Bug 1988236 - Update mdadm to latest upstream
Summary: Update mdadm to latest upstream
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: mdadm
Version: 35
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
unspecified
unspecified
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: XiaoNi
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks: 2066149 2066150
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2021-07-30 05:49 UTC by XiaoNi
Modified: 2022-03-29 02:52 UTC (History)
5 users (show)

Fixed In Version: mdadm-4.2-1.fc35
Clone Of:
: 2066149 2066150 (view as bug list)
Environment:
Last Closed: 2022-03-29 02:52:47 UTC
Type: Bug
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Comment 1 Ben Cotton 2021-08-10 13:33:07 UTC
This bug appears to have been reported against 'rawhide' during the Fedora 35 development cycle.
Changing version to 35.

Comment 2 XiaoNi 2021-08-11 05:14:55 UTC
Hi Ben

Thanks for the help. Can this mdadm update be released with f35? I did fedpkg update before.
But now, it looks like the fedpkg update is done automatically. 

Thanks
Xiao

Comment 3 Adam Williamson 2021-08-12 15:56:21 UTC
Your recent build is tagged for both f35 and f36 (Rawhide) already. You do not need to create updates manually for F35 yet, only after the "Bodhi updates-testing activation point" on 2021-08-24 (see https://fedorapeople.org/groups/schedule/f-35/f-35-devel-tasks.html ).

However, the build was versioned wrong. You cannot just use "rc2" as the 'release' component. Versioning guidelines are here:

https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/Versioning/

with examples here:

https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Package_Versioning_Examples

this package should have been versioned 4.2-0.1.rc2, the 'release' component should have been "0.1.rc2". If you then updated the package without going to a new upstream release, the next would be "0.2.rc2". If upstream released an rc3, then you'd go to "0.3.rc3".

Thanks!

Comment 4 XiaoNi 2021-08-13 00:32:14 UTC
Hi Adam

Thanks for pointing about this. Do I need to fix this problem this time and do a new build?
Or I can fix this in next build in the future?

Thanks
Xiao

Comment 5 Adam Williamson 2021-08-13 05:46:27 UTC
In this case it should be OK to just fix it with the next build.

Comment 6 Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski 2022-02-21 12:59:24 UTC
4.2 is out, can we get this updated in F35+?

Comment 7 XiaoNi 2022-02-23 05:08:09 UTC
4.2 will be updated in rawhide. For f35/f36, we only fix bugs. Is it ok?

Comment 8 XiaoNi 2022-02-23 05:09:28 UTC
Hi Adam

I see mdadm-4.2-rc2 is already in f35/f36/rawhide. In rhel produce, the errata can be change the bug to ON_QA.
Then qe team verify the bug and move it to Verified. At last, the bug is closed.

How about fedora? It's still New now. What should I do for this one now? close it? Do you know a doc or something else
that can help me to understand the process.

Thanks
Xiao

Comment 9 Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski 2022-02-23 13:04:56 UTC
XiaoNi, 4.2rc2 (release candidate) is not 4.2 final release. Changes between rc2 and final are bugfixes, so it's definitely OK to update in F35+.

Comment 10 XiaoNi 2022-02-28 00:39:19 UTC
It makes sense. I'll do it this week

Comment 11 Fedora Update System 2022-03-21 05:37:07 UTC
FEDORA-2022-dc110bf419 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 35. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2022-dc110bf419

Comment 12 Fedora Update System 2022-03-22 04:13:52 UTC
FEDORA-2022-dc110bf419 has been pushed to the Fedora 35 testing repository.
Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing --advisory=FEDORA-2022-dc110bf419`
You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2022-dc110bf419

See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates.

Comment 13 Fedora Update System 2022-03-29 02:52:47 UTC
FEDORA-2022-dc110bf419 has been pushed to the Fedora 35 stable repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.