Bug 19753 - Wrong path in config + Problems with db3
Wrong path in config + Problems with db3
Status: CLOSED WORKSFORME
Product: Red Hat Linux
Classification: Retired
Component: rpm2html (Show other bugs)
7.0
i386 Linux
medium Severity medium
: ---
: ---
Assigned To: Jeff Johnson
:
Depends On:
Blocks:
  Show dependency treegraph
 
Reported: 2000-10-25 10:00 EDT by Matthias Saou
Modified: 2008-05-01 11:37 EDT (History)
1 user (show)

See Also:
Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2001-01-06 16:51:34 EST
Type: ---
Regression: ---
Mount Type: ---
Documentation: ---
CRM:
Verified Versions:
Category: ---
oVirt Team: ---
RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: ---


Attachments (Terms of Use)

  None (edit)
Description Matthias Saou 2000-10-25 10:00:08 EDT
Just like in webalizer, the path where the created pages should go in the
default config file
is still /home/httpd/html instead of /var/www/html. This shouldn't be too
long to fix ;)
One other problem is the non-critical "rpm2html: Symbol `rpmTagTable' has
different
size in shared object, consider re-linking" message when rpm2html starts...
And the last one is that the [localbase] part in the default config file
doesn't work. Here
is the error message I get :

[dude@marmotte dude]$ rpm2html /etc/rpm2html.config 
rpm2html: Symbol `rpmTagTable' has different size in shared object,
consider re-linking
Created directory "/var/www/html/rpms/local"
Scanning the database of installed RPMs
cannot open Packages index using db3 - No such file or directory (2)

--> The rpm database cannot be opened in db3 format.
    If you have just upgraded the rpm package you need to convert
    your database to db3 format by running "rpm --rebuilddb" as root.

Could it be that the rpm database has changed places? format? The default
config file
searches for the rpm database in /usr/lib/rpm

Matthias
Comment 1 Jeff Johnson 2001-01-06 16:51:31 EST
You need to get versions of rpm2html and rpm that are in sync with each other.
I'd
suggest installing the Red Hat 7.0 packages.
Comment 2 Daniel Veillard 2001-07-17 19:34:00 EDT
All this seems fixed in recent releases, let's close this bug.

Daniel

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.