Hi Vasi, Review and share your inputs for this BZ to be differed out of 5.0? Regards, Veer
Doesn't seem to me like a RADOS issue?
https://tracker.ceph.com/issues/52117
Moving to Cephadm as these 2 values are set by Cephadm and need proper IPv6 URL formatting there.
Seems this needs a backport of https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/42990
This is already in 5.1 and already has an errata.
Moving to POST as those commits are in 5.1 already.
Thomas, can you move this to ON_QA?
*** Bug 2061269 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Since the problem described in this bug report should be resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For information on the advisory (Moderate: Red Hat Ceph Storage 5.1 Security, Enhancement, and Bug Fix update), and where to find the updated files, follow the link below. If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report. https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2022:1174