RHEL Engineering is moving the tracking of its product development work on RHEL 6 through RHEL 9 to Red Hat Jira (issues.redhat.com). If you're a Red Hat customer, please continue to file support cases via the Red Hat customer portal. If you're not, please head to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira and file new tickets here. Individual Bugzilla bugs in the statuses "NEW", "ASSIGNED", and "POST" are being migrated throughout September 2023. Bugs of Red Hat partners with an assigned Engineering Partner Manager (EPM) are migrated in late September as per pre-agreed dates. Bugs against components "kernel", "kernel-rt", and "kpatch" are only migrated if still in "NEW" or "ASSIGNED". If you cannot log in to RH Jira, please consult article #7032570. That failing, please send an e-mail to the RH Jira admins at rh-issues@redhat.com to troubleshoot your issue as a user management inquiry. The email creates a ServiceNow ticket with Red Hat. Individual Bugzilla bugs that are migrated will be moved to status "CLOSED", resolution "MIGRATED", and set with "MigratedToJIRA" in "Keywords". The link to the successor Jira issue will be found under "Links", have a little "two-footprint" icon next to it, and direct you to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira (issue links are of type "https://issues.redhat.com/browse/RHEL-XXXX", where "X" is a digit). This same link will be available in a blue banner at the top of the page informing you that that bug has been migrated.
Bug 1969787 - Memory leak in RPC server could allocate a lot of memory for print servers
Summary: Memory leak in RPC server could allocate a lot of memory for print servers
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8
Classification: Red Hat
Component: samba
Version: 8.5
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
unspecified
high
Target Milestone: beta
: ---
Assignee: Andreas Schneider
QA Contact: Denis Karpelevich
URL:
Whiteboard:
: 1971714 (view as bug list)
Depends On:
Blocks: 1969831
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2021-06-09 09:14 UTC by Andreas Schneider
Modified: 2021-11-10 09:14 UTC (History)
11 users (show)

Fixed In Version: samba-4.14.5-0.el8
Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
: 1969831 (view as bug list)
Environment:
Last Closed: 2021-11-09 19:48:02 UTC
Type: Bug
Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)


Links
System ID Private Priority Status Summary Last Updated
Red Hat Product Errata RHBA-2021:4438 0 None None None 2021-11-09 19:48:08 UTC
Samba Project 14675 0 None None None 2021-06-09 09:14:42 UTC

Description Andreas Schneider 2021-06-09 09:14:42 UTC
Description of problem:
Memory leak in RPC server could allocate a lot of memory for print servers

On a heavily loaded Samba printserver with several hundred queque it was noted that after upgrading from 4.6 to 4.13 smbd processes were eating up memory over the cause of a few days.

As an example the smbd process with the highest resided set size was

  PID USER      PR  NI    VIRT    RES    SHR S  %CPU %MEM     TIME+ COMMAND
 7657 WIN\pet+  20   0 1369160 398484   7824 S   0,0  2,5   1:02.80 smbd

398 MB...

talloc report of the process:

  full talloc report on 'null_context' (total 153473847 bytes in 2253252 blocks)

153 MB....

The talloc report has a myriad duplicate printer related metadata objects. The talloc report is 2M lines, still grinding through it.

Comment 1 Alexander Bokovoy 2021-06-09 09:29:12 UTC
FYI, this was fixed by a backport in Fedora 34: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1946950

Comment 4 Alexander Bokovoy 2021-06-14 16:33:46 UTC
*** Bug 1971714 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 8 errata-xmlrpc 2021-11-09 19:48:02 UTC
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory (samba bug fix and enhancement update), and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2021:4438


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.