Description of problem: using oc volume set ... --claim-class=<...> does not set the `storageClassName:` in the created pvc which in turn makes this volume not eligible for snapshots as the VolumeSnaphotClass has a dependency to the original storage class Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): ocp 4.6.24 with OCS 4.6 or OCS 4.7 (rc) ocp 4.7.7 with OCS 4.7 (rc) How reproducible: Steps to Reproduce: 1. create OCP 4.6.24 or OCP 4.7.7 cluster 2. deploy OCS 4.6 or 4.7 on top of it 3. create pods (e.g. like shown here https://red-hat-storage.github.io/ocs-training/training/ocs4/ocs.html#_create_a_new_ocp_application_deployment_using_cephfs_volume ) 4. especially set volume with `oc set volume deploy/file-uploader --add --name=my-shared-storage \ -t pvc --claim-mode=ReadWriteMany --claim-size=1Gi \ --claim-name=my-shared-storage --claim-class=ocs-storagecluster-cephfs \ --mount-path=/opt/app-root/src/uploaded \ -n my-shared-storage` 5. Try to get snapshot via ui --> Snapshot Class is empty and cannot be chosen Actual results: it is not possible to create a snapshot from a volume created with oc set volume deploy/file-uploader --add --name=my-shared-storage \ -t pvc --claim-mode=ReadWriteMany --claim-size=1Gi \ --claim-name=my-shared-storage --claim-class=ocs-storagecluster-cephfs \ --mount-path=/opt/app-root/src/uploaded \ -n my-shared-storage looking at the created pvc with oc edit, I see ~~~ # Please edit the object below. Lines beginning with a '#' will be ignored, # and an empty file will abort the edit. If an error occurs while saving this file will be # reopened with the relevant failures. # apiVersion: v1 kind: PersistentVolumeClaim metadata: annotations: pv.kubernetes.io/bind-completed: "yes" pv.kubernetes.io/bound-by-controller: "yes" volume.beta.kubernetes.io/storage-class: ocs-storagecluster-cephfs volume.beta.kubernetes.io/storage-provisioner: openshift-storage.cephfs.csi.ceph.com creationTimestamp: "2021-04-27T14:01:00Z" finalizers: - kubernetes.io/pvc-protection name: my-shared-storage namespace: my-shared-storage resourceVersion: "49103" selfLink: /api/v1/namespaces/my-shared-storage/persistentvolumeclaims/my-shared-storage uid: a4a7a5b7-38f3-4009-8a40-9bbfd4a5ec19 spec: accessModes: - ReadWriteMany resources: requests: storage: 1Gi volumeMode: Filesystem volumeName: pvc-a4a7a5b7-38f3-4009-8a40-9bbfd4a5ec19 status: accessModes: - ReadWriteMany capacity: storage: 1Gi phase: Bound ~~~ so no storageClassName added Expected results: storageClassName added to the created pvc as specified by oc volume set ... --claim-class=<...> Additional info: If I do edit the created pvc and add the storageClassName to it: ~~~ # Please edit the object below. Lines beginning with a '#' will be ignored, # and an empty file will abort the edit. If an error occurs while saving this file will be # reopened with the relevant failures. # apiVersion: v1 kind: PersistentVolumeClaim metadata: annotations: pv.kubernetes.io/bind-completed: "yes" pv.kubernetes.io/bound-by-controller: "yes" volume.beta.kubernetes.io/storage-class: ocs-storagecluster-cephfs volume.beta.kubernetes.io/storage-provisioner: openshift-storage.cephfs.csi.ceph.com creationTimestamp: "2021-04-27T15:01:00Z" finalizers: - kubernetes.io/pvc-protection name: my-shared-storage namespace: my-shared-storage resourceVersion: "49312" selfLink: /api/v1/namespaces/my-shared-storage/persistentvolumeclaims/my-shared-storage uid: a4a7a5b7-38f3-4009-8a40-9bbfd4a5ec19 spec: accessModes: - ReadWriteMany resources: requests: storage: 1Gi storageClassName: ocs-storagecluster-cephfs <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<< volumeMode: Filesystem volumeName: pvc-a4a7a5b7-38f3-4009-8a40-9bbfd4a5ec19 status: accessModes: - ReadWriteMany capacity: storage: 1Gi phase: Bound ~~~ I see in the UI a Snapshot Class prefilled and can create a snapshot
This bug hasn't had any activity in the last 30 days. Maybe the problem got resolved, was a duplicate of something else, or became less pressing for some reason - or maybe it's still relevant but just hasn't been looked at yet. As such, we're marking this bug as "LifecycleStale" and decreasing the severity/priority. If you have further information on the current state of the bug, please update it, otherwise this bug can be closed in about 7 days. The information can be, for example, that the problem still occurs, that you still want the feature, that more information is needed, or that the bug is (for whatever reason) no longer relevant. Additionally, you can add LifecycleFrozen into Keywords if you think this bug should never be marked as stale. Please consult with bug assignee before you do that.
Checked with latest oc , can't reproduce the issue now: [root@localhost roottest]# oc version --client Client Version: 4.8.0-202106130124.p0.git.1077b05.assembly.stream-1077b05 Now we can see the storageClassName added . # Please edit the object below. Lines beginning with a '#' will be ignored, # and an empty file will abort the edit. If an error occurs while saving this file will be # reopened with the relevant failures. # apiVersion: v1 kind: PersistentVolumeClaim metadata: annotations: pv.kubernetes.io/bind-completed: "yes" pv.kubernetes.io/bound-by-controller: "yes" volume.beta.kubernetes.io/storage-provisioner: openshift-storage.cephfs.csi.ceph.com creationTimestamp: "2021-06-17T06:21:20Z" finalizers: - kubernetes.io/pvc-protection name: my-shared-storage namespace: my-shared-storage resourceVersion: "83896" uid: 360b7b64-4f06-4a40-b0e8-d73d4af607cf spec: accessModes: - ReadWriteMany resources: requests: storage: 1Gi storageClassName: ocs-storagecluster-cephfs volumeMode: Filesystem volumeName: pvc-360b7b64-4f06-4a40-b0e8-d73d4af607cf status: accessModes: - ReadWriteMany capacity: storage: 1Gi phase: Bound
Hi Paul, this looks fine. Thanks
Since the problem described in this bug report should be resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For information on the advisory (Moderate: OpenShift Container Platform 4.8.2 bug fix and security update), and where to find the updated files, follow the link below. If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report. https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2021:2438