Hello, Please note that this comment was generated automatically. If you feel that this output has mistakes, please contact me via email (mhroncok). Your package (ghc-codec-rpm) Fails To Install in Fedora 35: can't install ghc-codec-rpm: - nothing provides libHSbase-4.13.0.0-ghc8.8.4.so()(64bit) needed by ghc-codec-rpm-0.2.2-11.fc35.x86_64 - nothing provides libHSghc-prim-0.5.3-ghc8.8.4.so()(64bit) needed by ghc-codec-rpm-0.2.2-11.fc35.x86_64 - nothing provides libHSbytestring-0.10.10.1-ghc8.8.4.so()(64bit) needed by ghc-codec-rpm-0.2.2-11.fc35.x86_64 - nothing provides libHSinteger-gmp-1.0.2.0-ghc8.8.4.so()(64bit) needed by ghc-codec-rpm-0.2.2-11.fc35.x86_64 - nothing provides libHStext-1.2.4.0-ghc8.8.4.so()(64bit) needed by ghc-codec-rpm-0.2.2-11.fc35.x86_64 - nothing provides libHSmtl-2.2.2-ghc8.8.4.so()(64bit) needed by ghc-codec-rpm-0.2.2-11.fc35.x86_64 - nothing provides libHSattoparsec-0.13.2.4-6pdJvsCYDtQ1ZikLcQPH6i-ghc8.8.4.so()(64bit) needed by ghc-codec-rpm-0.2.2-11.fc35.x86_64 - nothing provides libHSconduit-1.3.2-GEXEZMtviOuHNxrPcLgmIL-ghc8.8.4.so()(64bit) needed by ghc-codec-rpm-0.2.2-11.fc35.x86_64 - nothing provides libHSconduit-extra-1.3.5-L63PAS5C8gV6HUdaFkL6gF-ghc8.8.4.so()(64bit) needed by ghc-codec-rpm-0.2.2-11.fc35.x86_64 - nothing provides libHSparsec-3.1.14.0-ghc8.8.4.so()(64bit) needed by ghc-codec-rpm-0.2.2-11.fc35.x86_64 - nothing provides libHSattoparsec-binary-0.2-2CW9DGJuf57L1koC850lql-ghc8.8.4.so()(64bit) needed by ghc-codec-rpm-0.2.2-11.fc35.x86_64 - nothing provides libHSlzma-conduit-1.2.1-IPL4dm45PODPwd9TwQH0v-ghc8.8.4.so()(64bit) needed by ghc-codec-rpm-0.2.2-11.fc35.x86_64 - nothing provides libHSpretty-1.1.3.6-ghc8.8.4.so()(64bit) needed by ghc-codec-rpm-0.2.2-11.fc35.x86_64 - nothing provides libHSresourcet-1.2.4.2-BShiHv2u3v34Zgdp68CuDV-ghc8.8.4.so()(64bit) needed by ghc-codec-rpm-0.2.2-11.fc35.x86_64 can't install ghc-codec-rpm-devel: - nothing provides ghc-devel(base-4.13.0.0) needed by ghc-codec-rpm-devel-0.2.2-11.fc35.x86_64 - nothing provides ghc-devel(bytestring-0.10.10.1) needed by ghc-codec-rpm-devel-0.2.2-11.fc35.x86_64 - nothing provides ghc-devel(text-1.2.4.0) needed by ghc-codec-rpm-devel-0.2.2-11.fc35.x86_64 - nothing provides ghc-devel(conduit-1.3.2-GEXEZMtviOuHNxrPcLgmIL) needed by ghc-codec-rpm-devel-0.2.2-11.fc35.x86_64 - nothing provides ghc-devel(conduit-extra-1.3.5-L63PAS5C8gV6HUdaFkL6gF) needed by ghc-codec-rpm-devel-0.2.2-11.fc35.x86_64 - nothing provides ghc-devel(attoparsec-0.13.2.4-6pdJvsCYDtQ1ZikLcQPH6i) needed by ghc-codec-rpm-devel-0.2.2-11.fc35.x86_64 - nothing provides ghc-devel(attoparsec-binary-0.2-2CW9DGJuf57L1koC850lql) needed by ghc-codec-rpm-devel-0.2.2-11.fc35.x86_64 - nothing provides ghc-devel(lzma-conduit-1.2.1-IPL4dm45PODPwd9TwQH0v) needed by ghc-codec-rpm-devel-0.2.2-11.fc35.x86_64 - nothing provides ghc-devel(resourcet-1.2.4.2-BShiHv2u3v34Zgdp68CuDV) needed by ghc-codec-rpm-devel-0.2.2-11.fc35.x86_64 - nothing provides ghc-compiler = 8.8.4 needed by ghc-codec-rpm-devel-0.2.2-11.fc35.x86_64 can't install ghc-codec-rpm-prof: - nothing provides ghc-prof(base-4.13.0.0) needed by ghc-codec-rpm-prof-0.2.2-11.fc35.x86_64 - nothing provides ghc-prof(bytestring-0.10.10.1) needed by ghc-codec-rpm-prof-0.2.2-11.fc35.x86_64 - nothing provides ghc-prof(text-1.2.4.0) needed by ghc-codec-rpm-prof-0.2.2-11.fc35.x86_64 - nothing provides ghc-prof(conduit-1.3.2-GEXEZMtviOuHNxrPcLgmIL) needed by ghc-codec-rpm-prof-0.2.2-11.fc35.x86_64 - nothing provides ghc-prof(conduit-extra-1.3.5-L63PAS5C8gV6HUdaFkL6gF) needed by ghc-codec-rpm-prof-0.2.2-11.fc35.x86_64 - nothing provides ghc-prof(attoparsec-0.13.2.4-6pdJvsCYDtQ1ZikLcQPH6i) needed by ghc-codec-rpm-prof-0.2.2-11.fc35.x86_64 - nothing provides ghc-prof(attoparsec-binary-0.2-2CW9DGJuf57L1koC850lql) needed by ghc-codec-rpm-prof-0.2.2-11.fc35.x86_64 - nothing provides ghc-prof(lzma-conduit-1.2.1-IPL4dm45PODPwd9TwQH0v) needed by ghc-codec-rpm-prof-0.2.2-11.fc35.x86_64 - nothing provides ghc-prof(resourcet-1.2.4.2-BShiHv2u3v34Zgdp68CuDV) needed by ghc-codec-rpm-prof-0.2.2-11.fc35.x86_64 If you know about this problem and are planning on fixing it, please acknowledge so by setting the bug status to ASSIGNED. If you don't have time to maintain this package, consider orphaning it, so maintainers of dependent packages realize the problem. If you don't react accordingly to the policy for FTBFS/FTI bugs (https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Fails_to_build_from_source_Fails_to_install/), your package may be orphaned in 8+ weeks. P.S. The data was generated solely from koji buildroot, so it might be newer than the latest compose or the content on mirrors. P.P.S. If this bug has been reported in the middle of upgrading multiple dependent packages, please consider using side tags: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Updates_Policy/#updating-inter-dependent-packages Thanks!
This bug appears to have been reported against 'rawhide' during the Fedora 35 development cycle. Changing version to 35.
Hello, This is the first reminder (step 3 from https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Fails_to_build_from_source_Fails_to_install/#_package_removal_for_long_standing_ftbfs_and_fti_bugs). If you know about this problem and are planning on fixing it, please acknowledge so by setting the bug status to ASSIGNED. If you don't have time to maintain this package, consider orphaning it, so maintainers of dependent packages realize the problem.
Hello, Please note that this comment was generated automatically. If you feel that this output has mistakes, please contact me via email (mhroncok). All subpackages of a package against which this bug was filled are now installable or removed from Fedora 36. Thanks for taking care of it!
Hello, Please note that this comment was generated automatically. If you feel that this output has mistakes, please contact me via email (mhroncok). All subpackages of a package against which this bug was filled are now installable or removed from Fedora 35. Thanks for taking care of it!