Bug 1968583 - [Doc] Known issue present in 2.6 needs updated workaround for 4.8
Summary: [Doc] Known issue present in 2.6 needs updated workaround for 4.8
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE
Alias: None
Product: Container Native Virtualization (CNV)
Classification: Red Hat
Component: Documentation
Version: 4.8.0
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
unspecified
high
Target Milestone: ---
: 4.8.0
Assignee: Pan Ousley
QA Contact: Israel Pinto
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2021-06-07 15:40 UTC by Pan Ousley
Modified: 2021-07-28 14:11 UTC (History)
3 users (show)

Fixed In Version: 4.8
Doc Type: Known Issue
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2021-07-28 14:11:04 UTC
Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)


Links
System ID Private Priority Status Summary Last Updated
Github openshift openshift-docs pull 33981 0 None open BZ#1968583: Updating known issue workaround for 4.8 2021-06-25 16:24:10 UTC
Red Hat Bugzilla 1760028 1 high CLOSED CPU compatibility is not checked when migrating host-model VMs 2024-12-20 18:54:45 UTC

Description Pan Ousley 2021-06-07 15:40:30 UTC
Document URL: https://docs.openshift.com/container-platform/4.7/virt/virt-2-6-release-notes.html#virt-2-6-known-issues 

(change is needed in the 4.8 release notes, though -- not the 2.6 release notes)

Describe the issue: The known issue associated with the linked BZ (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1760028) has a workaround in 2.6 that is no longer functional in 4.8 due to the removal of a config map.

Suggestions for improvement: Replace the existing workaround with the following jsonpatch:

```
oc annotate --overwrite -n openshift-cnv hyperconverged kubevirt-hyperconverged kubevirt.kubevirt.io/jsonpatch='[{
     "op": "add",
      "path": "/spec/configuration/cpuModel",
      "value": "<string>"
  }]'
```

Additional information: This change was requested as part of CNV-10277, but I am splitting it off into this bug so that CNV-10277 can move forward separately.

Comment 1 Ruth Netser 2021-06-23 09:13:04 UTC
@pousley LGTM

Comment 2 Pan Ousley 2021-06-25 16:23:46 UTC
Hi Israel, can you please review this PR from the QE perspective? I am not sure that I have the spacing right.

PR: https://github.com/openshift/openshift-docs/pull/33981
Preview link is in the description.

Thanks!

Comment 5 Pan Ousley 2021-07-19 17:07:54 UTC
Thanks, Israel! I have now merged the PR.


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.