PS1': '<mock-chroot> \\s-\\v\\$ ', 'LANG': 'C.UTF-8'} and shell False error: Bad source: /builddir/build/SOURCES/dovecot-fts-xapian-1.5.1.tar.gz: No such file or directory Building target platforms: noarch Building for target noarch Child return code was: 1 EXCEPTION: [Error()] Traceback (most recent call last): File "/usr/lib/python3.9/site-packages/mockbuild/trace_decorator.py", line 93, in trace result = func(*args, **kw) File "/usr/lib/python3.9/site-packages/mockbuild/util.py", line 600, in do_with_status raise exception.Error("Command failed: \n # %s\n%s" % (command, output), child.returncode) mockbuild.exception.Error: Command failed: # bash --login -c /usr/bin/rpmbuild -bs --target noarch --nodeps /builddir/build/SPECS/dovecot-fts-xapian.spec
Hi running fedpkg build recently, I reach: configure: error: in `/builddir/build/BUILD/fts-xapian-1.5.4b': configure: error: C compiler cannot create executables See `config.log' for more details error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.rcC7KS (%prep) Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.rcC7KS (%prep) RPM build errors: Child return code was: 1 EXCEPTION: [Error()] details here : https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//work/tasks/6697/83686697/build.log Can you help ? Thank you
The package is now orphaned, closing this old review ticket.