Bug 1984086 - [4.8] Installation with multipath parameters in parmfile fails (DNS resolution missing)
Summary: [4.8] Installation with multipath parameters in parmfile fails (DNS resolutio...
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Alias: None
Product: OpenShift Container Platform
Classification: Red Hat
Component: RHCOS
Version: 4.8
Hardware: s390x
OS: Linux
medium
medium
Target Milestone: ---
: 4.8.z
Assignee: Jonathan Lebon
QA Contact: Douglas Slavens
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On: 1974411 2006965
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2021-07-20 15:45 UTC by Jonathan Lebon
Modified: 2022-06-30 16:35 UTC (History)
20 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Clone Of: 1974411
Environment:
Last Closed: 2022-06-30 16:35:30 UTC
Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)


Links
System ID Private Priority Status Summary Last Updated
Red Hat Issue Tracker MULTIARCH-1415 0 Medium Backlog [4.8] Installation with multipath parameters in parmfile fails (DNS resolution missing) 2021-07-20 15:50:09 UTC

Description Jonathan Lebon 2021-07-20 15:45:31 UTC
+++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #1974411 +++

Description of problem:

An installation with multipath parameters in the parmfile:

rd.multipath=default
coreos.inst.install_dev=/dev/mapper/mpatha

and hostnames in the parmfile fails.

The installation ends with an emergency shell. Network (IP) is configured, but name resolution is not working. Ping with IP to other system works.

The same installation (with MP parameters) works, if IP addresses are specified instead of hostnames in the parmfile.

It also works with hostnames in the parmfile, if rd.multipath=default is removed and sda is used instead of dev/mapper/mpatha.

It looks like the MP parameter(s) breaks the correct setup of the name resolution during installation. Not sure if it should be there, but there is no /etc/resolv.conf in the booted linux (emergency shell).


Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

oc version
Client Version: 4.8.0-0.nightly-s390x-2021-06-18-055818
Server Version: 4.8.0-0.nightly-s390x-2021-06-18-055818
Kubernetes Version: v1.21.0-rc.0+120883f


How reproducible:

Install a node with MP parameters and hostnames in the parmfile.


Steps to Reproduce:
1.
2.
3.

Actual results:

Installation ends in an emergency shell.

Expected results:

Installation process works.

Additional info:

--- Additional comment from Prashanth Sundararaman on 2021-06-21 19:09:41 EDT ---



--- Additional comment from Prashanth Sundararaman on 2021-06-21 19:14:08 EDT ---

Hi Jonathan,

Is this a possible regression caused by https://github.com/coreos/fedora-coreos-config/pull/1011 ?

Like the original description says, if the ignition url is configured with a hostname, the coreos-installer errors out. If configured with an ip address, it works.

Thanks
Prashanth

--- Additional comment from Dan Li on 2021-06-22 10:25:50 EDT ---

Setting "Blocker-" after discussing with the team. Based on these reasons:
1. configuring multipath as a day 2 operation still works
2. specifying ip address instead of hostname works

--- Additional comment from Jonathan Lebon on 2021-06-22 11:02:14 EDT ---

Hmm, I'm not sure how this could be multipath related.
It looks a lot like https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1967483, except in the initrd.

Full logs from the initrd would be helpful, esp. NetworkManager.

--- Additional comment from Prashanth Sundararaman on 2021-06-22 15:57:13 EDT ---

funnily enough the coreos-livepxe-rootfs.service succeeds so it is able to resolve the hostname there, but not when running the coreos-installer.

--- Additional comment from Jonathan Lebon on 2021-06-22 16:05:19 EDT ---

(In reply to Jonathan Lebon from comment #4)
> Hmm, I'm not sure how this could be multipath related.
> It looks a lot like https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1967483,
> except in the initrd.

Sorry, this is incorrect. This BZ matches rhbz#1967483 in that respect as well, since coreos-installer.service runs in the real root.
(I'm so used to "emergency shell" referring to the initrd emergency shell that my brain jumped to that. :) )

--- Additional comment from Nikita Dubrovskii (IBM) on 2021-06-23 08:50:43 EDT ---

Today did some testing of custom rhcos-4.8 (with https://github.com/coreos/coreos-installer/pull/564), ignition config gets downloaded from github.com - system works without any DNS issues.
(
Here is cmdline:
```
Kernel command line: rd.neednet=1 dfltcc=off random.trust_cpu=on rd.znet=qeth,0.0.bdf0,0.0.bdf1,0.0.bdf2,layer2=1,por
tno=0 console=ttysclp0 ip=172.18.142.3::172.18.0.1:255.254.0.0:coreos:encbdf0:off nameserver=172.18.0.1 coreos.inst=yes coreos.inst.
insecure=yes coreos.inst.ignition_url=https://raw.githubusercontent.com/nikita-dubrovskii/s390x-ignition-configs/master/ignition.ign
 coreos.live.rootfs_url=http://172.18.10.243/rhcos-48.84.202106231130-0-live-rootfs.s390x.img zfcp.allow_lun_scan=0 cio_ignore=all,!
condev rd.zfcp=0.0.1903,0x500507630910d435,0x408240d100000000 rd.zfcp=0.0.1943,0x500507630914d435,0x408240d100000000 coreos.inst.ins
tall_dev=sda coreos.inst.mpath=yes 
```
)

Using another zVM/Linux as http-server with ignition config - also works (http://m1314001.lnxne.boe:8080/ignition/ignition.ign).
But using http://bastion.ocp-m1314001.lnxne.boe:8080/ignition/ignition.ign - doesn't work, 
so i guess there is smth wrong with bastion node's config (as you can see same m1314001 is used as http-server).

--- Additional comment from Jonathan Lebon on 2021-06-24 15:06:15 EDT ---

> Using another zVM/Linux as http-server with ignition config - also works (http://m1314001.lnxne.boe:8080/ignition/ignition.ign).
But using http://bastion.ocp-m1314001.lnxne.boe:8080/ignition/ignition.ign - doesn't work, 
so i guess there is smth wrong with bastion node's config (as you can see same m1314001 is used as http-server).

That's interesting, thanks for the tests. I did some interactive debugging via screenshare with @madeel on this and indeed we saw the install pass without multipath enabled, and fail with it enabled.

I'm still not sure how multipath can affect DNS resolution, unless it simply makes an existing race easier to trigger. If that's the case, then it might be helped by https://github.com/coreos/coreos-installer/pull/565. I've made a scratch build with that patch:

http://brew-task-repos.usersys.redhat.com/repos/scratch/jlebon/coreos-installer/0.9.0/7.pr565.rhaos4.8.el8/s390x/

Re-hosted RPMs in a public space if you don't have VPN access:

https://jlebon.fedorapeople.org/coreos-installer-0.9.0-7.pr565.rhaos4.8.el8.s390x.rpm
https://jlebon.fedorapeople.org/coreos-installer-bootinfra-0.9.0-7.pr565.rhaos4.8.el8.s390x.rpm

Developers with access to an s390x machine who can reproduce this bug should be able to build an RHCOS image with those RPMs and test that.

--- Additional comment from Nikita Dubrovskii (IBM) on 2021-06-25 04:00:07 EDT ---

Ok, look's like i've got what' wrong here:

1) with 'coreos.inst.install_dev=/dev/mapper/mpatha rd.multipath=default' and `hostname.com/ignition.conf` and in the parm file:
coreos-installer cannot fetch ignition (DNS), but! at first coreos tries to propagate 'multipat.conf' to the '/sysroot', so we end up with a failure:

```
coreos-propagate-multipath-conf[926]: cp: cannot create regular file '/sysroot/etc/multipath.conf': Read-only file system 
systemd[1]: coreos-propagate-multipath-conf.service: Main process exited, code=exited, status=1/FAILURE 
...

systemd[1]: Reached target Emergency Mode. 
```

2) with `coreos.inst.install_dev=/dev/mapper/mpatha rd.multipath=default` and `1.2.3.4/ignition.conf`  in the parm file:
coreos-installer can fetch ignition (no DNS) , but fails with `kpartx` (propagation of 'multipat.conf' to the '/sysroot' also failed):

```
coreos-propagate-multipath-conf[926]: cp: cannot create regular file '/sysroot/etc/multipath.conf': Read-only file system 
...
systemd[1]: Reached target Emergency Mode. 
...

[   23.522376] coreos-installer-service[1859]: device-mapper: resume ioctl on mpatha4  failed: Invalid argument 
[   23.522453] coreos-installer-service[1859]: resume failed on mpatha4 
[   23.811211] coreos-installer-service[1859]: Error: getting partition table for /dev/mapper/mpatha 
[   23.811374] coreos-installer-service[1859]: Caused by: 
[   23.811395] coreos-installer-service[1859]:     "kpartx" "-u" "-n" "/dev/dm-0" failed with exit code: 1 
Failed to start CoreOS Installer. 
```

If we take a look at /etc/resolv.conf without multipath, we have valid config:
```
search lnxne.boe  
nameserver 172.18.0.1
```

But with `rd.multipath=default` it's empty, systemd already had failed, so for me it looks not like a DNS issue.


And installing this way also makes no sense - during fristboot coreos starts without multipath, 
so i don't see any reason for installing coreos with `rd.multipath=default` right now.


i would assume this as not a bug, or not a DNS-bug

--- Additional comment from Jonathan Lebon on 2021-06-28 12:10:41 EDT ---

(In reply to Nikita Dubrovskii (IBM) from comment #9)
> Ok, look's like i've got what' wrong here:
> 
> 1) with 'coreos.inst.install_dev=/dev/mapper/mpatha rd.multipath=default'
> and `hostname.com/ignition.conf` and in the parm file:

What is that karg? Do you mean `ip=...`? Can you show the full parmfile you used?

> coreos-installer cannot fetch ignition (DNS), but! at first coreos tries to
> propagate 'multipat.conf' to the '/sysroot', so we end up with a failure:
> 
> ```
> coreos-propagate-multipath-conf[926]: cp: cannot create regular file
> '/sysroot/etc/multipath.conf': Read-only file system 
> systemd[1]: coreos-propagate-multipath-conf.service: Main process exited,
> code=exited, status=1/FAILURE 
> ...
> 
> systemd[1]: Reached target Emergency Mode. 
> ```

Ouch good catch. So we continue on to the real root even if the service failed.

> 2) with `coreos.inst.install_dev=/dev/mapper/mpatha rd.multipath=default`
> and `1.2.3.4/ignition.conf`  in the parm file:
> coreos-installer can fetch ignition (no DNS) , but fails with `kpartx`
> (propagation of 'multipat.conf' to the '/sysroot' also failed):
> 
> ```
> coreos-propagate-multipath-conf[926]: cp: cannot create regular file
> '/sysroot/etc/multipath.conf': Read-only file system 
> ...
> systemd[1]: Reached target Emergency Mode. 
> ...
> 
> [   23.522376] coreos-installer-service[1859]: device-mapper: resume ioctl
> on mpatha4  failed: Invalid argument 
> [   23.522453] coreos-installer-service[1859]: resume failed on mpatha4 
> [   23.811211] coreos-installer-service[1859]: Error: getting partition
> table for /dev/mapper/mpatha 
> [   23.811374] coreos-installer-service[1859]: Caused by: 
> [   23.811395] coreos-installer-service[1859]:     "kpartx" "-u" "-n"
> "/dev/dm-0" failed with exit code: 1 
> Failed to start CoreOS Installer. 
> ```
> 
> If we take a look at /etc/resolv.conf without multipath, we have valid
> config:
> ```
> search lnxne.boe  
> nameserver 172.18.0.1
> ```
> 
> But with `rd.multipath=default` it's empty, systemd already had failed, so
> for me it looks not like a DNS issue.

OK, so I think there are two issues here:
1. `coreos-propagate-multipath-conf.service` doesn't have

```
OnFailure=emergency.target
OnFailureJobMode=isolate
```

2. We have no ordering between `coreos-propagate-multipath-conf.service` and `sysroot-etc.mount`.

<times passes>

Filed: https://github.com/coreos/fedora-coreos-config/pull/1077

Can you try that out?

> And installing this way also makes no sense - during fristboot coreos starts
> without multipath, 
> so i don't see any reason for installing coreos with `rd.multipath=default`
> right now.

It's valid to turn on multipath at installation time so that coreos-installer can copy the content on top of the multipath target (for the same reasons as https://github.com/coreos/fedora-coreos-config/pull/1011). coreos-installer should support this already (see e.g. https://github.com/coreos/coreos-installer/pull/499), but if we hit issues with kpartx there, let's work on fixing them.

--- Additional comment from Dan Li on 2021-06-28 14:49:30 EDT ---

Hi Muhammad, do you think this bug will be resolved before the end of this sprint (July 3rd)? If not, can we set "Reviewed-in-Sprint"?

--- Additional comment from  on 2021-06-29 03:45:13 EDT ---

Hi Dan, The root cause is still not clear, so please set the reviewed flag.

--- Additional comment from Nikita Dubrovskii (IBM) on 2021-06-29 04:45:21 EDT ---

(In reply to Jonathan Lebon from comment #10)
> (In reply to Nikita Dubrovskii (IBM) from comment #9)
> > Ok, look's like i've got what' wrong here:
> > 
> > 1) with 'coreos.inst.install_dev=/dev/mapper/mpatha rd.multipath=default'
> > and `hostname.com/ignition.conf` and in the parm file:
> 
> What is that karg? Do you mean `ip=...`? Can you show the full parmfile you
> used?

no, it's not an IP here, but some hostname:
``` ip=172.18.142.3::172.18.0.1:255.254.0.0:coreos:encbdf0:off nameserver=172.18.0.1 coreos.inst=yes coreos.inst.ignition_url=http://m1314001.lnxne.boe:8080/ignition/ignition.ign ```

```

> OK, so I think there are two issues here:
> 1. `coreos-propagate-multipath-conf.service` doesn't have
> 
> ```
> OnFailure=emergency.target
> OnFailureJobMode=isolate
> ```
> 2. We have no ordering between `coreos-propagate-multipath-conf.service` and
> `sysroot-etc.mount`.
> 
> <times passes>
> 
> Filed: https://github.com/coreos/fedora-coreos-config/pull/1077
> 
> Can you try that out?

Did it, works as expected:
- system could be installed using DNS (```coreos.inst.ignition_url=http://m1314001.lnxne.boe:8080/ignition/ignition.ign```)
- system could be installed using IP (```coreos.inst.ignition_url=http://172.18.10.243/ignition.ign```)

> with kpartx there, let's work on fixing them.

Here is PR for kpartx issue:
https://github.com/coreos/coreos-installer/pull/566

--- Additional comment from Dan Li on 2021-07-19 10:38:56 EDT ---

Hi Muhammad, do you think this bug will move past ON_QA by the end of this Sprint? If not, can we add "reviewed-in-sprint" flag?

--- Additional comment from  on 2021-07-19 11:02:34 EDT ---

Hi Jonathan, do you know when the fix[https://github.com/coreos/fedora-coreos-config/pull/1077] will be pickup by RHCOS?

--- Additional comment from Jonathan Lebon on 2021-07-19 11:46:06 EDT ---

Will try to get it in the next 4.8 bootimage bump.

Comment 1 Dan Li 2021-07-21 14:11:34 UTC
Setting reviewed-in-sprint as we are waiting for OpenShift to pick up the RHCOS PR

Comment 2 Dan Li 2021-08-11 14:23:00 UTC
Hi Jonathan, will take bug fix take additional time to land? If so, I'd like to set the "reviewed-in-sprint" flag to "+" to indicate that we have examined this bug during the sprint.

Comment 3 Dan Li 2021-08-12 16:51:46 UTC
Adding "reviewed-in-sprint" as this bug is a clone of 1974411 and the other bug is currently at POST.

Comment 4 Dan Li 2021-08-30 16:48:36 UTC
Hi Jonathan, I noticed that BZ 1974411 is current ON_QA, does that affect the status of this bug? If not, I would like to set the "reviewed-in-sprint" flag if this bug will not be resolved before the end of the current sprint (September 4th)

Comment 5 Benjamin Gilbert 2021-08-31 05:42:25 UTC
This bug will move to MODIFIED as soon as https://github.com/openshift/installer/pull/5171 lands, which may happen this week.

Comment 6 Dan Li 2021-09-20 18:22:51 UTC
Hi Jonathan, do you think this bug will continued to be open in the upcoming sprint? If so, I'd like to add the "reviewed-in-sprint" flag. Also, should this bug be re-assigned to the RHCOS component since Jonathan is from the RHCOS team?

Comment 7 Jonathan Lebon 2021-09-20 19:40:03 UTC
This is still just waiting a bootimage bump.

(In reply to Dan Li from comment #6)
> Also, should
> this bug be re-assigned to the RHCOS component since Jonathan is from the
> RHCOS team?

I'm OK with this if you'd like. The original issue was specifically hit on s390x, and while the fixes aren't architecture specific, it'd be good to have the bug be verified on s390x once this goes to ON_QA.

Comment 8 Dan Li 2021-09-22 14:11:11 UTC
Re-assigning to the RHCOS component, however, we are keeping Doug as the default QA contact, once this bug reaches ON_QA, we can assign to one of the s390x QA to validate.

Comment 9 RHCOS Bug Bot 2021-09-28 14:05:25 UTC
The fix for this bug has landed in a bootimage bump, as tracked in bug 1982001 (now in status MODIFIED).  Moving this bug to MODIFIED.

Comment 13 Benjamin Gilbert 2021-10-15 18:51:30 UTC
It turns out that the fix did not properly land in the bootimage bump tracked by bug 1982001, so this bug has been moved to the bootimage bump tracked by bug 2006965.  To prevent a recurrence of this problem, the CoreOS team has changed its process so bootimage-dependent bugs are verified _before_ the bootimage bump is PRed.

As a result, this bug is in need of verification.  Please check that the problem is fixed in a current RHCOS 4.8 build on s390x, and then set the Bugzilla `Verified` field to `Tested`.

Comment 14 Douglas Slavens 2021-10-18 16:05:18 UTC
Setting status to ON_QA for verification.

Comment 15 RHCOS Bug Bot 2021-10-18 16:07:52 UTC
The fix for this bug will not be delivered to customers until it lands in an updated bootimage.  That process is tracked in bug 2006965, which has status ASSIGNED.  Moving this bug back to POST.

Comment 16 Benjamin Gilbert 2021-10-18 16:11:55 UTC
Note that the bootimage bump process now requires pre-landing verification of dependent bugs while they're still in POST.

Comment 18 Douglas Slavens 2021-10-19 15:23:02 UTC
Yes this will be the version that get tested. I provided the link to Muhammad who will conduct the testing.

Comment 19 Muhammad Adeel (IBM) 2021-10-20 06:44:30 UTC
I still didn't find which RHCOS/OpenShift version has the fix for this BZ on the provided link: https://releases-rhcos-art.cloud.privileged.psi.redhat.com/?stream=releases/rhcos-4.8-s390x
It is also not clear whether the fix for this BZ has already landed in an RHCOS images.

Comment 21 Muhammad Adeel (IBM) 2021-10-26 11:05:17 UTC
@miabbott I can't read private comments if you are writing any...

Comment 22 Benjamin Gilbert 2021-10-26 18:32:44 UTC
@madeel The gist of comment 20 is that any recent RHCOS 4.8 build should have the fix, so please try to verify with a current build from the ART build browser.

Comment 23 Muhammad Adeel (IBM) 2021-10-27 09:52:07 UTC
Verified: DNS missing resolution is not reproducible using 4.8.17 / 48.84.202110152102-0

However the node is not able to boot with multipath enabled in kernel arguments(this was not seen on 4.9):

rd.multipath=default coreos.inst.install_dev=/dev/mapper/mpatha

The coreos.inst.install_dev karg value did not carry to coreos-installer:

coreos-installer-service: coreos-installer install /dev/sda --ignition-url http://bastion.ocp-m1314001.lnxne.boe:8080/ignition/master.ign --insecure-ignition --append-karg zfcp.allow_lun_scan=0 --append-karg cio_ignore=all,!condev --append-karg rd.znet=qeth,0.0.1003,0.0.1004,0.0.1005,layer2=1 --append-karg rd.zfcp=0.0.8002,0x500507630a0350a4,0x400140ED00000000 --append-karg rd.zfcp=0.0.8002,0x500507630a1b50a4,0x400140ED00000000 --append-karg rd.zfcp=0.0.8102,0x500507630a0b50a4,0x400140ED00000000 --append-karg rd.zfcp=0.0.8102,0x500507630a1350a4,0x400140ED00000000 --firstboot-args rd.neednet=1 ip=10.13.114.3::10.13.114.1:255.255.255.0::enc1003:none nameserver=10.13.114.1
coreos-installer-service: Installing Red Hat Enterprise Linux CoreOS 48.84.202110152102-0 (Ootpa) s390x (512-byte sectors)
  sda: sda3 sda4
  16.005498¨  sda: sda3 sda4
  17.002226¨ coreos-installer-service: Read disk 123.7 MiB/3.4 GiB (3%)
...output omitted...
  47.957533¨ coreos-installer-service: Read disk 3.4 GiB/3.4 GiB (100%)
  49.318579¨ GPT:Primary header thinks Alt. header is not at the end of the disk.
  49.318586¨ GPT:7219199 != 251658239
  49.318588¨ GPT:Alternate GPT header not at the end of the disk.
  49.318589¨ GPT:7219199 != 251658239
  49.318590¨ GPT: Use GNU Parted to correct GPT errors.
  49.318599¨  sda: sda3 sda4
  49.544607¨ coreos-installer-service: Error: found multiple devices on /dev/sda with label "boot"
  49.544768¨ coreos-installer-service: Resetting partition table
  49.565539¨  sda:
  49.790196¨ coreos-installer-service: Error: install failed
FAILED Ý0m¨ Failed to start CoreOS Installer.

Comment 24 Muhammad Adeel (IBM) 2021-10-27 11:29:09 UTC
Sorry my mistake the above statement regarding "coreos.inst.install_dev karg value did not carry to coreos-installer" is wrong. However, following error can be seen with 4.8:

coreos-installer-service: coreos-installer install /dev/mapper/mpatha --ignition-url http://bastion.ocp-m1314001.lnxne.boe:8080/ignition/master.ign --insecure-ignition --append-karg zfcp.allow_lun_scan=0 --append-karg cio_ignore=all,!condev --append-karg rd.znet=qeth,0.0.1003,0.0.1004,0.0.1005,layer2=1 --append-karg rd.zfcp=0.0.8002,0x500507630a0350a4,0x400140ED00000000 --append-karg rd.zfcp=0.0.8002,0x500507630a1b50a4,0x400140ED00000000 --append-karg rd.zfcp=0.0.8102,0x500507630a0b50a4,0x400140ED00000000 --append-karg rd.zfcp=0.0.8102,0x500507630a1350a4,0x400140ED00000000 --firstboot-args rd.neednet=1 ip=10.13.114.3::10.13.114.1:255.255.255.0::enc1003:none nameserver=10.13.114.1

coreos-installer-service: Installing Red Hat Enterprise Linux CoreOS 48.84.202110152102-0 (Ootpa) s390x (512-byte sectors)
 sd 0:0:0:1089290241: alua: port group 00 state A preferred supports tolusnA
   18.583546¨ sd 0:0:0:1089290241: alua: port group 00 state A preferred supports tolusnA
   18.626007¨ coreos-installer-service: device-mapper: resume ioctl on mpatha3  failed: Invalid argument
   18.626131¨ coreos-installer-service: resume failed on mpatha3
   18.964908¨ coreos-installer-service: Error: getting partition table for /dev/mapper/mpatha
   18.965080¨ coreos-installer-service: Caused by:
   18.965125¨ coreos-installer-service:     "kpartx" "-u" "-n" "/dev/dm-0" failed with exit code: 1
FAILED Ý0m¨ Failed to start CoreOS Installer.
See 'systemctl status coreos-installer.service' for details.
DEPEND Ý0m¨ Dependency failed for CoreOS Installer Target.

Comment 25 Benjamin Gilbert 2021-10-28 21:45:53 UTC
Marking pre-verified per comment 23.  The issue in comment 24 appears to be a separate problem.

Comment 27 RHCOS Bug Bot 2022-06-17 15:26:01 UTC
The fix for this bug has landed in a bootimage bump, as tracked in bug 2006965 (now in status MODIFIED).  Moving this bug to MODIFIED.

Comment 29 HuijingHei 2022-06-21 12:09:27 UTC
@madeel would you help to check if the bug is fixed with the latest build in https://releases-rhcos-art.cloud.privileged.psi.redhat.com/?stream=releases/rhcos-4.8-s390x (and issue in Comment #24 can be reproduced)? Thanks!

Comment 31 Amadeus 2022-06-27 08:26:55 UTC
@hhei I verified the defect and with release 4.8.45 the installation finished successful (Issue reported in comment 24 doesn't showed up anymore).

Comment 32 HuijingHei 2022-06-27 08:46:50 UTC
Thanks @Amadeus for your verification, change status to verified based on comment #31

Comment 34 errata-xmlrpc 2022-06-30 16:35:30 UTC
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory (OpenShift Container Platform 4.8.45 bug fix update), and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2022:5167


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.