Hide Forgot
Description of problem: sos clean does not add users from Active Directory to the private map for obfuscation. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): 4.1 Expected results: Any user who has accessed the system should be obfuscated. Additional info: This is resolved by https://github.com/sosreport/sos/pull/2619 My customer has tested this and AD users as well as local users were obfuscated. My customer would like this included in RHEL 8.5.
This is far too late to add to RHEL8.5. But it will be included in 8.6 for sure. Would you be able to test a candidate build within few months / once there will be a 8.6 candidate RPM?
This is a very important feature for my customer. They have a lot of security requirements around what data is sent outside the company network. If there is any way this could be included prior to 8.6 that would be great. I understand this might not be ready for 8.5 GA, but is there any way it could get included prior to 8.6? My customer would be willing to test any builds available. Thanks, Stephen
(In reply to Stephen Hobbs from comment #2) > This is a very important feature for my customer. They have a lot of > security requirements around what data is sent outside the company network. > If there is any way this could be included prior to 8.6 that would be great. > I understand this might not be ready for 8.5 GA, but is there any way it > could get included prior to 8.6? > > My customer would be willing to test any builds available. > > Thanks, > Stephen We will add it to 8.5.0 / backport the #2619 PR to 8.5.0 . We will welcome if you can test the candidate build (available within a week) on a real environment - we will mock it only.
I can have the build tested. Please let me know when it is ready. Thank you, Stephen Hobbs
Since the problem described in this bug report should be resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For information on the advisory (sos bug fix and enhancement update), and where to find the updated files, follow the link below. If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report. https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHEA-2021:4388