Bug 19759 - Install stalls when installing from RH 7.0 NFS server
Summary: Install stalls when installing from RH 7.0 NFS server
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat Linux
Classification: Retired
Component: nfs-server   
(Show other bugs)
Version: 7.0
Hardware: i386
OS: Linux
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Michael K. Johnson
QA Contact:
Depends On:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
Reported: 2000-10-25 15:57 UTC by Bill Stephens
Modified: 2008-05-01 15:37 UTC (History)
0 users

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of:
Last Closed: 2002-12-15 02:55:17 UTC
Type: ---
Regression: ---
Mount Type: ---
Documentation: ---
Verified Versions:
Category: ---
oVirt Team: ---
RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: ---

Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Bill Stephens 2000-10-25 15:57:13 UTC
I have 2 Dell 2400's identically configured.  One running RH 6.2 and one 
running RH 7.0.  Both are sitting side by side on the same network 
(physical and logical).  When I run an anaconda install from the RH 6.2 
machine, the install completes in about 10 minutes.  When I run the 
install from the RH 7.0 server, it frequently stalls with "server stopped 
responding still trying".  The process completed after about 2.5 hours.  
The target machine is the same machine in both cases (I'm installing to a 
test machine).  If I telnet to the RH 7.0 machine I don't have any 
response time issues with the telnet session, so I don't think it's 
network related. Both source machines are SMP machines 667 mhz for each 
processor.  The CPU is <5% utilized, and with 512 mb memory, there are 
scads of available memory on both boxes.  What else could be causing the 
long delays?  I'm suspecting the new NFS on a SMP machine.  Any help would 
be appreciated.


Bill Stephens

Comment 1 Bill Stephens 2000-10-27 15:41:33 UTC
The problem is definately related to SMP.  After dropping the RH 7.0 box into 
Uniprocessor mode by selecting the UP kernel option at startup.  The RH 7 box 
functions/loads at the same rate as the RH 6.2 SMP box.


Comment 2 Bill Stephens 2000-10-30 14:04:22 UTC
There was an nfs race condition reported as fixed in kernel 2.2.17.  I tested 
the 2.2.17 kernel out, and it does resolve the issue.  How do I package up my 
new working kernel etc. to replace the broken kernel shipping in RH7.0?  Or 
would you like to release an errata kernel?


Bill Stephens

Comment 3 Bill Stephens 2000-11-14 17:11:44 UTC
Hello, anyone home?

Comment 4 John Strange 2000-11-22 04:23:16 UTC
I have the same problem, I've created a NFS based kickstart installation, it
seems to work fine from my Workstation to the kickstart server.  But when I try
to kickstart the Dell Precision 620 workstations, I have tons of NFS errors and
it's VERY slow.

I do believe that it's partly related to the 3com card that I have or definetly
a NFS error.  I am running with a 3com 3c90x (rev 120) it's intergrated on the
motherboard so I don't have a known way to identify it.

[root@host /root] # cat /proc/pci | grep -i 3com
Ethernet controller: 3Com Unknown device (rev 120).

Any ideas??

I don't seem to hear much of a response on bug reports does anyone respond to

Comment 5 Bill Stephens 2000-11-22 13:11:54 UTC
Interesting spin, I hadn't thought of that.  I think you're on to something.  
I'm using the 3com 3c905C-TX card.  Using RedHat's kernel, it's loading as a 
3c90x card, and I get lots of timeouts.  When I compile my own stock kernel, it 
loads as a 3c59x, which is what was loading on my 6.2 system with the same 

This is only my second major incident I've opened.  My first incident went 
quite well, this one has not been a positive experience.  I'm wondering if the 
$7 share price has anything to do with it.  They definately seem to be ignoring 
bug reports with this release, maybe they're waiting on a recount to see if the 
number of bugs decreases.


Comment 6 John Strange 2000-11-22 15:19:14 UTC

I've had nothing but trouble with redhat kernels using the 3c90x kernels, if
that is your main problem download a standard 2.2.17 from ftp.us.kernel.org and
things will straighten up for you.

I have done this on the machines and everything works fine far as NFS and
ethernet issues.  Unfortunately I haven't had enough time to attempt to build my
own installation disk yet, as this would fix my problem.

I just wish they would fix their ethernet driver, and NFS issues.  Hoepfully
when 2.4 is released it will clean up most of the NFS issues that have plaqued

Comment 7 Bill Stephens 2001-02-22 18:39:16 UTC
Hello, hello, hello, hello.  This problem has been open since last October. Has 
anyone looked at it yet?  Is anyone still working here?

Comment 8 Michael K. Johnson 2001-02-22 19:15:25 UTC
The 3c59x driver was not able to handle some cards when we released
7.0 that it is now able to handle.  We did release a 2.2.17 errata
kernel recently.

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.