Bug 1974965 - Review Request: jello - Query JSON at the command line with Python syntax
Summary: Review Request: jello - Query JSON at the command line with Python syntax
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED DUPLICATE of bug 2059247
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: Package Review
Version: rawhide
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
unspecified
medium
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Nobody's working on this, feel free to take it
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2021-06-22 20:36 UTC by Kelly Brazil
Modified: 2022-02-28 15:53 UTC (History)
3 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2022-02-28 15:53:19 UTC
Type: ---
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Kelly Brazil 2021-06-22 20:36:41 UTC
Spec URL: https://jello-packages.s3.us-west-1.amazonaws.com/fedora/jello.spec
SRPM URL: <srpm info here>
Description: Query JSON at the command line with Python syntax
Fedora Account System Username: kellyjonbrazil

Hi team,

I am the developer of Jello (also JC) and I would like to request Jello to be packaged for Fedora. I created a src rpm spec similar to what we used for JC, so it should be pretty straightforward. I would prefer not to be the maintainer of the package.

https://github.com/kellyjonbrazil/jello

Thanks!
Kelly

Comment 1 Robert-André Mauchin 🐧 2021-07-03 13:27:47 UTC
> I would prefer not to be the maintainer of the package.

If you post a Review request here, it is to become the maintainer of the package. If you want someone to be maintainer of the package, you have to find someone willing to do it. I suggest sending a mail to the devel mailing list asking for help:

https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org/

Try also asking the maintainer of JC if they are interested in maintaining your package.

Comment 2 Ben Beasley 2022-02-28 15:53:19 UTC

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 2059247 ***


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.