Note: This bug is displayed in read-only format because the product is no longer active in Red Hat Bugzilla.

Bug 1968228

Summary: NetApp driver cannot configure thick provisioning with AFF platforms
Product: Red Hat OpenStack Reporter: Young Kim <youngkim>
Component: openstack-manilaAssignee: Goutham Pacha Ravi <gouthamr>
Status: CLOSED ERRATA QA Contact:
Severity: high Docs Contact: Erin Peterson <erpeters>
Priority: high    
Version: 16.1 (Train)CC: gouthamr, jelynch, vimartin
Target Milestone: z9Keywords: OtherQA, Triaged
Target Release: 16.1 (Train on RHEL 8.2)   
Hardware: Unspecified   
OS: Unspecified   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: openstack-manila-9.1.5-1.20220411174044.d9e6743 Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Before this update, the API that the Shared File Systems service (manila) uses to provision storage on NetApp ONTAP All Flash Fabric-Attached (AFF) storage systems caused Shared File Systems service shares to be thinly provisioned. The API did not enforce space guarantees, even when requested through the Shared File Systems service share type. With this update, the driver sets appropriate parameters for the NetApp ONTAP 9 API to work with AFF storage as well as traditional FAS storage systems. The API enforces space guarantees on NetApp ONTAP storage through the Shared File Systems service share types.
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2022-12-07 20:24:45 UTC Type: Bug
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Comment 16 errata-xmlrpc 2022-12-07 20:24:45 UTC
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory (Red Hat OpenStack Platform 16.1.9 bug fix and enhancement advisory), and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2022:8795