Bug 1996866 - Review Request: python3-configobj - Config file reading, writing, and validation
Summary: Review Request: python3-configobj - Config file reading, writing, and validation
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED NOTABUG
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: Package Review
Version: rawhide
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
medium
medium
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Nobody's working on this, feel free to take it
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2021-08-23 21:05 UTC by Sam P
Modified: 2022-10-19 08:43 UTC (History)
3 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2022-10-19 08:43:01 UTC
Type: ---
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Sam P 2021-08-23 21:05:56 UTC
Spec URL: https://copr-dist-git.fedorainfracloud.org/cgit/survient/python3-configobj/python3-configobj.git/plain/python3-configobj.spec?id=5e9b6d212c9accf86527d34df2d037a25e21b81b
SRPM URL: https://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org/results/survient/python3-configobj/srpm-builds/02579607/python3-configobj-5.0.6-26.el7.src.rpm
Description: ConfigObj is a simple but powerful configuration file reader and writer: an ini\
file round tripper. Its main feature is that it is very easy to use, with a\
straightforward programmers interface and a simple syntax for config files.
Fedora Account System Username: survient

This is a separate build of python-configobj specifically for python 3 on EPEL7. I am trying to build an EPEL7 release of holland that has been ported to python3 and has python-configobj as a dependency. Any guidance or advice would be appreciated.

Comment 1 Dan Callaghan 2021-09-05 06:51:48 UTC
The .spec doesn't parse successfully on Fedora:

error: line 24: %package     -n python3-configobj: package python3-configobj already exists

I guess because on Fedora, %{python3_pkgversion} is 3 not 36, and so the `%files -n python3-configobj` is a duplicate name. That prevents me building it locally, but I think it isn't an issue for Koji because Koji re-parses the spec inside the buildroot to avoid exactly these kinds of issues.

So due to the above issue, I haven't been able to run the full fedora-review. However, I note that the .spec is identical to the existing, approved python-configobj package in every way except for the package name. On that basis I think it's okay to approve this.

Comment 2 Package Review 2022-09-17 15:05:24 UTC
Package was never imported.
The ticket status is being reset, since creating the repository will require a fresh approval.
Let us know if you're still interested in this package.


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.