RHEL Engineering is moving the tracking of its product development work on RHEL 6 through RHEL 9 to Red Hat Jira (issues.redhat.com). If you're a Red Hat customer, please continue to file support cases via the Red Hat customer portal. If you're not, please head to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira and file new tickets here. Individual Bugzilla bugs in the statuses "NEW", "ASSIGNED", and "POST" are being migrated throughout September 2023. Bugs of Red Hat partners with an assigned Engineering Partner Manager (EPM) are migrated in late September as per pre-agreed dates. Bugs against components "kernel", "kernel-rt", and "kpatch" are only migrated if still in "NEW" or "ASSIGNED". If you cannot log in to RH Jira, please consult article #7032570. That failing, please send an e-mail to the RH Jira admins at rh-issues@redhat.com to troubleshoot your issue as a user management inquiry. The email creates a ServiceNow ticket with Red Hat. Individual Bugzilla bugs that are migrated will be moved to status "CLOSED", resolution "MIGRATED", and set with "MigratedToJIRA" in "Keywords". The link to the successor Jira issue will be found under "Links", have a little "two-footprint" icon next to it, and direct you to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira (issue links are of type "https://issues.redhat.com/browse/RHEL-XXXX", where "X" is a digit). This same link will be available in a blue banner at the top of the page informing you that that bug has been migrated.
Bug 1967565 - annocheck failures on bind-libs, aarch64 platform
Summary: annocheck failures on bind-libs, aarch64 platform
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED WONTFIX
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9
Classification: Red Hat
Component: bind
Version: CentOS Stream
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
unspecified
unspecified
Target Milestone: beta
: ---
Assignee: Petr Menšík
QA Contact: rhel-cs-infra-services-qe
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On: 1961686 1984652
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2021-06-03 11:38 UTC by Petr Menšík
Modified: 2022-12-03 07:27 UTC (History)
3 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2022-12-03 07:27:39 UTC
Type: Bug
Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Attachments (Terms of Use)
all failures list (68.49 KB, text/plain)
2021-06-03 13:13 UTC, Petr Menšík 		no flags Details
View All


Links
System ID Private Priority Status Summary Last Updated
Red Hat Issue Tracker OSCI-2401 0 None None None 2021-08-25 12:49:26 UTC

Description Petr Menšík 2021-06-03 11:38:14 UTC 
Description of problem:
After prepared rebase, annocheck failures discovered errors I think in every bind library. bind tried to do some special magic for printing out backtraces when it crashes.

I think all those symbols are errors

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
bind-9.16.15-1.el9

How reproducible:
reliable

Steps to Reproduce:
1. extract bind-libs rpm
2. annocheck --verbose usr/lib*/lib*.so.*
3.

Actual results:
Hardened: /usr/lib64/libdns-9.16.15-RH.so: FAIL: stack-clash test because -fstack-clash-protection not enabled (function: dns_acl_isany) 
Hardened: /usr/lib64/libdns-9.16.15-RH.so: FAIL: stack-clash test because -fstack-clash-protection not enabled (function: dns_adb_setadbsize) 
Hardened: /usr/lib64/libdns-9.16.15-RH.so: FAIL: stack-clash test because -fstack-clash-protection not enabled (function: dns_catz_get_iterator) 
Hardened: /usr/lib64/libdns-9.16.15-RH.so: FAIL: stack-clash test because -fstack-clash-protection not enabled (function: dns_dispatch_getsocket) 
Hardened: /usr/lib64/libdns-9.16.15-RH.so: FAIL: stack-clash test because -fstack-clash-protection not enabled (function: dns_journal_empty) 
Hardened: /usr/lib64/libdns-9.16.15-RH.so: FAIL: stack-clash test because -fstack-clash-protection not enabled (function: dns_keynode_dsset) 
Hardened: /usr/lib64/libdns-9.16.15-RH.so: FAIL: stack-clash test because -fstack-clash-protection not enabled (function: dns_loadctx_cancel) 
Hardened: /usr/lib64/libdns-9.16.15-RH.so: FAIL: stack-clash test because -fstack-clash-protection not enabled (function: dns_message_gettsig) 
Hardened: /usr/lib64/libdns-9.16.15-RH.so: FAIL: stack-clash test because -fstack-clash-protection not enabled (function: dns_message_pseudosectiontotext) 
Hardened: /usr/lib64/libdns-9.16.15-RH.so: FAIL: stack-clash test because -fstack-clash-protection not enabled (function: dns_message_getrawmessage) 
Hardened: /usr/lib64/libdns-9.16.15-RH.so: FAIL: stack-clash test because -fstack-clash-protection not enabled (function: dns_nsec_setbit) 
Hardened: /usr/lib64/libdns-9.16.15-RH.so: FAIL: stack-clash test because -fstack-clash-protection not enabled (function: dns__rbtnode_getdistance) 
Hardened: /usr/lib64/libdns-9.16.15-RH.so: FAIL: stack-clash test because -fstack-clash-protection not enabled (addr range: 0xaa170..0xb3678) 
Hardened: /usr/lib64/libdns-9.16.15-RH.so: FAIL: stack-clash test because -fstack-clash-protection not enabled (function: dns_rcode_fromtext) 
Hardened: /usr/lib64/libdns-9.16.15-RH.so: FAIL: stack-clash test because -fstack-clash-protection not enabled (function: dns_rdata_txt_first) 
Hardened: /usr/lib64/libdns-9.16.15-RH.so: FAIL: stack-clash test because -fstack-clash-protection not enabled (function: dns_rdata_apl_current) 
Hardened: /usr/lib64/libdns-9.16.15-RH.so: FAIL: stack-clash test because -fstack-clash-protection not enabled (function: dns_rdata_fromregion) 
Hardened: /usr/lib64/libdns-9.16.15-RH.so: FAIL: stack-clash test because -fstack-clash-protection not enabled (function: dns_rdata_towire) 
Hardened: /usr/lib64/libdns-9.16.15-RH.so: FAIL: stack-clash test because -fstack-clash-protection not enabled (function: dns_rdata_fromstruct) 
Hardened: /usr/lib64/libdns-9.16.15-RH.so: FAIL: stack-clash test because -fstack-clash-protection not enabled (function: dns_rdatatype_attributes) 
Hardened: /usr/lib64/libdns-9.16.15-RH.so: FAIL: stack-clash test because -fstack-clash-protection not enabled (function: isc__rdatalist_disassociate) 
Hardened: /usr/lib64/libdns-9.16.15-RH.so: FAIL: stack-clash test because -fstack-clash-protection not enabled (addr range: 0xf2210..0xfba58) 
Hardened: /usr/lib64/libdns-9.16.15-RH.so: FAIL: stack-clash test because -fstack-clash-protection not enabled (function: dns_resolver_freeze) 
Hardened: /usr/lib64/libdns-9.16.15-RH.so: FAIL: stack-clash test because -fstack-clash-protection not enabled (function: dns_rpz_type2str) 
Hardened: /usr/lib64/libdns-9.16.15-RH.so: FAIL: stack-clash test because -fstack-clash-protection not enabled (function: dns_soa_getserial) 
Hardened: /usr/lib64/libdns-9.16.15-RH.so: FAIL: stack-clash test because -fstack-clash-protection not enabled (function: dns_tsec_gettype) 
Hardened: /usr/lib64/libdns-9.16.15-RH.so: FAIL: stack-clash test because -fstack-clash-protection not enabled (function: dns_validator_send) 
Hardened: /usr/lib64/libdns-9.16.15-RH.so: FAIL: stack-clash test because -fstack-clash-protection not enabled (function: dns_view_setnewzonedir) 
Hardened: /usr/lib64/libdns-9.16.15-RH.so: FAIL: stack-clash test because -fstack-clash-protection not enabled (function: dns_zone_attach) 
Hardened: /usr/lib64/libdns-9.16.15-RH.so: FAIL: stack-clash test because -fstack-clash-protection not enabled (function: dns_zone_setminrefreshtime) 
Hardened: /usr/lib64/libdns-9.16.15-RH.so: FAIL: stack-clash test because -fstack-clash-protection not enabled (function: dns_zone_getnotifyacl) 
Hardened: /usr/lib64/libdns-9.16.15-RH.so: FAIL: stack-clash test because -fstack-clash-protection not enabled (function: dns_zone_getorigin) 
Hardened: /usr/lib64/libdns-9.16.15-RH.so: FAIL: stack-clash test because -fstack-clash-protection not enabled (function: dns_zone_rekey) 
Hardened: /usr/lib64/libdns-9.16.15-RH.so: FAIL: stack-clash test because -fstack-clash-protection not enabled (function: dst_algorithm_supported) 
Hardened: /usr/lib64/libdns-9.16.15-RH.so: FAIL: stack-clash test because -fstack-clash-protection not enabled (function: dst__openssl_toresult) 
Hardened: /usr/lib64/libdns-9.16.15-RH.so: FAIL: stack-clash test because -fstack-clash-protection not enabled (function: dns_client_mctx) 
Hardened: /usr/lib64/libdns-9.16.15-RH.so: FAIL: stack-clash test because -fstack-clash-protection not enabled (addr range: 0x18c420..0x1969b8) 

Expected results:
only PASS: or skip: should be reported.

Additional info:

Could not yet find any pattern, how were failing symbols selected. They seem to be reliably same. I think they are false positive, but haven't found any way to prove it (yet).
Comment 2 Petr Menšík 2021-06-03 13:13:35 UTC 
Created attachment 1788842 [details]
all failures list

all failures in bind 9.16.15
Comment 4 Petr Menšík 2021-06-24 19:11:27 UTC 
It might be indeed problem of using libtool, which is used to build bind. It might be fixed by libtool fixed and then just rebuild to scan resulting build.
Comment 7 Petr Menšík 2021-08-25 11:02:31 UTC 
Last build still does not pass annocheck, but there is much less failures.

For every shared library it reports on aarch64:
branch-protection test because The -mbranch-protection option was not used

1) annocheck 'rhel-policy' test fails for /usr/lib64/libbind9-9.16.20-RH.so on aarch64

Result: VERIFY
Waiver Authorization: Not Waivable

Details:
annocheck: Version 9.90.
Hardened: /usr/lib64/libbind9-9.16.20-RH.so: PASS: pie test 
Hardened: /usr/lib64/libbind9-9.16.20-RH.so: WARN: DW_FORM_GNU_strp_alt not yet handled
Hardened: /usr/lib64/libbind9-9.16.20-RH.so: PASS: writeable-got test 
Hardened: /usr/lib64/libbind9-9.16.20-RH.so: PASS: dynamic-segment test 
Hardened: /usr/lib64/libbind9-9.16.20-RH.so: PASS: bind-now test 
Hardened: /usr/lib64/libbind9-9.16.20-RH.so: info: set binary producer to Gas version 2.
Hardened: /usr/lib64/libbind9-9.16.20-RH.so: info: notes produced by assembler plugin version 1
Hardened: /usr/lib64/libbind9-9.16.20-RH.so: info: set binary producer to Gimple version 9.
Hardened: /usr/lib64/libbind9-9.16.20-RH.so: info: notes produced by lto plugin version 9.90
Hardened: /usr/lib64/libbind9-9.16.20-RH.so: PASS: stack-prot test 
Hardened: /usr/lib64/libbind9-9.16.20-RH.so: PASS: pic test 
Hardened: /usr/lib64/libbind9-9.16.20-RH.so: skip: fortify test because LTO compilation discards preprocessor options 
Hardened: /usr/lib64/libbind9-9.16.20-RH.so: skip: glibcxx-assertions test because source language not C++ 
Hardened: /usr/lib64/libbind9-9.16.20-RH.so: PASS: optimization test 
Hardened: /usr/lib64/libbind9-9.16.20-RH.so: skip: warnings test because LTO compilation discards preprocessor options 
Hardened: /usr/lib64/libbind9-9.16.20-RH.so: PASS: lto test because LTO compilation detected 
Hardened: /usr/lib64/libbind9-9.16.20-RH.so: PASS: stack-clash test 
Hardened: /usr/lib64/libbind9-9.16.20-RH.so: PASS: gnu-stack test because stack segment exists with the correct permissions 
Hardened: /usr/lib64/libbind9-9.16.20-RH.so: PASS: gnu-relro test 
Hardened: /usr/lib64/libbind9-9.16.20-RH.so: PASS: notes test because no gaps found 
Hardened: /usr/lib64/libbind9-9.16.20-RH.so: FAIL: branch-protection test because The -mbranch-protection option was not used 
Hardened: /usr/lib64/libbind9-9.16.20-RH.so: skip: cf-protection test because not an x86 executable 
Hardened: /usr/lib64/libbind9-9.16.20-RH.so: PASS: entry test 
Hardened: /usr/lib64/libbind9-9.16.20-RH.so: skip: go-revision test because no GO compiled code found 
Hardened: /usr/lib64/libbind9-9.16.20-RH.so: skip: only-go test because not compiled for x86 
Hardened: /usr/lib64/libbind9-9.16.20-RH.so: PASS: production test 
Hardened: /usr/lib64/libbind9-9.16.20-RH.so: PASS: run-path test 
Hardened: /usr/lib64/libbind9-9.16.20-RH.so: PASS: rwx-seg test 
Hardened: /usr/lib64/libbind9-9.16.20-RH.so: PASS: short-enum test 
Hardened: /usr/lib64/libbind9-9.16.20-RH.so: skip: stack-realign test because not an x86 executable 
Hardened: /usr/lib64/libbind9-9.16.20-RH.so: PASS: textrel test 
Hardened: /usr/lib64/libbind9-9.16.20-RH.so: PASS: threads test 

Suggested Remedy:
See annocheck(1) for more information.

...

4) annocheck 'rhel-policy' test fails for /usr/lib64/libisc-9.16.20-RH.so on aarch64

Result: VERIFY
Waiver Authorization: Not Waivable

Details:
annocheck: Version 9.90.
Hardened: /usr/lib64/libisc-9.16.20-RH.so: PASS: pie test 
Hardened: /usr/lib64/libisc-9.16.20-RH.so: WARN: DW_FORM_GNU_strp_alt not yet handled
Hardened: /usr/lib64/libisc-9.16.20-RH.so: PASS: writeable-got test 
Hardened: /usr/lib64/libisc-9.16.20-RH.so: PASS: dynamic-segment test 
Hardened: /usr/lib64/libisc-9.16.20-RH.so: PASS: bind-now test 
Hardened: /usr/lib64/libisc-9.16.20-RH.so: info: set binary producer to Gas version 2.
Hardened: /usr/lib64/libisc-9.16.20-RH.so: info: notes produced by assembler plugin version 1
Hardened: /usr/lib64/libisc-9.16.20-RH.so: info: set binary producer to Gimple version 9.
Hardened: /usr/lib64/libisc-9.16.20-RH.so: info: notes produced by lto plugin version 9.90
Hardened: /usr/lib64/libisc-9.16.20-RH.so: PASS: stack-prot test 
Hardened: /usr/lib64/libisc-9.16.20-RH.so: PASS: pic test 
Hardened: /usr/lib64/libisc-9.16.20-RH.so: skip: fortify test because LTO compilation discards preprocessor options 
Hardened: /usr/lib64/libisc-9.16.20-RH.so: skip: glibcxx-assertions test because source language not C++ 
Hardened: /usr/lib64/libisc-9.16.20-RH.so: PASS: optimization test 
Hardened: /usr/lib64/libisc-9.16.20-RH.so: skip: warnings test because LTO compilation discards preprocessor options 
Hardened: /usr/lib64/libisc-9.16.20-RH.so: PASS: lto test because LTO compilation detected 
Hardened: /usr/lib64/libisc-9.16.20-RH.so: PASS: stack-clash test 
Hardened: /usr/lib64/libisc-9.16.20-RH.so: FAIL: branch-protection test because not enabled (function: isc__shutdown) 
Hardened: /usr/lib64/libisc-9.16.20-RH.so: PASS: gnu-stack test because stack segment exists with the correct permissions 
Hardened: /usr/lib64/libisc-9.16.20-RH.so: PASS: gnu-relro test 
Hardened: /usr/lib64/libisc-9.16.20-RH.so: PASS: notes test because no gaps found 
Hardened: /usr/lib64/libisc-9.16.20-RH.so: skip: cf-protection test because not an x86 executable 
Hardened: /usr/lib64/libisc-9.16.20-RH.so: PASS: entry test 
Hardened: /usr/lib64/libisc-9.16.20-RH.so: skip: go-revision test because no GO compiled code found 
Hardened: /usr/lib64/libisc-9.16.20-RH.so: skip: only-go test because not compiled for x86 
Hardened: /usr/lib64/libisc-9.16.20-RH.so: PASS: production test 
Hardened: /usr/lib64/libisc-9.16.20-RH.so: PASS: run-path test 
Hardened: /usr/lib64/libisc-9.16.20-RH.so: PASS: rwx-seg test 
Hardened: /usr/lib64/libisc-9.16.20-RH.so: PASS: short-enum test 
Hardened: /usr/lib64/libisc-9.16.20-RH.so: skip: stack-realign test because not an x86 executable 
Hardened: /usr/lib64/libisc-9.16.20-RH.so: PASS: textrel test 
Hardened: /usr/lib64/libisc-9.16.20-RH.so: PASS: threads test 

Suggested Remedy:
See annocheck(1) for more information.
Comment 9 Petr Menšík 2021-08-25 11:44:18 UTC 
I am sure BIND is passing flags as good as it is able to. But still some annobin checks fail. This change seems to be introduced outside of my package and would be probably solved somewhere else too. Would keep the bug open until it can pass gating tests without waiving, but I doubt I can improve anything on my side.
Comment 13 RHEL Program Management 2022-12-03 07:27:39 UTC 
After evaluating this issue, there are no plans to address it further or fix it in an upcoming release.  Therefore, it is being closed.  If plans change such that this issue will be fixed in an upcoming release, then the bug can be reopened.
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.