Note: This bug is displayed in read-only format because the product is no longer active in Red Hat Bugzilla.

RHEL Engineering is moving the tracking of its product development work on RHEL 6 through RHEL 9 to Red Hat Jira (issues.redhat.com). If you're a Red Hat customer, please continue to file support cases via the Red Hat customer portal. If you're not, please head to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira and file new tickets here. Individual Bugzilla bugs in the statuses "NEW", "ASSIGNED", and "POST" are being migrated throughout September 2023. Bugs of Red Hat partners with an assigned Engineering Partner Manager (EPM) are migrated in late September as per pre-agreed dates. Bugs against components "kernel", "kernel-rt", and "kpatch" are only migrated if still in "NEW" or "ASSIGNED". If you cannot log in to RH Jira, please consult article #7032570. That failing, please send an e-mail to the RH Jira admins at rh-issues@redhat.com to troubleshoot your issue as a user management inquiry. The email creates a ServiceNow ticket with Red Hat. Individual Bugzilla bugs that are migrated will be moved to status "CLOSED", resolution "MIGRATED", and set with "MigratedToJIRA" in "Keywords". The link to the successor Jira issue will be found under "Links", have a little "two-footprint" icon next to it, and direct you to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira (issue links are of type "https://issues.redhat.com/browse/RHEL-XXXX", where "X" is a digit). This same link will be available in a blue banner at the top of the page informing you that that bug has been migrated.

+++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #1781796 +++

--- Additional comment from Andreas Bleischwitz on 2020-07-24 08:47:04 CEST ---

Hi,

the request was raised as my user was installing a system manually via anaconda, applied a OSCAP profile which required some filesystems to be separated. As he did just a standard partitioning, those were flagged as missing. Due to the fact that the information-box showing this message was quite tiny for such messages, he struggled to identify and manually add the missing partitions/mount-points. Additionally some missing mount-options had been reported, but those should be added automatically.

From a user perspective it would be great if the filesystems (or mount-points) which should get separated would show up in the drop-down list within the partitioning page. That way a user would easily be able to identify which filesystems will have to get created.

Copying the question from bug 1781796:

To tailor the dropdown menu (or maybe even add constrains to Anaconda partitioning checker) based on the policy selected by OSCAP we would have to provide the OSCAP addon an API to be possible to tell us mount point what have to be present or are recommended. Then they should be able to just fill the requirements there.

The question is, if they are possible to tell us what is requested. I'm not familiar of how OSCAP works on this field and these data may not be propagated to the Anaconda OSCAP addon. Could OSCAP developers please confirm that they are able to use API such that from the Anaconda when it's present and if such a solution would be feasible for you?

Sorry for taking so long - the answer is that we could make use of such API - we are able to specify that we require separate partition for a mount point with a certain set of mount options.

After evaluating this issue, there are no plans to address it further or fix it in an upcoming release.  Therefore, it is being closed.  If plans change such that this issue will be fixed in an upcoming release, then the bug can be reopened.