Bug 1982069
| Summary: | [CephFS-Mirror] - seeing sync failures when the path used for mirroring is removed and added back. | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Red Hat Storage] Red Hat Ceph Storage | Reporter: | Hemanth Kumar <hyelloji> |
| Component: | CephFS | Assignee: | Venky Shankar <vshankar> |
| Status: | CLOSED ERRATA | QA Contact: | Hemanth Kumar <hyelloji> |
| Severity: | high | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | high | ||
| Version: | 5.0 | CC: | ceph-eng-bugs, pdonnell, sweil, tserlin, vereddy, vshankar |
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||
| Target Release: | 5.0 | ||
| Hardware: | Unspecified | ||
| OS: | Unspecified | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | ceph-16.2.0-107.el8cp | Doc Type: | If docs needed, set a value |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2021-08-30 08:31:46 UTC | Type: | Bug |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
| Embargoed: | |||
|
Comment 3
Venky Shankar
2021-07-14 09:39:30 UTC
Hi Venky, Do you have an update on the fix, ETA? for Jul 29 GA this is on the critical path. QE will need this BZ ON_QA by Jul 22 to verify the fix and generate RC build by Jul 26. (In reply to Veera Raghava Reddy from comment #6) > Hi Venky, > Do you have an update on the fix, ETA? > for Jul 29 GA this is on the critical path. QE will need this BZ ON_QA by > Jul 22 to verify the fix and generate RC build by Jul 26. https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/42329 -- fix is under review/testing upstream. Since the problem described in this bug report should be resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For information on the advisory (Red Hat Ceph Storage 5.0 bug fix and enhancement), and where to find the updated files, follow the link below. If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report. https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2021:3294 |