Bug 1996012
| Summary: | Provide more clarity on AWS instance types Supportability | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | OpenShift Container Platform | Reporter: | Rutvik <rkshirsa> |
| Component: | Documentation | Assignee: | Kelly Brown <kelbrown> |
| Status: | CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE | QA Contact: | Xiaoli Tian <xtian> |
| Severity: | unspecified | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | unspecified | ||
| Version: | 4.7 | CC: | kelbrown, rkant, rkshirsa |
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||
| Target Release: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | Unspecified | ||
| OS: | Unspecified | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | If docs needed, set a value | |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2022-09-13 13:35:22 UTC | Type: | Bug |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
| Embargoed: | |||
|
Comment 5
Kelly Brown
2022-08-15 17:01:47 UTC
Hello, I think the following statement just compliment what we have been already suggesting so far. [NOTE] ==== It is suggested to use the machine types included in the following charts for your instances. ==== How about adding this statement along the with the ^ same? + For any reason, if you plan to use instance that is not listed in the supported instance chart, then ensure the same instance satisfies the performance criteria. Let me know. I just updated the PR based on your suggestions, what do you think? Thank you for the feedback! Looks good now. Thank you for pulling this up. Updated documentation now shows *Tested* instance types (instead of supported) and adds NOTE for instance type clarification with minimum resource requirements Link to updated docs: https://docs.openshift.com/container-platform/4.11/installing/installing_aws/installing-aws-customizations.html#installation-aws-tested-machine-types_installing-aws-customizations |