Bug 1955834 - [GSS][RFE] Need ability to adjust healthCheck timeout(s)
Summary: [GSS][RFE] Need ability to adjust healthCheck timeout(s)
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED WONTFIX
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat OpenShift Data Foundation
Classification: Red Hat Storage
Component: ocs-operator
Version: 4.6
Hardware: All
OS: All
unspecified
high
Target Milestone: ---
: ---
Assignee: umanga
QA Contact: Elad
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2021-04-30 23:01 UTC by Randy Martinez
Modified: 2023-12-08 04:25 UTC (History)
10 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2022-05-27 13:56:11 UTC
Embargoed:

Attachments (Terms of Use)


Links
System ID Private Priority Status Summary Last Updated
Github rook rook issues 7776 0 None open Mon failover should not be triggered during a node drain until a longer timeout 2021-04-30 23:02:07 UTC

Internal Links: 1984240

Comment 3 Travis Nielsen 2021-05-03 15:08:04 UTC 
The health checks are currently configurable in Rook as described here: https://rook.github.io/docs/rook/v1.6/ceph-cluster-crd.html#health-settings

These settings not allowed in OCS due to the reconcile of the full CephCluster. 
Either OCS operator needs to be changed to allow settings like this to not be reconciled, or else this needs to be exposed from the StorageCluster. This seems like a good time for the former.
Comment 6 umanga 2021-06-01 08:42:15 UTC 
Since it's an RFE, moving it to 4.9. We'll discuss on the resolution.
Comment 8 Jose A. Rivera 2021-09-29 16:18:09 UTC 
Still no discussion on this, so moving further to ODF 4.10. For my part, we now do have the ability to not reconcile the full CephCluster. This of course comes with the caveat that the CephCluster will no longer receive updates from ocs-operator in future releases. If we want this to persist during reconciliation, we need to expose it in the StorageCluster API. @r.martinez is this something you'd like to see added?

In any case, @etamir should decide if he wants to take this in for release planning. If so we'll need an Epic for this.
Comment 10 Red Hat Bugzilla 2023-12-08 04:25:25 UTC 
The needinfo request[s] on this closed bug have been removed as they have been unresolved for 120 days
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.