Bug 1978346 - The lapack packages man pages for MAX and MIN conflict with MAX and MIN from man-pages package
Summary: The lapack packages man pages for MAX and MIN conflict with MAX and MIN from ...
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED RAWHIDE
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: lapack
Version: rawhide
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
unspecified
unspecified
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Tom "spot" Callaway
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2021-07-01 15:46 UTC by stan
Modified: 2021-07-19 12:42 UTC (History)
5 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2021-07-09 18:39:08 UTC
Type: Bug
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description stan 2021-07-01 15:46:01 UTC
Description of problem:
There is a naming problem in lapack for man pages MIN and MAX because the conflict with existing man pages in the man-pages package.  Maybe they need to be renamed?  lapack-MIN and lapack-MAX?

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
3.9.1-1.fc35.x86_64

How reproducible:
every time

Steps to Reproduce:
1.  Have the man-pages package installed
2.  Try to install the lapack package
3.

Actual results:
Error: Transaction test error:
  file /usr/share/man/man3/MAX.3.gz from install of lapack-3.9.1-1.fc35.x86_64 conflicts with file from package man-pages-5.12-1.fc35.noarch
  file /usr/share/man/man3/MIN.3.gz from install of lapack-3.9.1-1.fc35.x86_64 conflicts with file from package man-pages-5.12-1.fc35.noarch

Expected results:
successful install

Additional info:

Comment 1 Michal Jaegermann 2021-07-08 22:45:50 UTC
Bug 1980579 was filed about the same issue but against man-pages. A lapack update to 3.10.0-1.fc35 continues to provide manpages in question and bumps into the same conflict.

Comment 2 Nikola Forró 2021-07-09 12:10:31 UTC
Since these two man pages from lapack are in fact links to lapacke_utils.h.3, simply renaming the files would be sufficient to avoid the conflict. Another possible solution would be to introduce a section called for example "3l" exclusively for lapack man pages. What do you think, Tom?

Comment 3 Tom "spot" Callaway 2021-07-09 18:39:08 UTC
Should be fixed in -2. Sorry for the delay.

Comment 4 stan 2021-07-19 12:42:28 UTC
Life happens. :-)  Thanks for your help.


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.