Bug 1956261 - [RFE] Avoid the possibilty of mistakenously trigger the same capsule sync more than once in parallel
Summary: [RFE] Avoid the possibilty of mistakenously trigger the same capsule sync mor...
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED DUPLICATE of bug 1581415
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat Satellite
Classification: Red Hat
Component: Capsule - Content
Version: 6.8.0
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
unspecified
medium
Target Milestone: Unspecified
Assignee: satellite6-bugs
QA Contact: Vladimír Sedmík
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2021-05-03 10:33 UTC by Francesco Ratto
Modified: 2022-08-30 03:35 UTC (History)
5 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2022-08-30 03:30:45 UTC
Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Francesco Ratto 2021-05-03 10:33:29 UTC
Description of problem:During normal use of capsule server it is possible to mistakenly trigger more than a single sync in parallel on the same capsule server.This is causing slowness and disruption to the satellite and capsule server 


Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):


How reproducible: always 


Steps to Reproduce:
1.start 2 capsule sync on the same capsule server 
2.
3.

Actual results:the two (or more syncs) overlap causing slowness and ultimately disruption 


Expected results: It should not be possible to trigger two or more syncs on the same server in parallel . Is it clear this is an operational mistake but a lock could easily avoid such a mistake 


Additional info:

Comment 1 Daniel Alley 2022-08-30 03:30:45 UTC
If they actually _overlap_ then this is definitely a bug in the Pulp 2 tasking system (as opposed to an RFE - this already shouldn't happen).  However being Pulp 2 I wouldn't be surprised.

We've torture tested the Pulp 3 tasking system to a much greater extent and it has been vastly more reliable overall. I think we can safely close this without more recent reports of issues.

Comment 2 Daniel Alley 2022-08-30 03:32:23 UTC
Also there is more discussion on https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1581415 which seems to be very similar

Comment 3 Daniel Alley 2022-08-30 03:35:18 UTC

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 1581415 ***


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.