Bug 1973686 - single-node upgrade: some controller might go unavailable
Summary: single-node upgrade: some controller might go unavailable
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED WONTFIX
Alias: None
Product: OpenShift Container Platform
Classification: Red Hat
Component: Test Framework
Version: 4.9
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
unspecified
medium
Target Milestone: ---
: 4.8.z
Assignee: Devan Goodwin
QA Contact:
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On: 1940940
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2021-06-18 13:31 UTC by Fabio Bertinatto
Modified: 2022-02-02 18:43 UTC (History)
8 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Clone Of: 1940940
Environment:
Last Closed: 2022-02-02 18:43:20 UTC
Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Comment 1 Petr Muller 2021-10-19 09:53:48 UTC
Moving to Test Framework (component for OCP tests/ CI jobs) as discussed via Slack

Comment 2 Devan Goodwin 2021-11-09 14:26:44 UTC
Fabio could you carry this fix forward to the target release this was cloned for?

Comment 3 Fabio Bertinatto 2021-11-10 14:22:30 UTC
@Devan, which fix do you mean?

This ticket is about allowing single-node upgrade e2e jobs to tolerate operators going unavailable.

Comment 4 Devan Goodwin 2021-11-17 14:36:02 UTC
Fabio sorry we thought this was a clone to have a fix backported.

Do you have anyone planning to look at this change?

Comment 5 Fabio Bertinatto 2021-11-18 14:21:49 UTC
@Devan, no problem, thanks for the reply.

We aren't not planning to look into this change. We created this ticket and assigned it to Test Infrastructure team hoping someone more familiar with CI would adjust the single-node upgrade jobs to tolerate operators going Available=false. Apparently it was agreed on Slack that this ticket belongs to Test Framework team.

Just to give you more context, in the description of this ticket there's an explanation of why I think Available=false operators is OK in SNO upgrade jobs. Specifically, IMO the following test is not useful in those jobs:

> should not change condition/Available 

I'm assigning the ticket back to you, but feel free to reassign it or close it if you folks don't agree with this change.


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.