Bug 198867 - bugzilla.redhat.com performance very poor
Summary: bugzilla.redhat.com performance very poor
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED NEXTRELEASE
Alias: None
Product: Bugzilla
Classification: Community
Component: Bugzilla General
Version: 2.18
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
medium
medium
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: David Lawrence
QA Contact: David Lawrence
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2006-07-14 09:57 UTC by James Hunt
Modified: 2007-04-18 17:45 UTC (History)
0 users

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2006-08-01 14:47:50 UTC
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description James Hunt 2006-07-14 09:57:39 UTC
Description of problem:

bugzilla.redhat.com is consistently slow to load, and particularly slow to
create a bug. This has been the case for a long while now, although I've only
got frustrated enough to raise this bug today! :-)

I think the facility itself is very good, but the performance (whether it be the
back-end database, the hardware hosting it, the web server (ssl, etc), or a
combo) is really not a good advertisement for bugzilla, MySQL, or indeed RHEL.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

2.18-rh

How reproducible:

Every time.

Steps to Reproduce:
1.
2.
3.
  
Actual results:


Expected results:


Additional info:

Comment 1 David Timms 2006-07-16 02:59:53 UTC
James, are you referring to the time taken from clicking Submit the bug report
until you get the bug submitted page (with the redirect to the submitted report) ?

Comment 2 James Hunt 2006-07-21 10:23:59 UTC
Well, trying not to sound too critical, it's all pretty slow. Queries are slow,
even when you open a bug ("Enter Bug (expert)"), it takes a relatively long time
to load all the values for the fields (for example "product" and "version").

I don't have quantitative data, but it just isn't "snappy", like google, for
example. I realize google doesn't use RDBMS's for it's search, but I'd still
expect subsecond query response time. I realize SSL adds a major overhead though.

Comment 3 David Lawrence 2006-08-01 14:47:50 UTC
Moving to new server in the coming weeks. Please stay tuned.


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.