Note: This bug is displayed in read-only format because the product is no longer active in Red Hat Bugzilla.
RHEL Engineering is moving the tracking of its product development work on RHEL 6 through RHEL 9 to Red Hat Jira (issues.redhat.com). If you're a Red Hat customer, please continue to file support cases via the Red Hat customer portal. If you're not, please head to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira and file new tickets here. Individual Bugzilla bugs in the statuses "NEW", "ASSIGNED", and "POST" are being migrated throughout September 2023. Bugs of Red Hat partners with an assigned Engineering Partner Manager (EPM) are migrated in late September as per pre-agreed dates. Bugs against components "kernel", "kernel-rt", and "kpatch" are only migrated if still in "NEW" or "ASSIGNED". If you cannot log in to RH Jira, please consult article #7032570. That failing, please send an e-mail to the RH Jira admins at rh-issues@redhat.com to troubleshoot your issue as a user management inquiry. The email creates a ServiceNow ticket with Red Hat. Individual Bugzilla bugs that are migrated will be moved to status "CLOSED", resolution "MIGRATED", and set with "MigratedToJIRA" in "Keywords". The link to the successor Jira issue will be found under "Links", have a little "two-footprint" icon next to it, and direct you to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira (issue links are of type "https://issues.redhat.com/browse/RHEL-XXXX", where "X" is a digit). This same link will be available in a blue banner at the top of the page informing you that that bug has been migrated.

Bug 1995578

Summary: Canceling extraction of password protected archive brings misleading dialogue
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9 Reporter: Vitezslav Humpa <vhumpa>
Component: gnome-autoarAssignee: Ondrej Holy <oholy>
Status: CLOSED ERRATA QA Contact: Petr Schindler <pschindl>
Severity: low Docs Contact:
Priority: unspecified    
Version: 9.0CC: jkoten, oholy, tpelka, tpopela
Target Milestone: betaKeywords: Triaged
Target Release: 9.0Flags: pm-rhel: mirror+
Hardware: x86_64   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: gnome-autoar-0.4.1-2.el9 Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2022-05-17 13:32:51 UTC Type: Bug
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On: 2029425    
Bug Blocks:    
Deadline: 2021-12-20   

Description Vitezslav Humpa 2021-08-19 12:55:46 UTC
Description of problem:
A small hiccup in a new encrypted archives functionality in nautilus.
When canceling extraction of encrypted zip (that contains just a single file, doesn't happen with multifile archives) in the password dialogue, nautilus pops "Not enough free space to extract XXXX.zip" warning dialogue, which certainly is not a case. Also "File operations successfully finished" notification appears, this may not be a bug though.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
nautilus-40.2-2.el9.x86_64

How reproducible:
Create a single file archive with nautilus, choose password protected zip.
Double click the archive, but instead of giving a password, just hit Cancel.

Additional info:
Surely not a biggie thinking upstream-wise, but not so nice for a main UI-baed functionality to work with password encrypted archive in a enterprise system. Reported upstream: https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/nautilus/-/issues/1953

Comment 1 Ondrej Holy 2021-09-15 13:56:41 UTC
The following fix for this issue has been already merged: https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-autoar/-/merge_requests/28.

Comment 10 Petr Schindler 2021-12-20 22:59:24 UTC
gnome-autoar-0.4.1-2 fixes the bug. No regression found.

Comment 12 errata-xmlrpc 2022-05-17 13:32:51 UTC
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory (new packages: gnome-autoar), and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2022:2533