Bug 1982387 - Review Request: ghc-OpenGL - A binding for the OpenGL graphics system
Summary: Review Request: ghc-OpenGL - A binding for the OpenGL graphics system
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: Package Review
Version: rawhide
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
unspecified
unspecified
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Tristan Cacqueray
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2021-07-14 18:24 UTC by Jens Petersen
Modified: 2021-11-23 02:13 UTC (History)
2 users (show)

Fixed In Version: ghc-OpenGL-3.0.3.0-1.fc36
Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2021-11-14 03:43:37 UTC
Type: ---
Embargoed:
tdecacqu: fedora-review+


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Jens Petersen 2021-07-14 18:24:38 UTC
Spec URL: https://petersen.fedorapeople.org/reviews/ghc-OpenGL/ghc-OpenGL.spec
SRPM URL: https://petersen.fedorapeople.org/reviews/ghc-OpenGL/ghc-OpenGL-3.0.3.0-1.fc35.src.rpm

Description:
A Haskell binding for the OpenGL graphics system (GL, version 4.6) and its
accompanying utility library (GLU, version 1.3).

OpenGL is the industry's most widely used and supported 2D and 3D graphics
application programming interface (API), incorporating a broad set of
rendering, texture mapping, special effects, and other powerful visualization
functions. For more information about OpenGL and its various extensions, please
see <http://www.opengl.org/> and <http://www.opengl.org/registry/>.


Koji scratch build: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=71892786

Comment 1 Tristan Cacqueray 2021-10-29 15:40:47 UTC
Package Review
==============

Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated


Issues:
=======


===== MUST items =====

C/C++:
[x]: Package does not contain kernel modules.
[x]: Package contains no static executables.
[x]: Development (unversioned) .so files in -devel subpackage, if present.
     Note: Unversioned so-files in private %_libdir subdirectory (see
     attachment). Verify they are not in ld path.
[x]: Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la)
[x]: Rpath absent or only used for internal libs.

Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
     other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
     Guidelines.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
[x]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed.
[x]: %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise.
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[x]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory
     names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
     Provides are present.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: Useful -debuginfo package or justification otherwise.
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[x]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
     (~1MB) or number of files.
     Note: Documentation size is 10240 bytes in 2 files.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least
     one supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
     Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
     license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
     license(s) for the package is included in %license.
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
     beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Dist tag is present.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package must not depend on deprecated() packages.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't
     work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as
     provided in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
     %{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local

===== SHOULD items =====

Generic:
[-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate
     file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments).
[x]: Package functions as described.
[x]: Latest version is packaged.
[x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream.
[-]: Sources are verified with gpgverify first in %prep if upstream
     publishes signatures.
     Note: gpgverify is not used.
[-]: Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains
     translations for supported Non-English languages, if available.
[?]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported
     architectures.
[-]: %check is present and all tests pass.
[x]: Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed
     files.
[x]: Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock.
[x]: Buildroot is not present
[x]: Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or
     $RPM_BUILD_ROOT)
[x]: No file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, /usr/sbin.
[x]: Fully versioned dependency in subpackages if applicable.
[x]: Packager, Vendor, PreReq, Copyright tags should not be in spec file
[x]: Sources can be downloaded from URI in Source: tag
[x]: SourceX is a working URL.
[x]: Spec use %global instead of %define unless justified.

===== EXTRA items =====

Generic:
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all installed packages.
     Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: Large data in /usr/share should live in a noarch subpackage if package
     is arched.
[x]: Spec file according to URL is the same as in SRPM.


Rpmlint
-------
Checking: ghc-OpenGL-3.0.3.0-1.fc36.x86_64.rpm
          ghc-OpenGL-devel-3.0.3.0-1.fc36.x86_64.rpm
          ghc-OpenGL-3.0.3.0-1.fc36.src.rpm
ghc-OpenGL.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US www -> WWW, wow
ghc-OpenGL.x86_64: W: no-documentation
ghc-OpenGL.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US www -> WWW, wow
3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 3 warnings.




Rpmlint (installed packages)
----------------------------
Cannot parse rpmlint output:


Unversioned so-files
--------------------
ghc-OpenGL: /usr/lib64/libHSOpenGL-3.0.3.0-IbZzTeOU8DILsHSSITp6Y3-ghc8.10.5.so

Source checksums
----------------
https://hackage.haskell.org/package/OpenGL-3.0.3.0/OpenGL.cabal#/OpenGL-3.0.3.0.cabal :
  CHECKSUM(SHA256) this package     : 811cf7cf2f325bde04efb021ef9b6a86a3b7383583f4bc6471b7a66c56ae889c
  CHECKSUM(SHA256) upstream package : 811cf7cf2f325bde04efb021ef9b6a86a3b7383583f4bc6471b7a66c56ae889c
https://hackage.haskell.org/package/OpenGL-3.0.3.0/OpenGL-3.0.3.0.tar.gz :
  CHECKSUM(SHA256) this package     : 5a05ffc752dfc7dd16818d7b3c7c59a27639e246cdfa1963fa02e3ce247a2e19
  CHECKSUM(SHA256) upstream package : 5a05ffc752dfc7dd16818d7b3c7c59a27639e246cdfa1963fa02e3ce247a2e19


Requires
--------
ghc-OpenGL (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered):
    libGL.so.1()(64bit)
    libGLU.so.1()(64bit)
    libHSGLURaw-2.0.0.4-9SqZlfW4mA58vluyKqFclc-ghc8.10.5.so()(64bit)
    libHSObjectName-1.1.0.1-EKgNKa79iW1AJutQFqiTVZ-ghc8.10.5.so()(64bit)
    libHSOpenGLRaw-3.3.4.0-Eqi3GbgWEeA8OR0caxWrHR-ghc8.10.5.so()(64bit)
    libHSStateVar-1.2.2-It1hbplVavsB39KpwsXcML-ghc8.10.5.so()(64bit)
    libHSarray-0.5.4.0-ghc8.10.5.so()(64bit)
    libHSbase-4.14.2.0-ghc8.10.5.so()(64bit)
    libHSbinary-0.8.8.0-ghc8.10.5.so()(64bit)
    libHSbytestring-0.10.12.0-ghc8.10.5.so()(64bit)
    libHScontainers-0.6.4.1-ghc8.10.5.so()(64bit)
    libHSdeepseq-1.4.4.0-ghc8.10.5.so()(64bit)
    libHSfixed-0.3-3JVH1sv7oMg52YIcxBwKR7-ghc8.10.5.so()(64bit)
    libHSghc-boot-th-8.10.5-ghc8.10.5.so()(64bit)
    libHSghc-prim-0.6.1-ghc8.10.5.so()(64bit)
    libHShalf-0.3.1-BRlwexI8A3uBHxv3tEBs7D-ghc8.10.5.so()(64bit)
    libHSinteger-gmp-1.0.3.0-ghc8.10.5.so()(64bit)
    libHSpretty-1.1.3.6-ghc8.10.5.so()(64bit)
    libHSstm-2.5.0.1-ghc8.10.5.so()(64bit)
    libHStemplate-haskell-2.16.0.0-ghc8.10.5.so()(64bit)
    libHStext-1.2.4.1-ghc8.10.5.so()(64bit)
    libHStransformers-0.5.6.2-ghc8.10.5.so()(64bit)
    libc.so.6()(64bit)
    libgmp.so.10()(64bit)
    libm.so.6()(64bit)
    rtld(GNU_HASH)

ghc-OpenGL-devel (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered):
    ghc-OpenGL(x86-64)
    ghc-compiler
    ghc-devel(GLURaw-2.0.0.4-9SqZlfW4mA58vluyKqFclc)
    ghc-devel(ObjectName-1.1.0.1-EKgNKa79iW1AJutQFqiTVZ)
    ghc-devel(OpenGLRaw-3.3.4.0-Eqi3GbgWEeA8OR0caxWrHR)
    ghc-devel(StateVar-1.2.2-It1hbplVavsB39KpwsXcML)
    ghc-devel(base-4.14.2.0)
    ghc-devel(bytestring-0.10.12.0)
    ghc-devel(containers-0.6.4.1)
    ghc-devel(text-1.2.4.1)
    ghc-devel(transformers-0.5.6.2)



Provides
--------
ghc-OpenGL:
    ghc-OpenGL
    ghc-OpenGL(x86-64)
    libHSOpenGL-3.0.3.0-IbZzTeOU8DILsHSSITp6Y3-ghc8.10.5.so()(64bit)

ghc-OpenGL-devel:
    ghc-OpenGL-devel
    ghc-OpenGL-devel(x86-64)
    ghc-OpenGL-static
    ghc-OpenGL-static(x86-64)
    ghc-devel(OpenGL-3.0.3.0-IbZzTeOU8DILsHSSITp6Y3)



Generated by fedora-review 0.7.6 (b083f91) last change: 2020-11-10
Command line :/bin/fedora-review -b 1982387
Buildroot used: fedora-rawhide-x86_64
Active plugins: Shell-api, Haskell, Generic, C/C++
Disabled plugins: Python, fonts, PHP, SugarActivity, Java, R, Perl, Ocaml
Disabled flags: EPEL6, EPEL7, DISTTAG, BATCH, EXARCH

Comment 2 Jens Petersen 2021-10-29 19:25:37 UTC
Thanks for the review, Tristan!

I opened https://pagure.io/releng/issue/10363

Comment 4 Fedora Update System 2021-11-05 06:51:58 UTC
FEDORA-2021-57f277ce17 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 35. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-57f277ce17

Comment 5 Jens Petersen 2021-11-05 11:28:32 UTC
One more https://pagure.io/releng/issue/10372 for unblocking f33/f34.

Comment 6 Fedora Update System 2021-11-06 01:12:06 UTC
FEDORA-2021-57f277ce17 has been pushed to the Fedora 35 testing repository.
Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf install --enablerepo=updates-testing --advisory=FEDORA-2021-57f277ce17 \*`
You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-57f277ce17

See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates.

Comment 7 Fedora Update System 2021-11-06 14:50:05 UTC
FEDORA-2021-fd62d62047 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 34. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-fd62d62047

Comment 8 Fedora Update System 2021-11-07 02:16:09 UTC
FEDORA-2021-fd62d62047 has been pushed to the Fedora 34 testing repository.
Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf install --enablerepo=updates-testing --advisory=FEDORA-2021-fd62d62047 \*`
You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-fd62d62047

See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates.

Comment 9 Fedora Update System 2021-11-14 03:43:37 UTC
FEDORA-2021-fd62d62047 has been pushed to the Fedora 34 stable repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.

Comment 10 Fedora Update System 2021-11-14 04:06:23 UTC
FEDORA-2021-57f277ce17 has been pushed to the Fedora 35 stable repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.

Comment 11 Fedora Update System 2021-11-14 13:26:43 UTC
FEDORA-2021-a78a82ac7d has been submitted as an update to Fedora 33. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-a78a82ac7d

Comment 12 Fedora Update System 2021-11-15 23:49:44 UTC
FEDORA-2021-a78a82ac7d has been pushed to the Fedora 33 testing repository.
Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf install --enablerepo=updates-testing --advisory=FEDORA-2021-a78a82ac7d \*`
You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-a78a82ac7d

See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates.

Comment 13 Fedora Update System 2021-11-23 02:13:09 UTC
FEDORA-2021-a78a82ac7d has been pushed to the Fedora 33 stable repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.