Note: This bug is displayed in read-only format because the product is no longer active in Red Hat Bugzilla.
This project is now read‑only. Starting Monday, February 2, please use https://ibm-ceph.atlassian.net/ for all bug tracking management.

Bug 1983838

Summary: rgw: `radosgw-admin bi list` does not handle non-ascii names correctly
Product: [Red Hat Storage] Red Hat Ceph Storage Reporter: J. Eric Ivancich <ivancich>
Component: RGWAssignee: J. Eric Ivancich <ivancich>
Status: CLOSED ERRATA QA Contact: Vidushi Mishra <vimishra>
Severity: high Docs Contact:
Priority: unspecified    
Version: 5.0CC: cbodley, ceph-eng-bugs, ceph-qe-bugs, gsitlani, kbader, kdreyer, mbenjamin, sweil, tserlin, vimishra
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: 5.0   
Hardware: Unspecified   
OS: Unspecified   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: ceph-16.2.0-104.el8cp Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2021-08-30 08:31:46 UTC Type: Bug
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description J. Eric Ivancich 2021-07-20 01:12:09 UTC 
Description of problem:

See: https://tracker.ceph.com/issues/50415


Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):


How reproducible:


Steps to Reproduce:
1.
2.
3.

Actual results:


Expected results:


Additional info:
Comment 1 RHEL Program Management 2021-07-20 01:12:17 UTC 
Please specify the severity of this bug. Severity is defined here:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/page.cgi?id=fields.html#bug_severity.
Comment 14 errata-xmlrpc 2021-08-30 08:31:46 UTC 
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory (Red Hat Ceph Storage 5.0 bug fix and enhancement), and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2021:3294