Description of problem: With the new TLS profile for the kubelet, the `oc explain` output doesn't match what is showing up in the kubelet.conf file. ``` $ oc explain kubeletconfig.spec.tlsSecurityProfile KIND: KubeletConfig VERSION: machineconfiguration.openshift.io/v1 RESOURCE: tlsSecurityProfile <Object> <snip> intermediate <> intermediate is a TLS security profile based on: https://wiki.mozilla.org/Security/Server_Side_TLS#Intermediate_compatibility_.28recommended.29 and looks like this (yaml): ciphers: - TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 - TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 - TLS_CHACHA20_POLY1305_SHA256 - ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 - ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 - ECDHE-ECDSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 - ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 - ECDHE-ECDSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 - ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 - DHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 - DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 minTLSVersion: TLSv1.2 <snip> old <> old is a TLS security profile based on: https://wiki.mozilla.org/Security/Server_Side_TLS#Old_backward_compatibility and looks like this (yaml): ciphers: - TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 - TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 - TLS_CHACHA20_POLY1305_SHA256 - ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 - ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 - ECDHE-ECDSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 - ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 - ECDHE-ECDSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 - ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 - DHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 - DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 - DHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 - ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-SHA256 - ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA256 - ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-SHA - ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA - ECDHE-ECDSA-AES256-SHA384 - ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 - ECDHE-ECDSA-AES256-SHA - ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA - DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA256 - DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA256 - AES128-GCM-SHA256 - AES256-GCM-SHA384 - AES128-SHA256 - AES256-SHA256 - AES128-SHA - AES256-SHA - DES-CBC3-SHA minTLSVersion: TLSv1.0 ``` kubeletConfig old profile, as reported in the kubelet.conf file: ``` <snip> "tlsCipherSuites": [ "TLS_ECDHE_ECDSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256", "TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256", "TLS_ECDHE_ECDSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384", "TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384", "TLS_ECDHE_ECDSA_WITH_CHACHA20_POLY1305_SHA256", "TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_CHACHA20_POLY1305_SHA256", "TLS_ECDHE_ECDSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256", "TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256", "TLS_ECDHE_ECDSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA", "TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA", "TLS_ECDHE_ECDSA_WITH_AES_256_CBC_SHA", "TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_CBC_SHA", "TLS_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256", "TLS_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384", "TLS_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256", "TLS_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA", "TLS_RSA_WITH_AES_256_CBC_SHA", "TLS_RSA_WITH_3DES_EDE_CBC_SHA" ], "tlsMinVersion": "VersionTLS10", ``` 18 listed, 29 listed in oc explain kubeletConfig intermediate profile, as reported in the kubelet.conf file for an affected node: ``` <snip> tlsMinVersion: VersionTLS12 tlsCipherSuites: - TLS_ECDHE_ECDSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 - TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 - TLS_ECDHE_ECDSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 - TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 - TLS_ECDHE_ECDSA_WITH_CHACHA20_POLY1305_SHA256 - TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_CHACHA20_POLY1305_SHA256 ``` 6 listed, 11 listed in How reproducible: Always Steps to Reproduce: 1. View the oc explain kubeletconfig.spec.tlsSecurityProfile output 2. Configure the old or intermediate TLS profile using a kubeletConfig 3. cat /etc/kubernetes/kubelet.conf on an afected node, get the list of ciphers Actual results: The ciphers listed in the `oc explain` output and the ciphers listed in the kubelet.com file on the node should are different Expected results: The ciphers listed in the `oc explain` output and the ciphers listed in the kubelet.com file on the node should match Additional info:
Since the problem described in this bug report should be resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For information on the advisory (Moderate: OpenShift Container Platform 4.9.0 bug fix and security update), and where to find the updated files, follow the link below. If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report. https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2021:3759