Bug 1995951 - olm.skipRange substitution is noop
Summary: olm.skipRange substitution is noop
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Alias: None
Product: OpenShift Container Platform
Classification: Red Hat
Component: kube-scheduler
Version: 4.6.z
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
medium
high
Target Milestone: ---
: 4.6.z
Assignee: Jan Chaloupka
QA Contact: RamaKasturi
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On: 1953707
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2021-08-20 09:23 UTC by Joep van Delft
Modified: 2021-09-22 20:06 UTC (History)
5 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Clone Of: 1995949
Environment:
Last Closed: 2021-09-22 20:06:36 UTC
Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)


Links
System ID Private Priority Status Summary Last Updated
Github openshift cluster-kube-descheduler-operator pull 212 0 None None None 2021-08-20 10:33:48 UTC
Red Hat Product Errata RHBA-2021:3517 0 None None None 2021-09-22 20:06:39 UTC

Description Joep van Delft 2021-08-20 09:23:37 UTC
+++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #1995949 +++

+++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #1995947 +++

+++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #1995946 +++

Description of problem:
olm.skipRange substitution does not work on 4.6. 

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):


How reproducible:


Steps to Reproduce:
1.
2.
3.

Actual results:


Expected results:


Additional info:

--- Additional comment from Joep van Delft on 2021-08-20 09:18:47 UTC ---

This is an admin bug to have a valid bug for 4.6.

--- Additional comment from Joep van Delft on 2021-08-20 09:20:33 UTC ---

This is an admin bug to have a valid one for 4.6

--- Additional comment from Joep van Delft on 2021-08-20 09:22:42 UTC ---

This is an admin bug to have a valid bug in 4.6.

Comment 1 Jan Chaloupka 2021-08-20 10:34:40 UTC
The chance of fixing this in 4.6 is quite low. We fix only critical issues at this point.

Comment 2 Jan Chaloupka 2021-09-02 15:59:02 UTC
Unlikely this will get through. What is your motivation for fixing it in 4,6?

Comment 3 Joep van Delft 2021-09-06 09:18:37 UTC
I'd say this is of some importance. ART wants to get more strict about failing substitutions.

Note that openshift/cluster-nfd-operator#206 recently made it into 4.6.

Comment 9 errata-xmlrpc 2021-09-22 20:06:36 UTC
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory (OpenShift Container Platform 4.6.45 bug fix update), and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2021:3517


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.