Bug 197048 - Review Request: pam_script
Summary: Review Request: pam_script
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: Package Review
Version: rawhide
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Jason Tibbitts
QA Contact: Fedora Package Reviews List
Depends On:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
Reported: 2006-06-28 09:46 UTC by Michael J Knox
Modified: 2007-11-30 22:11 UTC (History)
0 users

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Last Closed: 2006-06-28 22:07:17 UTC
Type: ---

Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Michael J Knox 2006-06-28 09:46:30 UTC
Spec URL: http://www.knox.net.nz/~michael/pam_script.spec
SRPM URL: http://www.knox.net.nz/~michael/pam_script-0.1.7-1.src.rpm

Description: pam_script is a module which allows to execute scripts after opening
and/or closing a session using PAM.

Comment 1 Jason Tibbitts 2006-06-28 15:06:17 UTC
This fails to build in mock:

+ make
gcc -Wall -pedantic -fPIC -shared  -o pam_script.so pam_script.c
pam_script.c:23:34: error: security/_pam_macros.h: No such file or directory
pam_script.c:24:34: error: security/pam_modules.h: No such file or directory
pam_script.c:48: error: expected ')' before '*' token
pam_script.c:83: error: expected ')' before '*' token
pam_script.c:240: error: expected '=', ',', ';', 'asm' or '__attribute__' before
pam_script.c:249: error: expected '=', ',', ';', 'asm' or '__attribute__' before
pam_script.c:259: error: expected '=', ',', ';', 'asm' or '__attribute__' before
pam_script.c:296: error: expected '=', ',', ';', 'asm' or '__attribute__' before
make: *** [pam_script.so] Errror 1

Adding BuildRequires: pam-devel fixes this up; rpmlint is happy with the
resulting package.  I'll assume the BR: is there for the purposes of this review.

The compiler isn't called with the appropriate flags.  You need to pass in
${optflags} somehow.  This also causes the -debuginfo package to be broken.

* package meets naming and packaging guidelines (pam modules use an underscore).
* specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently.
* dist tag is present.
* build root is correct.
* license field matches the actual license.
* license is open source-compatible.  License text not included upstream. 
* source files match upstream:
   9f1031154718b79d6ee79c9c5231b1d4  pam-script-0.1.7.tar.gz
* latest version is being packaged.
X BuildRequires are proper.
* package builds in mock (development, x86_64) (after adding BR: pam-devel)
* rpmlint is silent.
* final provides and requires are sane:
   pam_script = 0.1.7-1.fc6
* shared libraries are present, internal to pam.
* package is not relocatable.
* owns the directories it creates (doesn't own /lib/security, but I think pam is
a requirement for any running system)
* doesn't own any directories it shouldn't.
* no duplicates in %files.
* file permissions are appropriate.
* %clean is present.
* %check is not present; no test suite upstream.
* no scriptlets present.
* code, not content.
* documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary.
* %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package.
* no headers.
* no pkgconfig files.
* no libtool .la droppings.
* not a GUI app.

Comment 2 Michael J Knox 2006-06-28 19:55:15 UTC
thanks for the review..

updated package ans spec

Spec URL: http://www.knox.net.nz/~michael/pam_script.spec
SRPM URL: http://www.knox.net.nz/~michael/pam_script-0.1.7-1.src.rpm

Comment 3 Michael J Knox 2006-06-28 19:55:59 UTC
Sorry.. incorrect URLs, trying again. 

Spec URL: http://www.knox.net.nz/~michael/pam_script.spec
SRPM URL: http://www.knox.net.nz/~michael/pam_script-0.1.7-2.src.rpm

Comment 4 Jason Tibbitts 2006-06-28 21:00:26 UTC
Looks good; the package builds fine, the compiler is called with the proper
flags and the debuginfo package includes the files it's supposed to.


Comment 5 Michael J Knox 2006-06-28 22:07:17 UTC
Cheers for the review, imported into CVS and building on devel. 

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.