Note: This bug is displayed in read-only format because the product is no longer active in Red Hat Bugzilla.
RHEL Engineering is moving the tracking of its product development work on RHEL 6 through RHEL 9 to Red Hat Jira (issues.redhat.com). If you're a Red Hat customer, please continue to file support cases via the Red Hat customer portal. If you're not, please head to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira and file new tickets here. Individual Bugzilla bugs in the statuses "NEW", "ASSIGNED", and "POST" are being migrated throughout September 2023. Bugs of Red Hat partners with an assigned Engineering Partner Manager (EPM) are migrated in late September as per pre-agreed dates. Bugs against components "kernel", "kernel-rt", and "kpatch" are only migrated if still in "NEW" or "ASSIGNED". If you cannot log in to RH Jira, please consult article #7032570. That failing, please send an e-mail to the RH Jira admins at rh-issues@redhat.com to troubleshoot your issue as a user management inquiry. The email creates a ServiceNow ticket with Red Hat. Individual Bugzilla bugs that are migrated will be moved to status "CLOSED", resolution "MIGRATED", and set with "MigratedToJIRA" in "Keywords". The link to the successor Jira issue will be found under "Links", have a little "two-footprint" icon next to it, and direct you to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira (issue links are of type "https://issues.redhat.com/browse/RHEL-XXXX", where "X" is a digit). This same link will be available in a blue banner at the top of the page informing you that that bug has been migrated.

Bug 1989287

Summary: pmproxy not working if redis is still loading data during startup
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8 Reporter: Amey <abetkike>
Component: pcpAssignee: Andreas Gerstmayr <agerstmayr>
Status: CLOSED ERRATA QA Contact: Jan Kurik <jkurik>
Severity: unspecified Docs Contact: Jacob Taylor Valdez <jvaldez>
Priority: unspecified    
Version: 8.4CC: agerstmayr, jkurik, nathans, peter.vreman
Target Milestone: betaKeywords: Bugfix, Triaged
Target Release: 8.6Flags: pm-rhel: mirror+
Hardware: Unspecified   
OS: Unspecified   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: pcp-5.3.5-1.el8 Doc Type: No Doc Update
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2022-05-10 13:30:52 UTC Type: Bug
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Comment 1 Mark Goodwin 2021-08-03 00:27:10 UTC
This bug needs essentially the same fix as upstream issue #1357:
#1357 pmproxy redis connect/reconnect 
https://github.com/performancecopilot/pcp/issues/1357


If pmproxy redis config is enabled but the initial version check fails to connect, then pmproxy should periodically retry until successful. It's the same fix whether redis isn't enabled/started or if it's too busy starting-up/loading. Either way, pmproxy should retry rather than have to be restarted.

Comment 2 Peter Vreman 2021-08-04 15:47:18 UTC
Mark,

Confirming from my user perspective that the retry is the best solution that will solve more than this single version check failure.

Does the planned fix for adding retry also include the scenario that redis is restarted during the lifetime of pmproxy?

Peter

Comment 3 Nathan Scott 2021-08-04 22:22:53 UTC
(In reply to Peter Vreman from comment #2)
> Mark,
> 

(I'll answer for Mark today as he's on PTO)

> Confirming from my user perspective that the retry is the best solution that
> will solve more than this single version check failure.

Thanks.

> Does the planned fix for adding retry also include the scenario that redis
> is restarted during the lifetime of pmproxy?

Yes.

Comment 10 errata-xmlrpc 2022-05-10 13:30:52 UTC
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory (pcp bug fix and enhancement update), and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2022:1765