Bug 1975908 - Review Request: rust-getset - A procedural macro for generating the most basic getters and setters on fields
Summary: Review Request: rust-getset - A procedural macro for generating the most basi...
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED RAWHIDE
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: Package Review
Version: rawhide
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
unspecified
unspecified
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Robert-André Mauchin 🐧
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2021-06-24 17:19 UTC by Davide Cavalca
Modified: 2021-08-04 17:28 UTC (History)
2 users (show)

Fixed In Version: rust-getset-0.1.1-2.fc35
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2021-08-04 17:28:22 UTC
Type: ---
Embargoed:
eclipseo: fedora-review+

Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Davide Cavalca 2021-06-24 17:19:53 UTC 
Spec URL: https://dcavalca.fedorapeople.org/review/rust-getset/rust-getset.spec
SRPM URL: https://dcavalca.fedorapeople.org/review/rust-getset/rust-getset-0.1.1-1.fc35.src.rpm

Description:
We're ready to go!
A procedural macro for generating the most basic getters and setters on fields.

Fedora Account System Username: dcavalca
Comment 1 Davide Cavalca 2021-06-24 17:19:55 UTC 
This package built on koji:  https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=70748998
Comment 2 Robert-André Mauchin 🐧 2021-07-04 15:45:04 UTC 
 - Please remove the "We're ready to go!" from the summary/description and just use

"A procedural macro for generating the most basic getters and setters on fields"

 - License ok
 - Latest version packaged
 - Builds in mock
 - No rpmlint errors
 - Conforms to Packaging Guidelines

Package approved.
Comment 3 Davide Cavalca 2021-07-04 16:34:46 UTC 
Thanks!

$ fedpkg request-repo rust-getset 1975908
https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/35515
Comment 4 Gwyn Ciesla 2021-07-06 15:18:01 UTC 
(fedscm-admin):  The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/rust-getset
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.