Bug 1988404 - [cephadm][rgw][upgrade]: cephadm-adopt playbook creates default realm
Summary: [cephadm][rgw][upgrade]: cephadm-adopt playbook creates default realm
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat Ceph Storage
Classification: Red Hat Storage
Component: Ceph-Ansible
Version: 5.0
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
unspecified
medium
Target Milestone: ---
: 5.0
Assignee: Guillaume Abrioux
QA Contact: Vasishta
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks: 1959686
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2021-07-30 13:39 UTC by Madhavi Kasturi
Modified: 2021-08-30 08:31 UTC (History)
12 users (show)

Fixed In Version: ceph-ansible-6.0.11.1-1.el8cp
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
The `cephadm-adopt` playbook does not create default realms for multisite configuration Previously, it was required for the `cephadm-adopt` playbook to create the default realms during the adoption process, even when there was no multisite configuration present. With this release, the `cephadm-adopt` playbook does not enforce the creation of default realms when there is no multisite configuration deployed.
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2021-08-30 08:31:46 UTC
Embargoed:

Attachments (Terms of Use)


Links
System ID Private Priority Status Summary Last Updated
Red Hat Issue Tracker RHCEPH-645 0 None None None 2021-08-18 21:54:05 UTC
Red Hat Product Errata RHBA-2021:3294 0 None None None 2021-08-30 08:31:58 UTC

Comment 9 Sebastian Wagner 2021-08-09 09:47:21 UTC 
Dimitri, 

> @Sebastian: should we continue to force the realm/zonegroup/zone creation during the adoption process or we can drop it now ?


I've added this to the agenda of tomorrow's upstream orchestrator weekly. Home that#s ok for you.
Comment 14 errata-xmlrpc 2021-08-30 08:31:46 UTC 
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory (Red Hat Ceph Storage 5.0 bug fix and enhancement), and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2021:3294
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.