Bug 1967330 - Make qemu-kvm use versioned obsoletes for qemu-kvm-ma and qemu-kvm-rhev
Summary: Make qemu-kvm use versioned obsoletes for qemu-kvm-ma and qemu-kvm-rhev
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux Advanced Virtualization
Classification: Red Hat
Component: qemu-kvm
Version: 8.4
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
unspecified
unspecified
Target Milestone: rc
: 8.5
Assignee: Danilo de Paula
QA Contact: jingzhao
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2021-06-02 21:57 UTC by Danilo de Paula
Modified: 2021-11-16 08:40 UTC (History)
7 users (show)

Fixed In Version: qemu-kvm-6.0.0-22.module+el8.5.0+11695+95588379
Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2021-11-16 07:53:43 UTC
Type: Bug
Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)


Links
System ID Private Priority Status Summary Last Updated
Red Hat Product Errata RHBA-2021:4684 0 None None None 2021-11-16 07:54:43 UTC

Description Danilo de Paula 2021-06-02 21:57:01 UTC
This bug was initially created as a copy of Bug #1967329

I am copying this bug because: 



Right now qemu-kvm defines the following in the spec file:

Obsoletes: qemu-kvm-ma
Obsoletes: qemu-kvm-rhev

However it generates a warning saying that using unversioned obsoletes is not recommended.


Those needs to be replaced by:

Obsoletes: qemu-kvm-ma <= {%epoch}:%{version}-{release}
Obsoletes: qemu-kvm-rhev <= {%epoch}:%{version}-{release}

This is a low hanging fruit that needs to be fixed eventually.
I created this BZ so we don't forget.

Comment 1 John Ferlan 2021-06-14 12:49:51 UTC
Assigned to Jeff for initial triage per bz process and age of bug created or assigned to virt-maint without triage.

Comment 2 Jeff Nelson 2021-06-15 22:40:17 UTC
Assigned to Danilo for delegation to a maintainer.

Comment 3 Danilo de Paula 2021-06-29 16:59:32 UTC
QA-ACK, please?

Comment 8 Yanan Fu 2021-07-08 15:59:01 UTC
QE bot(pre verify): Set 'Verified:Tested,SanityOnly' as gating/tier1 test pass.

Comment 10 Danilo de Paula 2021-07-15 13:32:21 UTC
That's odd to test, right?

Honestly I don't think it can be verified outside of the build process. So checking the spec file for that information sounds enough.
In that case, yes, that's expected.

Comment 13 errata-xmlrpc 2021-11-16 07:53:43 UTC
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory (virt:av bug fix and enhancement update), and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2021:4684


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.