Bug 1976915 - monitor crash when processing message from multifs authorized client
Summary: monitor crash when processing message from multifs authorized client
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat Ceph Storage
Classification: Red Hat Storage
Component: CephFS
Version: 5.0
Hardware: All
OS: All
high
high
Target Milestone: ---
: 5.0z1
Assignee: Patrick Donnelly
QA Contact: Yogesh Mane
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks: 1959686
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2021-06-28 14:25 UTC by Patrick Donnelly
Modified: 2021-11-02 16:38 UTC (History)
6 users (show)

Fixed In Version: ceph-16.2.0-133.el8cp
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
.Ceph monitors no longer crash when processing authentication requests from Ceph File System clients Previously, if a client did not have permission to view a legacy file system, the Ceph monitors would crash when processing authentication requests from clients. This caused the Ceph monitors to become unavailable. With this release, the code update fixes the handling of legacy file system authentication requests and authentication requests work as expected.
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2021-11-02 16:38:27 UTC
Embargoed:

Attachments (Terms of Use)


Links
System ID Private Priority Status Summary Last Updated
Ceph Project Bug Tracker 51286 0 None None None 2021-06-28 14:25:05 UTC
Red Hat Issue Tracker RHCEPH-1793 0 None None None 2021-09-18 17:53:17 UTC
Red Hat Product Errata RHBA-2021:4105 0 None None None 2021-11-02 16:38:56 UTC

Description Patrick Donnelly 2021-06-28 14:25:05 UTC 
Description of problem:

See: https://tracker.ceph.com/issues/51077
Comment 17 errata-xmlrpc 2021-11-02 16:38:27 UTC 
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory (Red Hat Ceph Storage 5.0 Bug Fix update), and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2021:4105
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.