RHEL Engineering is moving the tracking of its product development work on RHEL 6 through RHEL 9 to Red Hat Jira (issues.redhat.com). If you're a Red Hat customer, please continue to file support cases via the Red Hat customer portal. If you're not, please head to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira and file new tickets here. Individual Bugzilla bugs in the statuses "NEW", "ASSIGNED", and "POST" are being migrated throughout September 2023. Bugs of Red Hat partners with an assigned Engineering Partner Manager (EPM) are migrated in late September as per pre-agreed dates. Bugs against components "kernel", "kernel-rt", and "kpatch" are only migrated if still in "NEW" or "ASSIGNED". If you cannot log in to RH Jira, please consult article #7032570. That failing, please send an e-mail to the RH Jira admins at rh-issues@redhat.com to troubleshoot your issue as a user management inquiry. The email creates a ServiceNow ticket with Red Hat. Individual Bugzilla bugs that are migrated will be moved to status "CLOSED", resolution "MIGRATED", and set with "MigratedToJIRA" in "Keywords". The link to the successor Jira issue will be found under "Links", have a little "two-footprint" icon next to it, and direct you to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira (issue links are of type "https://issues.redhat.com/browse/RHEL-XXXX", where "X" is a digit). This same link will be available in a blue banner at the top of the page informing you that that bug has been migrated.

Apparently Gitlab cannot support a source RPM named “tree”, so the source package has to be renamed for the mass rebuild. Otherwise we won't be able to build it.

I don't actually think that's the case.  The tool that syncs it should be able to handle this, or we can do a manual workaround.

Brian, what's the status on this one?

The repository used for the last build is in a non-standard location: https://gitlab.com/redhat/centos-stream/temp/tree-cmd

I can issue a scratch build for that, but I don't know if the /temp/ path will result in policy violation for a real build (real builds should be restricted in what URLs they can use).

Note that there was a similar issue with Pagure but it least did not affect builds:

    https://pagure.io/pagure/issue/4409

I started a thread regarding this problem:

Proposal: Add pkg- prefix to package names in CentOS dist-git
https://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-devel/2021-August/077299.html

Thank you, Florian!

I have initiated the package rename request in Fedora:

    bug #2001467 - Review Request: tree-pkg - File system tree viewer

CentOS Stream merge request: https://gitlab.com/redhat/centos-stream/rpms/tree-pkg/-/merge_requests/1

*** Bug 2013647 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory (new packages: tree-pkg), and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2022:3942